Operators drilled 33,069 wells in Pennsylvania between 2007 and 2023, including 14,380 unconventional wells.
Key Findings
Conventional operators drilled 177 wells in 2023, a 96.3% drop from the peak in 2007.
Unconventional operators drilled 421 wells in 2023, a 78.5% decrease from the peak in 2011.
About 10% of the 102,652 violations issued by Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection between 2007 and 2023 were for failing to plug a well upon abandonment.
Unconventional production remains high, led by a relatively few number of highly productive wells.
Overview
The world of oil and gas is endlessly complex, and this reality is reflected in the various data sources that we can make use of to better understand the industry. While it is important for regulators to make a variety of data available to the public, and for that data to be accurate and understandable, it is also necessary to take a hard look at that data from time to time to understand some of the nuances of what is going on – or at least what the data reflect.
In this article, we are going to look at four trends in the oil and gas industry in Pennsylvania, including the number of drilled wells, violations that have been issued, hydrocarbon production, and waste generation. In addition to describing what we see in the available data, we will be as descriptive as possible about our methodology and point out instances where shortcomings in the data structure or the data itself keep us from fully answering basic questions that people routinely ask FracTracker regarding what is happening in their surroundings.
Drilled Wells
The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP) publishes data related to drilled wells in the Spud Data Report. Here, we have looked at the data from 2007 through 2013, and we can see that both conventional and unconventional drilling is well off of their respective peaks.
The peak number of conventional wells drilled was 2007, with 4,826 wells. This dropped off dramatically to just 52 conventional wells drilled in 2020, which was, of course, the height of the lockdown for COVID-19. For unconventional wells, the peak was a few years later, in 2011, with 2,958 wells. Although there is a dip for 2020, the lowest total in this category was 2007 with 113 wells drilled, right near the beginning of the exponential growth of drilling for this type of well. Overall, the peak was in 2007 with 4,939 wells, led by the huge number of conventional wells that year, and the fewest number of wells drilled in this timeframe was 528 wells in 2020.
The peak number of conventional wells drilled was 2007, with 4,826 wells. This dropped off dramatically to just 52 conventional wells drilled in 2020, which was, of course, the height of the lockdown for COVID-19. For unconventional wells, the peak was a few years later, in 2011, with 2,958 wells. Although there is a dip for 2020, the lowest total in this category was 2007 with 113 wells drilled, right near the beginning of the exponential growth of drilling for this type of well. Overall, the peak was in 2007 with 4,939 wells, led by the huge number of conventional wells that year, and the fewest number of wells drilled in this timeframe was 528 wells in 2020.
Figure 1. Trend of wells by type in Pennsylvania from 2007 to 2023.
Date | Conventional Wells | Unconventional Wells | All Wells |
2007 | 4,826 | 113 | 4,939 |
2008 | 4,648 | 333 | 4,981 |
2009 | 2,012 | 822 | 2,834 |
2010 | 1,693 | 1,600 | 3,293 |
2011 | 1,271 | 1,958 | 3,229 |
2012 | 1,024 | 1,351 | 2,375 |
2013 | 975 | 1,213 | 2,188 |
2014 | 807 | 1,369 | 2,176 |
2015 | 288 | 784 | 1,072 |
2016 | 93 | 502 | 595 |
2017 | 103 | 811 | 914 |
2018 | 137 | 780 | 917 |
2019 | 175 | 614 | 789 |
2020 | 52 | 476 | 528 |
2021 | 137 | 518 | 655 |
2022 | 215 | 575 | 790 |
2023 | 177 | 421 | 598 |
Table 1. Count of wells by type. In total, operators drilled 33,069 wells in Pennsylvania between 2007 and 2023, including 14,380 unconventional wells.
Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Data
This map shows oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania through July 2, 2024, and is based off of publicly available data from Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP).
View the map “Details” tab on the right side of the legend box to learn more and see the data sources or click on the map to explore the dynamic version of this data.
View Full Size Map | Updated 7/2/2024 | Map Tutorial
Conventional and Unconventional Drilling
What we now consider to be unconventional drilling in Pennsylvania got its start in 2004. Generally speaking, unconventional oil and gas wells are those that require a combination of horizontal drilling industrial-scaled hydraulic fracturing operations in order to extract hydrocarbons. In Pennsylvania, the official definition for unconventional wells became codified as a part of Act 13, a significant piece of legislation concerning oil and gas development that was signed into law in 2012.
In practice, this definition is largely based on the depth of the formation:
An unconventional gas well is a well that is drilled into an unconventional formation, which is defined as a geologic shale formation below the base of the Elk Sandstone or its geologic equivalent where natural gas generally cannot be produced except by horizontal or vertical well bores stimulated by hydraulic fracturing.
The Elk Sandstone is an Upper Devonian-aged formation from around 355 million years ago, making it more recent, and therefore more shallow, than the Marcellus Shale, which is Middle Devonian. The Utica Shale is an even older unconventional formation, dating to the Ordovician age, about 445 million years ago.
Less Common Configurations
Conventional wells tend to be relatively shallow and vertically drilled, while unconventional wells are usually deeper and drilled horizontally. However, because these definitions are largely based on whether or not wells are deeper than the Elk Sandstone, confusion can arise because it is possible to use unconventional techniques on shallower wells. Additionally, there are not any requirements for unconventional wells to be drilled horizontally, and some number of wells in both categories are indicated as deviated, or directional. Horizontal wells are considered to be a subset of deviated wells, where the angle of the well bore is greater than 80 degrees, but in Pennsylvania data, they are treated separately.
Figure 2. Trends of wells by type in Pennsylvania from 2007 to 2023.
Well Configuration | Deviated Unconventional Wells | Vertical Unconventional Wells | Deviated Conventional Wells | Horizontal Conventional Wells |
2007 | 95 | 14 | 3 | |
2008 | 1 | 215 | 18 | 1 |
2009 | 208 | 6 | ||
2010 | 195 | 22 | 1 | |
2011 | 124 | 23 | ||
2012 | 5 | 45 | 36 | |
2013 | 2 | 30 | 22 | 8 |
2014 | 22 | 14 | 6 | |
2015 | 1 | 15 | 1 | |
2016 | 1 | |||
2017 | 1 | |||
2018 | 1 | 1 | ||
2019 | 1 | 7 | ||
2020 | ||||
2021 | 1 | |||
2022 | 13 | |||
2023 | 8 | 2 |
Table 2. Count of wells by configuration in Pennsylvania 2007 to 2023.
At one point, it was a fairly popular practice for wells in unconventional formations such as the Marcellus Shale to be drilled vertically. Between 2007 and 2023, there have been 938 such wells in Pennsylvania. However, only four of these vertical unconventional wells have been drilled since 2015, and none at all from 2020 onward. It is likely that the reason these wells were drilled in the first place was to get a better understanding of the most productive locations for the target formations. Presumably, operators have the data that they need in this regard and no longer need to drill these almost exploratory production wells.
Deviated unconventional wells are relatively rare, with just nine wells (0.06%) of this type in the 17 years between 2007 and 2023. Deviated conventional wells are more common, with 198 such wells, but this still only amounts to about 1% of all conventional wells drilled during this time. In as much as deviated drilling could ever have been considered a fad in Pennsylvania, it seemed to go out of fashion after 2015 before seeing a bit of a resurgence in 2022 and 2023. Finally, operators have drilled 24 horizontal wells into conventional formations, or about 0.1% of conventional wells drilled in the time frame.
Violations
The Pennsylvania DEP Office of Oil and Gas Management issued 102,652 violations to operators between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2023. Determining which of these wells are associated with unconventional drilling operations is, of course, a bit nuanced. There is a data attribute of “unconventional”, for which there are three categories, including “No”, “Yes”, and those that are left blank. It is straightforward enough to assign the 55,987 “No” violations to conventional oil and gas wells and the 16,226 “Yes” violations to unconventional wells.
The confusion comes from the remaining 30,489 wells where this field was left blank. None of these violations have associated well API numbers, facility type descriptions, or county and municipal designations. Some of these violations are assessed to pipeline companies, such as the 7,099 infractions for ETC Northeast Pipeline LLC, for which 7,082 are associated with the infamous Revolution Pipeline or the Freedom to Revolution project. Another ETC pipeline company, ETC Northeast Fld Svc LLC, has another 490 violations for an assortment of smaller gathering lines. Note that not all pipeline violations in Pennsylvania are on this list, as the Office of Oil and Gas only has jurisdiction over gathering lines, while “Waterways & Wetlands (or their delegated county conservation districts) have oversight of transmission pipelines,” according to correspondence with a DEP official in 2023.
However, not all of the violations with blanks in the unconventional category are for midstream operations. It also includes an assortment of violations for both conventional and unconventional well operators in situations where the violations were assessed to the site in general, and not the well in particular. This includes instances of failing to submit production data to DEP, failure to obtain the proper variances to drill near wetlands or surface water, improper handling of waste materials, failure to prevent spills, and a variety of erosion and sediment related violations, to name a few of the 384 violation codes cited in this group.
Using the Site ID field in the violations dataset to match to a relatively comprehensive dataset of well locations, we can establish that 321 of the 30,489 violations in the blank category are associated with conventional drilling sites, while 7,728 are associated with unconventional drilling sites.
Figure 3. Pennsylvania oil and gas violations by site type from 2007 to 2023.
Just 6,146 of the total number of violations (6%) between 2007 and 2023 were the result of complaints, meaning that the lion’s share of such infractions were due to one of 20 different categories of internal inspections. Routine inspections were the most numerous with 31,679 (31%), followed by 21,537 (21%) follow-up inspections and 15,270 (15%) administrative file reviews.
“Administrative” Violations
Out of the total violations issued, 61,936 (60%) are categorized as “Environmental Health and Safety,” with the remaining 40,716 (40%) considered to be administrative in nature. Operators sometimes like to present these administrative violations as merely forgetting to dot their i’s and cross their t’s. Without minimizing the need for operators to follow the correct procedure, such as the 9,863 instances of failing to submit a production report, let’s take a look at some of these administrative violations to see if the characterization even makes sense.
Code | Violations |
210UNPLUG – Failure to plug a well upon abandonment | 3223 |
102.22 – Failure to achieve permanent stabilization of earth disturbance activity. | 695 |
78.56(1) – Pit and tanks not constructed with sufficient capacity to contain pollutional substances. | 327 |
78.56LINER – Improperly lined pit | 195 |
78.64 – Inadequate containment of oil tank | 261 |
Table 3. The most frequent administrative violations in the period between 2007 and 2023.
Clearly, there are some violation codes where the administrative designation makes little sense. Even more importantly, we see that dismissing all of the violations in this category as matter of paperwork is not accurate, either. And why should that be an acceptable excuse at any rate?
Environmental Health and Safety Violations
The 61,936 violations in the Environmental Health and Safety category are split up between 399 different categories. Many of these are rather similar in nature, and some even reference the same exact violation code number, but the wording has been changed over the years. Additionally, multiple related violations might be issued over the same incident in much the same way that a state trooper might cite a driver with both speeding and reckless driving at the same time. All of this makes it challenging to say conclusively which violation types are the most common, but it’s still worthwhile to look at some of the most commonly cited codes:
Code | Violations |
OGA3220(A) – PLUGGING REQUIREMENTS – Failure to plug the well upon abandoning it. | 7069 |
SWMA 301 – MANAGEMENT OF RESIDUAL WASTE – Person operated a residual waste processing or disposal facility without obtaining a permit for such facility from DEP. Person stored, transported, processed, or disposed of residual waste inconsistent with or unauthorized by the rules and regulations of DEP. | 3228 |
102.4 – Failure to minimize accelerated erosion, implement E&S plan, maintain E&S controls. Failure to stabilize site until total site restoration under OGA Sec 206(c)(d) | 2822 |
102.4(b)1 – EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS – Person conducting earth disturbance activity failed to implement and maintain E & S BMPs to minimize the potential for accelerated erosion and sedimentation. | 2611 |
102.11(a)1 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS – BMP AND DESIGN STANDARDS – Person failed to design, implement and maintain E & S BMPs to minimize the potential for accelerated erosion and sedimentation to protect, maintain, reclaim and restore water quality and existing and designated uses. | 2463 |
CSL 402(b) – POTENTIAL POLLUTION – Conducting an activity regulated by a permit issued pursuant to Section 402 of The Clean Streams Law to prevent the potential of pollution to waters of the Commonwealth without a permit or contrary to a permit issued under that authority by the Department. | 2329 |
102.5(m)4 – PERMIT REQUIREMENTS – GENERAL PERMITS – Person failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the E & S Control General Permit. | 2216 |
Table 4. Most frequent Environmental, Health, and Safety violations between 2007 and 2023. Note: E&S refers to erosion and sediment, and BMPs denote best management practices.
Failure to plug an abandoned well is by the violation that comes up the most often with 7,069 infractions, more than twice as frequent as the number two on the list, operating an oil and gas waste processing facility without a permit, with 3,228 counts. This makes sense, because if the oil and gas industry has an Achilles’ heel, it is the need to permanently plug oil and gas wells upon abandonment. If it has a second Achilles’ heel, it would be the need to appropriately deal with the waste stream.
Astute observers may recall that the failure to plug wells was also a leading category in the Administrative category of violations. This prompts the question of how often wells are issued both violations. The answer is surprisingly few – there are 240 wells where the API number appears in both columns out of 10,292 total violations, but the number could be as high as 256 wells when taking into account violations where the API number isn’t provided.
There are also some wells with the same violation issued multiple times. The worst of these is the Fischer 1 Well (API 031-00716), a conventional well in Clarion County issued to the operator “Miller Kim,” with 44 violations of this type. It is clear that some of these are due to the problem not being fixed upon multiple inspections, but 18 of these were assessed on November 1, 2017, indicating that there is probably some bugginess in the compliance report leading to an overcount in some situations. However, these sorts of situations seem to be relatively rare.
Pennsylvania Production in 2023
This map shows production from oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania in 2023 and is based off of publicly available data from Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP).
View the map “Details” tab on the right side of the legend box to learn more and see the data sources or click on the map to explore the dynamic version of this data.
View Full Size Map | Updated 7/2/2024 | Map Tutorial
Production
As we saw above, drilling for new unconventional wells in Pennsylvania peaked in 2011 with 1,958 new wells, while in 2023, the industry drilled less than one quarter of that amount, with just 421 such wells. However, the total production remains high.
Production Summary: Methodology
The production report contains a number of useful data fields, leading to a variety of ways in which the data can be sliced and diced. Each variant in that regard gives a glimpse into a different segment of the industry. In this section, we are looking at production data in the five-year period from 2019 to 2023. Because the difference between conventional and unconventional wells in Pennsylvania is so stark when it comes to production totals, that distinction is a primary category in our analysis, with the data for each year totaled in each of these groups, as well as overall sums.
The number of wells is an important consideration when talking about production trends. Here, we have totaled the count of all wells on the report as well as just the producing wells that reported some amount of gas, oil, or condensate in any given year. Because the unconventional data is reported monthly, a count of all of the wells on the report would actually overcount each well of that type by 12 times, assuming that such a well appeared on each monthly report throughout the year. To get around this, we used Excel’s Distinct Count function within their pivot tables tool.
The next three columns of data include totals of the three hydrocarbon production categories in the state, including gas, measured in thousands of cubic feet (Mcf); oil, measured in 42-gallon barrels (Bbl), and condensate, also measured in barrels.
To do this, analysts combine the energy output of the oil and gas into a barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) figure. There are a couple different standards for doing this. The Internal Revenue Service bases their tax calculations off of 5.8 million British thermal units, or roughly 5.8 Mcf equaling one barrel of oil in terms of energy output. The United States Geological Survey uses an even 6 Mcf for the conversion. This latter figure is used by the industry for most purposes, and we are using that conversion here.
Condensate is a collection of liquid hydrocarbons associated with natural gas, generally consisting of ethane, propane, butanes, and pentanes. These heavier hydrocarbons are frequently separated from the gas stream at facilities like cryogenic plants, but because this is the well production report, we are talking about only those hydrocarbons that are separated at the wellsite in this situation. Condensate is frequently thought of as equivalent to light sweet crude oil, so in terms of BOE, we have it set as equivalent to oil. Therefore, our overall formula for calculating BOE becomes:
(Mcf of Gas/6) + Bbl of Oil + Bbl of Condensate = BOE
Using this BOE calculation, we have also calculated the average BOE per day for wells in each category. Also needed for this calculation is the total number of production days. To accomplish this, we used the maximum number of reported production days for any of the three hydrocarbons within each reporting period. Typically, when a well reports multiple hydrocarbons, the same number of producing days will be used for each type, and if we were to include all categories, we would have monthly reporting periods for some wells with 60 or 90 days in it. This method prevents such an overcount.
Production Summary Results
Year | Well Type | Wells on Report | Producing Wells | Gas (Mcf) | Oil (Bbl) | Condensate (Bbl) | BOE | Total Producing Days | BOE/Day |
2019 | Conventional | 85,467 | 73,084 | 121,275,835 | 1,007,584 | 31,312 | 21,251,535 | 24,101,790 | 0.8817 |
Unconventional | 11,451 | 9,940 | 6,820,762,292 | 81,642 | 4,996,850 | 1,141,872,207 | 3,272,596 | 348.9194 | |
Total | 96,918 | 83,024 | 6,942,038,127 | 1,089,226 | 5,028,162 | 1,163,123,742 | 27,374,386 | 42.4895 | |
2020 | Conventional | 83,728 | 71,840 | 91,639,989 | 819,273 | 45,542 | 16,138,146 | 23,911,305 | 0.6749 |
Unconventional | 11,820 | 10,496 | 7,091,917,753 | 76,069 | 4,359,853 | 1,186,422,214 | 3,509,273 | 338.0821 | |
Total | 95,548 | 82,336 | 7,183,557,743 | 895,342 | 4,405,394 | 1,202,560,360 | 27,420,578 | 43.8561 | |
2021 | Conventional | 82,606 | 71,047 | 84,147,234 | 884,601 | 23,047 | 14,932,187 | 24,265,520 | 0.6154 |
Unconventional | 12,274 | 11,015 | 7,578,580,155 | 84,225 | 5,347,046 | 1,268,527,963 | 3,730,786 | 340.0163 | |
Total | 94,880 | 82,062 | 7,662,727,389 | 968,826 | 5,370,093 | 1,283,460,150 | 27,996,306 | 45.8439 | |
2022 | Conventional | 80,277 | 70,993 | 78,057,938 | 911,915 | 13,808 | 13,935,379 | 24,295,177 | 0.5736 |
Unconventional | 12,766 | 11,517 | 7,450,842,686 | 80,443 | 4,206,989 | 1,246,094,546 | 3,905,195 | 319.0864 | |
Total | 93,043 | 82,510 | 7,528,900,624 | 992,358 | 4,220,797 | 1,260,029,925 | 28,200,372 | 44.6813 | |
2023 | Conventional | 77,482 | 68,688 | 80,595,178 | 919,245 | 23,342 | 14,375,117 | 23,267,284 | 0.6178 |
Unconventional | 13,115 | 11,997 | 7,527,578,097 | 41,143 | 3,826,315 | 1,258,463,807 | 4,014,566 | 313.4744 | |
Total | 90,597 | 80,685 | 7,608,173,275 | 960,388 | 3,849,657 | 1,272,838,924 | 27,281,850 | 46.6552 |
Table 5. Summary of Pennsylvania production reports from 2019 to 2023.
Table 5 is a data-dense summary of production trends in Pennsylvania over the last five years. As with previous analyses, we can see that the vast majority of gas (98.9% in 2023) and condensate (99.3%) comes from unconventional wells. Conversely, almost all of the oil (95.7%) comes from conventional wells.
After years of exponential growth, unconventional gas production seems to have leveled off in recent years, with almost 7.6 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of production in 2021 and around 7.5 Tcf in 2022 and 2023.
There are a number of other variables worth considering when looking at production data. Many of these variables are included in the production report but could change over time, such as well operator and status. Others should remain consistent, such as spud date and latitude and longitude coordinates. In an attempt to get the most up to date information, we attempted to obtain this data from the most recent official inventory of more than 220,000 wells.
Unfortunately, there were still 2,350 wells on the production reports for 2023 that weren’t on the official inventory despite the latter having more than twice as many wells on it, as counted by API numbers. The result is that the data was joined with both methods, with 88,247 having the most updated data, and the remaining 2,350 wells pulling data from the production reports.
Conventional Wells
In 2023, there were 77,482 conventional wells on the production report. Wells of this type are reported annually. Because there have been instances of backfilled data on the production report in the past, it is worth noting that the data for this analysis was downloaded in May 2024.
While there are tens of thousands of wells in this category in Pennsylvania, the vast majority of them are very light producers. For tax purposes, there is a category known as stripper wells, which produce less than 15 barrels of oil or 90 Mcf of gas per day—wells that are either toward the end of their production life or were never very productive in the first place. Since it is common for wells in Pennsylvania to report hydrocarbons in more than one category, we have calculated the combined barrels of oil equivalent per day (BOE/Day) for these wells to see how many qualified for this very-low production category:
Production for Conventional Wells (2023) | ||
BOE/Day Range | Well Count | Percentage |
(blank) | 8,408 | 10.85% |
0 | 387 | 0.50% |
Between 0 and 15 | 68,613 | 88.55% |
Greater Than 15 | 74 | 0.10% |
Possible Stripper Wells | 77,408 | 99.90% |
All Conventional Wells | 77,482 | 100.00% |
Table 6. Investigation of conventional stripper wells in 2023.
Only 74 wells, or 0.1% of the total inventory, reported production in excess of the 15 BOE/Day threshold. It’s possible that some of the wells that have blanks or zeros are not technically stripper wells, if they are not yet in production or have a regulatory inactive status, for example. But at a minimum, 88.55% of conventional wells have production values that are below that cutoff.
In terms of production, there is an extreme outlier among the conventional wells. The “Hirhm Day 1” well in Washington County reported 8,753,268 Mcf of gas, good for a BOE/Day value of 3,996.9. The next closest wells are a pair of wells from Clarion County that both reported an even 100,000 Mcf over just 60 days of production, good for BOE/Day values of 277.8. Round numbers are not unheard of on the production report, by the way—five other conventional wells report 100,000 Mcf as well, but had more listed production days.
Figure 4. Daily production for conventional wells in Pennsylvania, arranged by spud date. Note that wells without a known spud date will default to 1/1/1800. Also note that one extreme outlier is excluded from the scatter plot.
Production values from conventional wells in the state do not appear to be a meaningful function of the well’s age, mostly because almost all of these wells are terrible producers. Those 74 wells with production greater than 15 BOE/Day seem to be fairly well scattered in terms of age. The outlier mentioned above was one of 12,441 with the default 1/1/1800 spud date.
With production statistics like these, it is easy to understand why conventional drilling has all but ceased in Pennsylvania in recent years. Additionally, it’s clear that there will be tens of thousands of wells needing to be plugged in the coming years.
Unconventional Wells
Production in unconventional wells in Pennsylvania is, of course, substantially different from the much smaller conventional operations. With a formation reporting more than 7.5 trillion cubic feet of gas, it seems strange to even entertain the idea of stripper wells in the same context as the clearly dying conventional well industry. But let’s look at it anyway, for the sake of consistency.
Production for Unconventional Wells (2023) | ||
BOE/Day Range | Well Count | Percentage |
(blank) | 1105 | 8.43% |
0 | 13 | 0.10% |
Between 0 and 15 | 722 | 5.51% |
Greater than 15 | 11275 | 85.97% |
Possible Stripper Wells | 1840 | 14.03% |
All Unconventional Wells | 13,115 | 100.00% |
Table 7. Investigation of Pennsylvania’s unconventional stripper wells in 2023.
And indeed, around 86% of unconventional wells produce more than this threshold. Still, it is interesting that at least 5.51% of these newer wells are already producing less than 15 BOE/Day, a number that could swell to 14.03% if blanks and zeroes are included.
Figure 5. Daily production for unconventional wells in Pennsylvania, arranged by spud date. Note that wells drilled into unconventional formations before the creation of the classification were retroactively assigned to the category.
Generally speaking, the expectation is for wells to produce high quantities of hydrocarbons in the earlier stages, decreasing swiftly over time, a phenomenon known as a decline curve. While the number of records shown necessitated showing the years on the vertical axis, if you mentally rotate the chart above counterclockwise by 90 degrees, you can get a rough idea of what decline curves for this type of well would look like, and the dropoff is fairly steep.
Let’s take a look at the data another way, by creating a histogram.
Figure 6. Histogram showing the number of wells in production groups with increments of 250 BOE/Day. Data labels have been added to show the number in each group because many appear blank at this scale.
Unconventional wells in the state obviously have some real gushers. The well producing the most gas in 2023 is the perhaps aptly named King Hippo well in Greene County, with 10,071,786.47 Mcf, or just over 10 billion cubic feet from a single well. This is almost as much gas as was sent to residential consumers in Vermont and New Hampshire combined last year, although to be fair, that part of the country often relies on other fossil fuels for heating purposes.
Even so, wells of this sort are clear outliers: 8,014 of the unconventional wells, or 61%, produced less than 250 BOE/Day in 2023, while 10,975 (84%) produced 1,000 BOE/Day or less. The 1,035 wells yielding more than 1,000 BOE/Day account for less than 9% of the state’s unconventional inventory.
2023 Unconventional Gas Production by BOE/Day | ||||
Category | Well Count | Pct. Of Wells | Mcf | Pct. Of Gas |
Less than 250 BOE/Day | 8,015 | 66.7% | 1,612,620,819 | 21.4% |
Between 250 and 1000 | 2,962 | 24.7% | 2,873,775,566 | 38.2% |
More than 1000 | 1,035 | 8.6% | 3,041,181,711 | 40.4% |
Total (Excludes Blanks) | 12,012 | 100.0% | 7,527,578,097 | 100.0% |
Table 8. Total gas production for unconventional wells in 2023, arranged by BOE/Day.
In Table 8, we can see that wells producing less than 250 BOE/Day account for two-thirds of the wells (excluding blank values from Table 7, but including zeroes), but those wells only produce around 21% of the gas. While certainly more productive than their conventional counterparts, most of these wells are probably close to the end of their life. As of June 6, 2024, 1,299 unconventional wells have already been plugged in the state, amounting to about 9% of wells of this newer type that have been drilled to date, as indicated by the presence of a spud date in the well inventory. Clearly, the deciding factors for when to plug unconventional wells are different.
This trend may tie in directly with the decreasing number of wells drilled in the state that we saw in the drilled wells trend above, as well. To put this into some context, let’s take a quick look at some national data for a moment, focusing in on gas storage over the same period of time.
Figure 7. Gas storage withdrawals and injections in the United States from 2019 to 2023.
We can see over the last five years that the gas withdrawals (green) and injections (orange) are relatively close to one another. If we were to look at this data monthly instead, we would see a recurring trend of building up stocks over the warm summer months which then get used over the winter months as homes and businesses use the fuel for heat. The red line in Figure 7 shows net withdrawals. These numbers are negative for three of the past five years, meaning that more gas was injected than consumed from storage. Taking all five years into account, this amounts to an increase of 865,199 billion cubic feet of storage.
This makes the trend of drilling fewer wells understandable, because producing additional gas would also require an increase in additional infrastructure, which hardly makes sense to build out.
Case Study: The Midas 6M Well
As we can see from the analysis of trends in the Drilled Wells and this Production section, production values remain high for unconventional wells in Pennsylvania even though the number of new drilled wells has been on the decline for almost 15 years. How can this be?
The short answer is that the wells that they are drilling are much more intensive than in the early days of the Marcellus Shale. Here are some claims from Olympus Energy, operator of the Midas 6M well in Plum Borough, Allegheny County, for some additional context.
“Olympus has announced the successful execution of the Midas 6M, a Marcellus Shale well with a completed lateral length of 20,060 feet, setting a new record for the longest horizontal wellbore drilled and completed in the Marcellus Shale according to public data….
“In 2009, the average lateral length for Marcellus Shale wells drilled in Pennsylvania was approximately 3,500 feet. Technological advancements in unconventional drilling improved operational efficiencies over the next decade, driving that average up to approximately 9,000 feet in 2019. The lateral of the Midas 6M is 11,000 feet longer and spans nearly 3.8 miles.”
So, we are looking at a lateral length that is 5.7 times longer than the average unconventional well from 2009. Let’s take a look at the production for this specific well to see how it turned out.
Figure 8. Gas production of Olympus Energy’s Midas 6M well in Plum Borough, Allegheny County. Figures are thousands of cubic feet (Mcf).
Midas 6M hasn’t produced any oil or condensate, so we just looked at gas production here. It was completed in October 2020, so we are included that month through the most recently available, April 2024: 43 months in total. This well follows the overall trend of peak production in the first few months of the well’s life cycle, which then proceeds to decline over time. In this case, the top producing months were December 2020, with 1,018 million cubic feet (MMcf), and January 2021, with about 1,038 MMcf. By April 2024, that figure had dropped to around 214 MMcf, a little less than 21% of the peak production. There appears to be an anomaly in the decline curve between March and June of 2023. While we didn’t look at this in terms of BOE/Day, there is a clue in the production data where that would be relevant. In April of that year, where the visible dip occurs, the well was only in production for 15 days, so only half of the days. Whatever gas was held back seemed to come out the following month, which saw the highest production total since April of the previous year.
It can’t be denied that this well has been highly productive, giving up around 18.6 billion cubic feet of gas so far. And, if we want to relate it to the above analysis of BOE/Day, it is still in the highest category, with 1,187 BOE/Day for April 2024, as one might expect from a well with a record-setting lateral that has been in service for less than four years. But let’s take a look at what was required to make this happen.
Unconventional wells in Pennsylvania, as with many states, are required to disclose some data about hydraulic fracturing operations to an industry-funded registry known as FracFocus. Another site, Open-FF, is dedicated to making the information more easily accessible and understandable to the public. For example, there are menus where you can search for wells by geography or operator. What’s more, in FracFocus reports, operators proclaim the amount of each chemical in terms of a percentage of the overall mass of the fracking fluid, and Open-FF converts that into pounds, which most people would find more useful than percentages.
Each well in the inventory has a summary page on Open-FF, including the Midas 6A well. At the top, we can see that the well used about 39.7 million gallons in the fracking operations, which does not include other uses on site, such as dust control. In context of the frack job, this amounts to 1,978 gallons per linear foot of the lateral. This is equal to 264.4 cubic feet per foot of pipe—imagine a solid cylinder of water 18.35 feet in diameter and 3.8 miles long. That’s how much water that is.
The well also used 52,775,657 pounds of quartz sand in the frack job. This works out to 26,388 tons. That works out to 2,630 pounds, or about 1.3 tons, per linear foot. If you went to Home Depot and purchased a pallet of play sand, you would be about 70 pounds short of the amount of sand used for one foot of lateral pipe, so toss another bag and a half on top. As with the water, we would need to line this amount for each foot in the 3.8 mile length.
We also know that this well consumed 796,311 pounds of hydrochloric acid, or just about 40 pounds per linear foot. Industrial-grade hydrochloric acid is just about ten pounds per gallon, so you’ll need to pick up four gallons per foot on this epic Home Depot run.
Also added was 53,881 pounds of other chemicals, and while this is much more modest in terms of quantity, these are items of concern in other ways. Some of these cause health effects such as serious eye damage and nausea, headaches, and shortness of breath, while others are described as, “very toxic to aquatic life.”
Waste
In the production section of this article, we went into considerable detail about the difference between conventional and unconventional wells. A similar dynamic exists for the waste stream, but is so extreme that it can be summed up in a basic chart. We are also going to focus mostly on just 2023 waste data so that we can get into some details available in the report without making endlessly complex tables and charts.
Well Type | Liquid – Barrels | Liquid – Percent | Solid – Tons | Solid – Percent |
Conventional | 939,756 | 1.2% | 17,707 | 1.9% |
Unconventional | 79,621,548 | 98.8% | 911,509 | 98.1% |
Total | 80,561,305 | 100.0% | 929,216 | 100.0% |
Table 9. Waste produced by conventional and unconventional wells in Pennsylvania in 2023. Unconventional wells accounted for 98.8% of the total liquid waste and 98.1% of the total solid waste.
When we convert the units in Table 9 into terms that we are more familiar with, we see that conventional wells cumulatively produced a lot of waste, with more than 39.4 million gallons of liquids and 35.4 million pounds of solid waste. And yet, these amount to a figurative drop in the bucket when compared to the overall totals of almost 3.4 billion gallons of liquid waste and 1.6 billion pounds of solid waste. Overall, the smaller number of unconventional wells are generating about 51 times as much solid waste and 85 times as much solid waste as their conventional counterparts.
While the purpose of this discussion is focused on waste volumes and movements, it is important to take a moment to consider the impact of these substances. In November 2023, the League of Women Voters and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of public health hosted the 11th annual Shale and Public Health Conference, for which discussions around waste are always a major topic. This includes not only the vast array of chemicals that are pumped into wells that may impact workers and nearby residents, but also many of the contaminants that are present in the deep formations that are being drilled into, including problematic heavy metals such as arsenic and radioactive substances such as radium. Some of these contaminants become concentrated due to how humans interact with the waste stream; for radium and other radioactive waste, this becomes known as technologically enhanced radioactive materials, or TENORM.
Waste Generation
The way the production reports are set up is a bit more complicated than liquid versus solid waste. There are 20 different waste categories in all, but each of them are reported in either 42-gallon barrels, which we frequently lump together as liquid waste as a matter of shorthand, or in tons, which we consider as solid waste for the same reasons.
Waste Category | Liquid – Barrels | Solid – Tons |
Brine Co-Product (in Barrels) | 791 | |
Drill Cuttings (in Tons) RWC 810 | 794,083 | |
Drilling Fluid Waste (in Barrels) RWC 803 | 552,561 | |
Drilling Fluid Waste (in Tons) RWC 803 | 3,067 | |
Filter Socks (in Tons) RWC 812 | 208 | |
Other Oil & Gas Wastes (in Barrels) RWC 899 | 3,285,744 | |
Other Oil & Gas Wastes (in Tons) RWC 899 | 17,928 | |
Produced Fluid (in Barrels) RWC 802 | 76,612,541 | |
Produced Fluid (in Tons) RWC 802 | 53,436 | |
Servicing Fluid (in Barrels) RWC 808 | 49,945 | |
Servicing Fluid (in Tons) RWC 808 | 1,834 | |
Soil Contaminated by Oil & Gas Related Spills (in Barrels) RWC 811 | 262 | |
Soil Contaminated by Oil & Gas Related Spills (in Tons) RWC 811 | 34,413 | |
Spent Lubricant Waste (in Barrels) RWC 809 | 120 | |
Synthetic Liner Materials (in Tons) RWC 806 | 10,673 | |
Unused Fracturing Fluid Waste (in Barrels) RWC 805 | 32,132 | |
Unused Fracturing Fluid Waste (in Tons) RWC 805 | 809 | |
Waste comment only | ||
Waste Water Treatment Sludge (in Barrels) RWC 804 | 27,209 | |
Waste Water Treatment Sludge (in Tons) RWC 804 | 12,765 | |
Total | 80,561,305 | 929,216 |
Table 10. Waste produced by conventional and unconventional wells in Pennsylvania in 2023. Waste by type generated from Pennsylvania wells in 2023. This data is self-reported by operators to Pennsylvania DEP.
As we browse the various waste categories, it becomes apparent that some of the waste falls a bit in between the classical liquid and solid categories. For example, the last two categories are both wastewater treatment sludge, of which there were 27,209 barrels and 12,756 tons reported during 2023. There are a number of other categories where waste gets split in this fashion, including drilling fluid waste, other oil and gas wastes, produced fluid, servicing fluid, soil contaminated by oil and gas related spills, and unused fracturing fluid waste.
It’s not entirely clear why some of these categories are determined in one direction or the other, but it would seem reasonable to imagine that such waste products are often sludgy in nature, and some determination, whether the percentage of liquid or a certain suspended solids threshold requires the declaration in one form or another.
It’s probably not worthwhile to get overly bogged down on this particular issue for a couple of reasons. First, some sort of shorthand is helpful when there are 20 different categories of waste to consider, even if some of it is a bit ambiguous. And second, both the liquid and solid waste categories have primary drivers which account for the majority of the waste. For liquid waste, the 76,612,541 barrels of produced fluids in 2023 accounted for 95% of waste reported in barrels , while for solid waste, the 794,803 tons of reported drill cuttings accounted for more than 85% of the total waste reported in tons. Therefore, we see that these categories are fairly accurate, even if there is some degree of ambiguity.
Waste Disposal
The waste reports also allow us some understanding of how the waste was disposed of, including the method of disposal and the destination. Let’s take a look at those same waste totals from 2023, but this time from the lens of how it was disposed of.
Disposal Method | Liquid – Barrels | Solid – Tons |
Cent Waste Trt Fac NPDES Discharge | 45,359 | |
Centralized Treatment Plant For Recycle | 921,118 | 695 |
Injection Disposal Well | 4,939,001 | 3,180 |
Landfill | 440 | 819,238 |
On Site Encapsulation | 37 | |
On Site Pit | 182 | |
Public Sewage Treatment Plant | 201,794 | 572 |
Residual Waste Processing Facility | 24,621,510 | 67,223 |
Residual Waste Transfer Facility | 374,318 | 5,683 |
Reuse (At Well Pad) | 36,112,379 | 17,063 |
Reuse At A Conventional Well Site In Pa | 114,357 | 14,041 |
Reuse At A Well Pad Outside Pennsylvania | 3,162,377 | 765 |
Reuse Other Than Road Spreading | 8,651 | 756 |
Road Spreading | 726 | |
Storage Pending Disposal Or Reuse | 7,544,646 | |
Surface Impoundment | 2,514,410 | |
Total | 80,561,305 | 929,216 |
Table 11. Waste totals from Pennsylvania oil and gas wells in 2023 by disposal method.
Of the 16 disposal methods listed above, there are a few things worth pointing out. The largest single category for disposal of liquid waste is reuse at a well pad with about 36.2 million barrels, accounting for 44.8% of the volume. If we include conventional and out of state well sites, that figure goes up to about 39.4 million barrels, or 48.9% of the liquid waste.
One of the unique features of the Pennsylvania waste reports is that they also inform us where the waste was sent after leaving the well pad. To accomplish this, there are two sets of latitude and longitude coordinates, one for disposal or treatment facilities, and one for well pads, when a portion of the waste is reused in another fracking operation.
Pennsylvania Waste in 2023
This map shows waste from oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania in 2023 and is based off of publicly available data from Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The data have also been re-arranged to show facilities accepting that waste stream.
View the map “Details” tab on the right side of the legend box to learn more and see the data sources or click on the map to explore the dynamic version of this data.
View Full Size Map | Updated 7/2/2024 | Map Tutorial
The next two highest totals include the 24.6 million barrels (30.6%) sent to residual waste processing facilities and 7.5 million barrels (9.3%) sent to storage pending disposal or reuse. This report gives us little indication what happened to the waste stream after leaving these facilities. Contaminants removed from treatment facilities would then become waste that would need to be treated in some other way, and any runoff from the facilities would almost certainly contain contaminants as well. Waste sent to temporary storage sites could have gone nearly anywhere, and such movements would not be tracked on this report. The remaining 4.9 million barrels (6.1%) were sent to injection wells for disposal.
Far down on the list, 726 barrels were sent for road spreading, even though this practice is not authorized in Pennsylvania. Because not all of the waste stays in-state, it’s worthwhile to go into a bit more detail here. We can see that 385 barrels were spread in North Harmony in Chautauqua County, New York, and 240 barrels were spread in Clymer, also in Chautauqua County. While these are outside of DEP’s jurisdiction, 100 barrels were spread in Venango Township in Erie County, as well as – according to the data—a single barrel being spread on the roads in Columbus Township in Warren County.
Of course, there are other ways that oil and gas wastes could be used for this purpose. Even if we consider the self-reported data to be 100% accurate, if we include the destinations listed above where this dataset loses track of the chain of custody, such as temporary storage facilities or treatment facilities. Lax regulations allow drillers to declare these toxic brines to be a commercial co-product, essentially with the waive of a magical wand. When such products are purchased by municipalities and other road authorities, community streets become dumping grounds for oil and gas waste, along with the streams that the storm runoff drains into.
For solid waste, 819,238 tons (88.2%) were sent to landfills, followed by 67,223 tons (7.2%) sent to residual waste processing facilities,and 31,869 tons (3.4%) were sent to various well sites for reuse, including conventional wells, unconventional well pads, and out-of-state locations. Lesser amounts were sent to other destinations, including transfer facilities and even injection wells.
Matching Receiving Site Locations: A Methodological Journey
One of the unique features of the Pennsylvania oil and gas waste reports is that it allows us to follow where the waste went after it leaves the well sites. Well, sort of. These reports are certainly structured to provide this information, and there is a significant amount of detail available, but in practice, it is often missing, conflicting, difficult to conclusively match, or downright wrong. Overall, we can match about 80% of the receiving sites with a decent amount of effort. This section is methodological in nature, and while we think that it is important to document, we also acknowledge that not everyone enjoys getting this far into the weeds, so please feel free to skip to the next section if this isn’t your cup of tea.
I’m not sure why DEP decided to split this into two different sets of location data, but in theory, this shouldn’t be a big obstacle, as they can be combined in a spreadsheet application such as Excel. Unfortunately, this isn’t as straightforward as one would hope. For one thing, it is clear that operators will sometimes use the well pad of the site where the waste is generated instead of the destination well pad. For another, in many cases, these values are just left blank, and therefore aren’t very useful. In fact, of the 5,246 sites in the official listing of sites accepting oil and gas waste from Pennsylvania wells, 1,042 (20%) don’t include location data at all. And more than once in the past, we have encountered facility location data that is just plain wrong.
Addresses exist, but when you start looking these up on Google Maps, they are frequently office locations. Some of the facilities are lost causes. When waste is reused at a well pad in another state, all the report will say is, “Reuse at Utah Well Pad,” or something similar. Other states receiving some amount of Pennsylvania oil and gas waste include Montana, California, Texas, and of course closer states like Ohio—20 different states in all. It’s also understandable that an exact location can’t be listed when waste is used for road spreading.
However, we may be able to match many of the missing 1,042 facilities with some extra work. In 984 of these cases, waste is sent to different well pads in Pennsylvania, and the records include a well pad ID number. Well pad ID numbers exist on the main inventory of wells, but are sporadically used there. But there is yet another dataset where we can find this information.
While this seemed like a clever, but annoying workaround, it turned out to only be annoying. The well pad ID numbers from the waste facility report are not the same as the well pad ID numbers on the well pad report, in many cases. For example, Olympus’ Apollo B well pad has an ID number of 154472 on the facility report but 154488 on the well pad report. The Bechtel 488 1X, 488 2H, and 674 well pads don’t even exist on the well pad report, and the Ches to Ur 12” Pipeline Project has a well pad ID number on the waste facility report, but is a pipeline, so it obviously isn’t a well pad at all. In all, this exercise resulted in zero additional matches.
While sites like Apollo B could be filled in manually, with 1,042 out of a possible 5,246 waste recipients missing location data even after these steps, I think it’s time to say that DEP’s recordkeeping system fails its audit on this particular point. The issue with multiple ID numbers for well pads appears to be widespread, and in fact, some of the waste that went to Apollo B is reflected on our waste facility map, because the correct ID number was used some of the time. In all, this situation seems to be unintentional but it has the effect of significantly reducing the number of waste sites that we are able to find location data for in a systematic way.
On the other hand, DEP does deserve some credit here, because this particular analysis isn’t even available in other states because they have no public inventory tracking where the waste goes after it leaves the well site. In fact, the details included on the waste report are impressive in other ways as well. Many states don’t publish waste data at all, and those that do frequently just have a single column in the production report accounting for barrels of liquid waste, with no details on the kind of waste or the ability to record solid waste such as drill cuttings or filter socks at all.
Case Study: The Midas 6M Well
Since we gave a hard look at the Midas 6M well in the production section, let’s go back to it here to get a better understanding of how the two are related, at least for this specific well in eastern Allegheny County with a very long lateral.
Waste Category | Liquid (Barrels) | Solid (Tons) |
Drill Cuttings (in Tons) RWC 810 | 2,375 | |
Drilling Fluid Waste (in Barrels) RWC 803 | 6,719 | |
Filter Socks (in Tons) RWC 812 | 2 | |
Other Oil & Gas Wastes (in Barrels) RWC 899 | 1,104 | |
Produced Fluid (in Barrels) RWC 802 | 120,070 | |
Produced Fluid (in Tons) RWC 802 | 202 | |
Synthetic Liner Materials (in Tons) RWC 806 | 31 | |
Grand Total | 127,893 | 2,610 |
Table 12. Waste generated from the Midas 6M between March 2020 and April 2024.
Because the well was completed in October 2020, we started the production analysis in that month. However, the completion process comes after the drilling, which started in March of that year, so the waste analysis goes back a few months further. In 50 months of operation, this single well has reported generating 127,893 barrels (5.4 million gallons) of liquid waste, and 2,610 tons (5.2 million pounds) of solid waste.
A total of 120,070 barrels, or 94% of the total liquid waste is produced fluids, with drilling fluid waste, or flowback fluids, accounting for about 5%, with the remaining 1% described as “other oil & gas wastes.” For solid waste, 2,375 tons of drill cuttings were reported, accounting for about 91% of the total. This is followed by about 8% of produced fluids reported in tons, presumably fairly sludgy in nature, and a smaller amount of liners and filter socks.
Let’s take a look at waste generation over time.
Figure 9. Sites accepting waste from the Midas 6M well.
As with the production reports, we can see that waste spikes in the early months of the wells life cycle and steadily decreases over time. Almost all of the solid waste occurred during the drilling phase, which makes sense, as they are predominantly drill cuttings. There are a few small showings of solid waste after what is seen on this chart that don’t appear at this scale, but almost all of the solids were generated by November 2020.
Waste from this one well was shipped off to 37 different destinations, including an assortment of landfills, residual waste processing centers, well pads for reuse, injection wells, and other well sites. A little under 91% of the liquid waste and 96% of the solid waste remained in-state, with the remainder finding its way to facilities in Ohio. Interestingly, none of the waste was apparently sent to Penneco’s Sedat 3A wastewater disposal well, located in the same community as the Midas 6M well.
Figure 10. Sites accepting waste from the Midas 6M well.
A total of 11,967.15 barrels of liquid waste were sent to the Northstar Lucky #4 SWIW (saltwater injection well) in Youngstown, Ohio. Assuming the drivers took the most direct route with tolls, that would be 120 one-way trips of 63.4 miles each, or 7,608 road miles, assuming the use of 100 barrel tanker trucks. This does not include trips to the Midas 6M site, which could have come from anywhere.
Of course, this is the waste being shipped to one of the 37 sites on this list, which itself represents just one of 14,240 unconventional wells drilled between January 2007 and early June 2024. Without getting into issues of the efficacy of treatment options, the sheer scale of moving the waste around is a major impact that is often not given enough consideration in discussions of the overall impact of fracking.
Conclusion
It’s always a challenge to present detailed data without getting too lost in the weeds. In this case, I fear that it was not possible, and therefore I feel as though readers who have made it this far are to be commended for their fortitude. But there was a lot of ground to cover between drilling trends, violations, production and waste for an inventory of just under a quarter million well sites.
In all, we’ve looked at trends of 33,069 drilled wells over 17 years. We also examined the relationship between unconventional wells and horizontal drilling, specifically by looking at less frequent combinations of data in these two fields, revealing that operators are no longer drilling vertical wells in unconventional formations but do occasionally drill horizontally in conventional formations.
We also looked at a whopping 102,652 violations that have been assessed by DEP over 17 years. We’ve examined all sorts of nuances that are important in the real world, such as when operators attempt to dismiss administrative violations as a simple matter of dotting i’s and crossing t’s, and noted that the most frequent violation code for both the administrative and environmental health and safety categories was a failure to plug a well upon abandonment – accounting for around 10% of all violations in that time frame.
In order to analyze production, we calculated the barrels of oil equivalence per day (BOE/Day), which in turn allowed us to determine that between 88.5% and 99.9% of conventional wells are low-producing stripper wells, depending on whether or not we count wells where operators left the production value blank. We’ve looked at the unconventional wells too, noting that they tend to be plugged much sooner than their conventional counterparts when it comes to a diminishing BOE/Day figure, and that a relatively few amount of high-production wells are skewing data trends in a manner similar to billionaires skewing per capita income figures.
We looked at waste generation and mapped out the sites that received the waste, at least as far as we could.
In addition to all of the statewide metrics, we also took a closer look at a single “super lateral” well, Olympus’ Midas 6M well, where the horizontal portion is 3.8 miles long. Not only did we look at the production and waste of this single well, but we also took a deep dive into FracFocus and Open-FF data to get a better understanding of what was required to extract hydrocarbons from this one well, including seven months of drilling and fracking, almost 40 million gallons of water, and 53 million pounds of sand. We even mapped the 37 different sites where waste from this one well was shipped.
We’ve identified areas where the available data could be improved, such as including shapefiles of laterals, easy access to lateral lengths, and location coordinates for violations. We’ve also looked at areas where the reliability could be improved, such as location data for sites accepting waste.
Above all, we’ve been very thorough with explaining our data methods along the way, even including some of the dead ends that we’ve tried. While some of this content is probably not of interest to the general public, we felt it was important to document the experience of people actually making use of this data.
After all, making data available and useful for the public is the entire point of transparency. People who live near a waste site have a right to know what is being pumped into permeable geologic strata beneath their homes, for example. People with private water supplies who live near well sites should be able to know which chemicals to look out for when they get their wells tested. And communities that are considering permit actions from operators should be able to look into the data to see if the company takes their obligations seriously or not.
Much of this is possible in Pennsylvania. Its numerous data sources offer data that is rare or even unheard of in other states. In no other state is it possible to track the shipment of waste from each individual well site, even if we can only do that four times out of five with the available data. The level of detail on the published compliance report is unrivaled anywhere else, too, with the exception of including those pesky location coordinates.
I’m sure that keeping all of these datasets accurate and up to date is a considerable task, but considering the multitude of impacts reflected in that data, it remains incumbent on the Department to be as transparent as possible if we are going to allow these harmful activities to continue within the Commonwealth.
Join the Conversation
Stay Informed
Support Our Work
FracTracker Alliance helps communicate the risks of oil and gas and petrochemical development to advance just energy alternatives that protect public health, natural resources, and the climate.
By contributing to FracTracker, you are helping to make tangible changes, such as decreasing the number of oil and gas wells in the US, protecting the public from toxic and radioactive chemicals, and stopping petrochemical expansion into vulnerable communities.
Your donations help fund the sourcing and analysis of new data so that we can keep you informed and continually update our resources.
Please donate to FracTracker today as a way to advocate for clean water, clean air, and healthy communities.
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!