Since the release of a May 2025 report exposing widespread noncompliance with Colorado’s 2022 oil and gas chemical disclosure law, well-by-well oil and gas chemical disclosures have significantly increased, nearly doubling the total submitted since the law took effect under the state’s landmark transparency legislation.
Overview
Statewide Disclosure Failures Prompt Public Outcry
The Colorado oil and gas transparency law (HB22-1348), which was passed in 2022 and took effect in July 2023, was enacted to give the public clear access to information about chemicals used underground in oil and gas development—both during drilling and fracking—while also banning the use of toxic PFAS substances. The law was intended to replace a legacy of secrecy with a system of accountability and health protection for communities near extraction sites.
Yet nearly two years later, a May 2025 analysis by Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR), PSR – Colorado, Colorado Sierra Club, and FracTracker Alliance revealed widespread noncompliance. Of the 1,114 wells required to report under the law, only 39% had any publicly available chemical disclosures. The systemic failure to implement the law as intended has left many communities without the critical information they need to understand potential chemical exposures.
View the interactive map developed by FracTracker that identifies all 1,114 wells subject to the 2022 chemical disclosure law as of May 1, 2025.
Millions of Pounds of Undisclosed Fracking Chemicals, Millions of Dollars in Potential Fines
According to the report titled “Oil and Gas Chemicals Still Secret in Colorado,” as of May 2025, 675 of 1,114 wells required to report chemical use had no disclosures on file with the Colorado Energy & Carbon Management Commission (ECMC), representing an estimated 30 million pounds of undisclosed fracking chemicals used across hundreds of wells in Colorado. Based on a conservative penalty of $200 per violation per day, the analysis found that non-compliant companies could already owe more than $37 million in fines.
“This law was supposed to break through the culture of secrecy which has surrounded the use of potentially toxic chemicals in oil and gas production,” the report’s author, PSR consultant Dusty Horwitt, said. “But lack of compliance has left the secrecy in place and Coloradans’ health at risk.”
Despite the scale of noncompliance, the report spurred a measurable increase in fracking chemical disclosures. In the weeks following its release, the Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission (ECMC) received more than 600 new well disclosures, nearly doubling the total submitted in the prior 17 months between December 2023, when the law required public chemical disclosures to begin, and May 2025.
By July 2025, over 90% of wells had submitted at least some disclosures related to fracking chemicals, indicating a strong industry response to public scrutiny and advocacy. However, major gaps still remain in the disclosure data.
Explore: See real-time disclosure trends at the Open-FF ECMC Disclosure Dashboard. |
Critical Gaps in Colorado Oil and Gas Chemical Transparency
The most significant gap in Colorado’s chemical disclosure framework is the apparent lack of reporting on chemicals used during the drilling phase—before fracking even begins—despite disclosure of all chemicals used underground in oil and gas wells being a key requirement under the state’s 2022 transparency law. While fracking chemical disclosures have improved in response to public scrutiny and advocacy, reporting on drilling chemicals appears to be virtually nonexistent as of July 2025.
This omission may carry profound consequences for residents living near oil and gas sites. Drilling chemicals are among the first substances introduced into the environment during well development and may include toxic additives including lubricants that could migrate into air, soil, and water. The first stage of drilling typically passes through groundwater before any protective steel casing or cement is inserted into the well to prevent migration of drilling chemicals into the groundwater. Therefore, if chemicals are used during the first stage of drilling, they are likely to pollute underground aquifers. Without access to drilling chemical data, communities are left unaware of what substances they may have been exposed to, potentially for months or years at a time.
The absence of full chemical reporting also prevents public health officials from identifying exposure pathways, conducting adequate risk assessments, or issuing targeted health advisories. For families living near these sites, this omission creates a dangerous information vacuum that undermines not only emergency response, but also long-term medical care and environmental remediation efforts.
Read more: US oil firms pumping secret chemicals into ground and not fully reporting it | The Guardian |
As PSR Colorado board chair Elizabeth Gillepsie, MD, MPH pointed out to The Guardian, not knowing what kinds of chemicals are being used makes it tough for medical professionals like herself to treat patients who live near these wells, who face higher incidences of leukemia, birth abnormalities and other serious health outcomes linked to fracking-related exposures. Communities on the frontlines of oil and gas development, many of whom are already burdened by cumulative environmental and social stressors, deserve timely, accurate, and complete information about the chemicals used in their neighborhoods. Without it, transparency laws fail the very people they were intended to protect.
These data points are not just theoretical; they have serious implications for public health and safety. One recent incident in Weld County offers a sobering illustration of what’s at stake when disclosure fails.
Drilling operation in Colorado. (FracTracker Alliance, 2010)
Case Study: Weld County Elementary School Incident
In early April 2025, a Chevron-operated well on the Bishop well pad near Galeton, Weld County, experienced a blowout that sprayed oil, gas, water, and chemicals for nearly five days. Approximately 20,000 barrels of produced water—wastewater that comes back up to the surface after a well is drilled and fracked—and 5,000 barrels of oil and condensate were released into the environment.
The fluid and vapor plume traveled up to two miles, affecting multiple homes, creeks, and, most notably, causing the temporary closure of Galeton Elementary School for much of April, where students and staff were evacuated as a protective measure. According to Emily Fischer, a professor of atmospheric science at Colorado State University, air monitoring during the event detected benzene levels around 35 ppb up to a mile away, which is four to 10 times above typical health safety thresholds, and also revealed toxic volatile organic compounds including hexane, toluene, and xylene.
The incident triggered a large emergency response with over 300 personnel mobilized, and launched an ongoing remediation plan covering a seven‑square‑mile area, divided into 300 cleanup parcels, with earthworks and sampling operations expected to last years, potentially until 2030. Chevron has since faced an ECMC enforcement action, including a notice of alleged violation citing six rule breaches, and is responsible for the ongoing cleanup and monitoring efforts.
Next Steps for Colorado Fracking Chemical Disclosure
Without full compliance, Colorado’s transparency law falls short of protecting the communities it was designed to serve, leaving residents without the knowledge they need to make informed choices about their health and safety.
“It is time to get serious about implementation and put the protection of Coloradans and their environment over industry interests,” said Ramesh Bhatt, Ph.D., Chair, Colorado Sierra Club Conservation Committee.
Moving forward, FracTracker Alliance and its partners will continue using data, mapping, and public education to spotlight implementation gaps, especially around drilling chemicals, and advocate for stronger enforcement.
Take Action
- Governor Polis: Enforce Colorado’s Chemical Disclosure Law and Protect Communities!
- Join Halt the Harm Network and reach out to Ryan Clover to join the Colorado Secret Chemicals campaign space
Learn More
- The disclosure status dashboard, a free tool developed by Open-FF, continues to track progress in real time for journalists, researchers, and community members working to hold the oil and gas industry accountable.
- View the interactive map developed by FracTracker that identifies all 1,114 wells originally subject to the 2022 chemical disclosure law.
Join the Conversation
Stay Informed
FracTracker Newsletter
Support Our Work
FracTracker Alliance helps communicate the risks of oil and gas and petrochemical development to advance just energy alternatives that protect public health, natural resources, and the climate.
By contributing to FracTracker, you are helping to make tangible changes, such as decreasing the number of oil and gas wells in the US, protecting the public from toxic and radioactive chemicals, and stopping petrochemical expansion into vulnerable communities.
Your donations help fund the sourcing and analysis of new data so that we can keep you informed and continually update our resources.
Please donate to FracTracker today as a way to advocate for clean water, clean air, and healthy communities.
What You Should Read Next

Colorado Operators Increase Chemical Disclosures After Public Pressure, but Major Gaps Remain

Evaluation of Federal Requirements for Plugging Orphaned Oil and Gas Wells: A Missouri Case Study

Methane Matters, but Make Polluters Pay: FracTracker’s Response to Carl Pope

Shell Polymers Monaca: 17.9 Billion Pounds of Emissions and Repeated Violations in Pennsylvania

Plum Borough Rejects Fracking Waste Injection Well After Public Pushback

Power Plant Locations and Unemployment Rates

Pipeline Incidents Are a Daily Occurrence

Environmental Justice Analysis of Oil Extraction in Los Angeles Communities

How Increased Protective Buffer Zones Could Help Protect 3.6 million Pennsylvanians

Regulatory Gaps and Resistance: The Battle Over Fracking in Southern Illinois

Can California Energy Policy Move Past its Contradictions?

Data Gaps: A Critical Examination of Oil and Gas Well Incidents in Ohio

Indigenous Communities’ Fight Against CO2 Pipelines in the Great Plains

Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Industry Trends: Drilled Wells, Violations, Production, and Waste

A Closer Look at Risks of the Appalachian Hydrogen Hub

Falcon Pipeline Criminal Charges Explained

The Importance of Surveying Rural Landowners in North Dakota on Fracking

Exploring the Fallout of Precision Scheduled Rail: A Rail Worker’s Perspective on Precision Scheduled Rail

Not-So-Radical Transparency: An Ineffective and Unnecessary Partnership Between Pennsylvania Governor Shapiro and the Gas Company CNX

California Must Improve Management of Idle Wells

Holes in FracFocus

Mapping PFAS Chemicals Used in Fracking Operations in West Virginia

Chevron’s $2.3 Billion Asset Adjustment Raises Questions Amidst Regulatory Changes in California

Stop Toxic Threat: A Heavy Industrial Zoning Battle

East Palestine Warning: The Growing Threat From Hazardous Waste Storage

Index of Oil and Gas Operator Health in California Shows Risks to State Economy and Taxpayers

Calling for Change: Life on the Fracking Frontlines

On the Wrong Track: Risks to Residents of the Upper Ohio River Valley From Railroad Incidents

Digital Atlas: Exploring Nature and Industry in the Raccoon Creek Watershed

Why Do Houses Keep Exploding in One Pennsylvania Suburb?

FracTracker Alliance Releases Statement Opposing Governor Shapiro’s Agreement With CNX

Oil and Gas Activity Within California Public Health Protection Zones

Assessment of Oil and Gas Well Ownership Transfers in California

Evaluation of the Capacity for Water Recycling for Colorado Oil and Gas Extraction Operations

Evidence Shows Oil and Gas Companies Use PFAS in New Mexico Wells

CalGEM Permit Review Q1 2023: Well Rework Permits Increase by 76% in California

2022 Pipeline Incidents Update: Is Pipeline Safety Achievable?

Testimony On EPA’s Proposed Methane Pollution Standards for the Oil and Gas Industry

Assessment of Rework Permits on Oil Production from Operational Wells Within the 3,200-Foot Public Health Protection Zone

CalGEM Permit Review Q4 2022: Oil Permit Approvals Show Steep Rise Within Protective Buffer Zones

A Contentious Landscape of Pipeline Build-outs in the Eastern US

Major Gas Leak Reveals Risks of Aging Gas Storage Wells in Pennsylvania

Coursing Through Gasland: A Digital Atlas Exploring Natural Gas Development in the Towanda Creek Watershed

Falcon Pipeline Online, Begins Operations Following Violations of Clean Streams Law

Synopsis: Risks to the Greater Columbus Water Supply from Oil and Gas Production

Desalination: The Chemical Industry’s Demand for Water in Texas

Take Action in Support of No New Leases

Carbon Capture and Storage: Developments in the Law of Pore Space in North Dakota

Carbon Capture and Storage: Industry Connections and Community Impacts

Carbon Capture and Storage: Fact or Fiction?

Pipeline Right-of-Ways: Making the Connection between Forest Fragmentation and the Spread of Lyme Disease in Southwestern Pennsylvania

FracTracker Finds Widespread Hydrocarbon Emissions from Active & Idle Oil and Gas Wells and Infrastructure in California

California Regulators Approve More Oil Well Permits Amid a Crisis of Leaking Oil Wells that Should be Plugged

An Insider Take on the Appalachian Hydrogen & CCUS Conference

Does Hydrogen Have a Role in our Energy Future?

Oil and Gas Brine in Ohio

PA Environment Digest Blog: Conventional Oil & Gas Drillers Dispose Of Drill Cuttings By ‘Dusting’

Real Talk on Pipelines

2021 Production from Pennsylvania’s Oil and Gas Wells

Mapping Energy Systems Impacted by the Russia-Ukraine War

Dimock residents working to protect water from a new threat: fracking waste

Implications of a 3,200-foot Setback in California

New Trends in Drilling Permit Approvals Take Shape in CA

Oil and Gas Drilling in California Legislative Districts

New Report: Fracking with “Forever Chemicals” in Colorado

Introducing: FracTracker’s comprehensive new Pennsylvania map!

New Letter from Federal Regulators Regarding how the Falcon has Been Investigated

US Army Corps Muskingum Watershed Plan ignores local concerns of oil and gas effects

Oil and gas companies use a lot of water to extract oil in drought-stricken California

Southeastern Texas Petrochemical Industry Needs 318 Billion Gallons of Water, but the US EPA Says Not So Fast

Chickahominy Pipeline project tries to exploit an apparent regulatory loophole

Map Update on Criminal Charges Facing Mariner East 2 Pipeline

It’s Time to Stop Urban Oil Drilling in Los Angeles

Infrastructure Networks in Texas

California Prisons are Within 2,500’ of Oil and Gas Extraction

New power plant proposal called senseless and wasteful by climate groups

Ongoing Safety Concerns over Shell’s Falcon Pipeline

New Neighborhood Drilling Permits Issued While California Fails to Act on Public Health Rules

The world is watching as bitcoin battle brews in the US


California Oil & Gas Drilling Permits Drop in Response to Decreased Permit Applications to CalGEM

California Denies Well Stimulation Permits

Mapping PFAS “Forever Chemicals” in Oil & Gas Operations

Updated National Energy and Petrochemical Map

Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania Fracking Story Map

Ohio & Fracking Waste: The Case for Better Waste Management

Pennsylvania Conventional Well Map Update

Impacts of 2020 Colonial Pipeline Rupture Continue to Grow

Gas Storage Plan vs. Indigenous Rights in Nova Scotia

Mapping Gathering Lines in Bradford County, Pennsylvania

Trends in fracking waste coming to New York State from Pennsylvania

2021 Pipeline Incidents Update: Safety Record Not Improving

New York State Oil & Gas Well Drilling: Patterns Over Time

Risky Byhalia Connection Pipeline Threatens Tennessee & Mississippi Health, Water Supply

Shell’s Falcon Pipeline Under Investigation for Serious Public Safety Threats

Kern County’s Drafted EIR Will Increase the Burden for Frontline Communities

Pennsylvania’s Waste Disposal Wells – A Tale of Two Datasets

California Oil & Gas Setbacks Recommendations Memo

Oil and Gas Wells on California State Lands

Industrial Impacts in Michigan: A Photo Essay & Story Map

People and Production: Reducing Risk in California Extraction

Documenting emissions from new oil and gas wells in California


FracTracker in the Field: Building a Live Virtual Map


Mapping Gathering Lines in Ohio and West Virginia

The North Dakota Shale Viewer Reimagined: Mapping the Water and Waste Impact

Falcon Pipeline Construction Releases over 250,000 Gallons of Drilling Fluid in Pennsylvania and Ohio

Systematic Racism in Kern County Oil and Gas Permitting Ordinance

Fracking Water Use in Pennsylvania Increases Dramatically

New Yorkers mount resistance against North Brooklyn Pipeline

California, Back in Frack

California Setback Analyses Summary

Air Pollution from Pennsylvania Shale Gas Compressor Stations – REPORT

New York State Oil & Gas Wells – 2020 Update

National Energy and Petrochemical Map

Governor Newsom Must Do More to Address the Cause of Oil Spill Surface Expressions

Oil & Gas Well Permits Issued By Newsom Administration Rival Those Issued Under Gov. Jerry Brown

Pipelines Continue to Catch Fire and Explode

The Hidden Inefficiencies and Environmental Costs of Fracking in Ohio

Fracking in Pennsylvania: Not Worth It

Fracking Threatens Ohio’s Captina Creek Watershed


How State Regulations Hold Us back and What Other Countries are doing about Fracking

New Method for Locating Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells is Tested in New York State


Abandoned Wells in Pennsylvania: We’re Not Doing Enough


The Underlying Politics and Unconventional Well Fundamentals of an Appalachian Storage Hub

Permitting New Oil and Gas Wells Under the Newsom Administration

Mapping the Petrochemical Build-Out Along the Ohio River

Impact of a 2,500′ Oil and Gas Well Setback in California

Production and Location Trends in PA: A Moving Target

The Falcon Public Monitoring Project

Release: The 2019 You Are Here map launches, showing New York’s hurdles to climate leadership

Idle Wells are a Major Risk

Literally Millions of Failing, Abandoned Wells

Wicked Witch of the Waste

The Growing Web of Oil and Gas Pipelines

Unnatural Disasters

Getting Rid of All of that Waste – Increasing Use of Oil and Gas Injection Wells in Pennsylvania

A Disturbing Tale of Diminishing Returns in Ohio

Pennsylvania Drilling Trends in 2018
216 Franklin St, Suite 400, Johnstown, PA 15901
Phone: +1 (717) 303-0403 | info@fractracker.org
FracTracker Alliance is a 501(c)3 non-profit: Tax identification number: 80-0844297
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!