An open letter released by Shannon Smith, executive director of FracTracker Alliance, opposes an agreement announced in November between Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro and CNX, a major natural gas producer based in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania.
Overview
The statement cites numerous concerns about the collaboration, including the discord between the state’s purported environmental responsibility and the affiliation with CNX, specifically focusing on voluntary reporting over mandatory regulations.
There are over 700 unconventional wells operated by CNX in the state, including wells that have been proposed, plugged, or never materialized.
CNX has accrued over 400 violations since the 43rd statewide Grand Jury report according to data from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP).
Letter to Governor Shapiro
Dear Governor Shapiro,
I am writing on behalf of FracTracker Alliance to express deep concern and dismay regarding the recent announcement of the partnership between your office and CNX, a company involved in shale gas production. As a concerned Pennsylvania resident and advocate for environmental responsibility, the details surrounding this partnership raise numerous questions and concerns.
The collaboration with CNX, especially with a focus on voluntary reporting, is a perplexing move. It is difficult to perceive this as a step toward progress, particularly when mandatory reporting should be a fundamental requirement set by Pennsylvania regulators. Praising CNX for opting into what should be a regulatory mandate is a cause for skepticism rather than celebration.
The timing of this announcement, coming shortly after the resignation of PA DEP Secretary Negrin, raises doubts about the state’s capacity to effectively manage such a partnership. Additionally, the statement made by CNX lauding the hydrogen hub funding announcement and stressing the need for a clear 45V hydrogen production tax seems incongruent with the essence of accountable and responsible environmental practices.
Your assertion that this partnership embodies the “most responsible, sustainable way” of extracting and processing natural gas in Pennsylvania contradicts the sentiments of esteemed environmental and community advocates. Center for Coalfield Justice, for example, has described this move as a “slap in the face.” It’s crucial to highlight that this partnership neither provides answers to public health concerns nor instills accountability. The extensive research available, exemplified by recent publications like The Compendium of Scientific, Medical, and Media Findings Demonstrating Risks and Harms of Fracking, already sheds light on the associated risks and health outcomes including cancer, asthma, heart problems, preterm birth, low birth rate, birth defects, respiratory diseases, skin rashes, and mental health impacts.
Rather than drilling two new wells to conduct a study of the public health and environmental impacts of fracking, your office should make use of the ample data and reporting that is already occurring. Perpetuating fossil fuel extraction is not an environmentally friendly practice.
Furthermore, as an organization actively involved in promoting community-led air monitoring initiatives around shale gas development, we find the pathway for regulatory compliance unclear. FracTracker was recently awarded nearly $1 million from the US EPA to expand preexisting community-led air monitoring initiatives in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia. Instead of providing unwarranted advantages to a fossil fuel company, I strongly urge that your administration engages with groups working towards cleaner air through scientific means, data analysis, and technology. It’s imperative to understand and integrate the current air monitoring networks and collaborate with the numerous community advocates striving for a healthier environment.
The concerns about cumulative impacts of pre-existing polluting infrastructure, the necessity for more stringent regulations based on community-led air monitoring data, and unresolved issues related to CNX violations after the 43rd statewide Grand Jury report remain unaddressed. The partnership’s limited policy changes, the absence of clarity around the Halliburton Loophole, and the apparent inadequacy of setbacks raise serious doubts about the intended positive impact of this alliance.
FracTracker feels that increasing the setback for unconventional drilling from homes from 500 feet to 600 feet for this company is barely an improvement worth mentioning. After all, your office and the 43rd Statewide Grand Jury proposed a distance of 2,500 feet to protect Pennsylvanians from the harms of the industry just a few short years ago. Incidentally, the larger distance is also the state’s presumed liability distance for ground water contamination from unconventional gas development that was established in Act 13 of 2012.
With over 400 violations accrued by CNX since the 43rd statewide Grand Jury report, it is baffling that the partnership appears to prioritize voluntary self-reporting. This stance negates the well-documented violations and the urgency for stricter regulatory oversight. In 2021, as Attorney General, you charged CNX with environmental crimes, to which they pleaded no contest. What is the explanation for placing your trust in the same company that you rightfully sought to hold accountable for environmental crimes?
The need for greater transparency in methodology, technology, and overall data quality cannot be overlooked. This partnership, with only a minuscule sample size of two CNX wells, fails to address the larger context of the state’s numerous oil and gas wells and the associated issues concerning data transparency.
Governor Shapiro, as an advocate for environmental health and safety, I implore you to reconsider this partnership with CNX. The well-being of our communities and the environment should supersede any political or corporate interests. This decision, which seemingly disregards the concerns and extensive research of environmental advocates, does not align with the expectations of those you represent.
FracTracker requests that your office provide a comprehensive clarification regarding the intentions and goals of this partnership, as well as the technical details and methodology surrounding the planned monitoring. Moreover, I am open to discussing how community-led monitoring initiatives can be best utilized to curb emissions and hold operators accountable. Given our organization’s expertise and the significant grant awarded by the EPA, we stand ready to contribute constructively to this dialogue.
Please take into consideration the gravity of the concerns raised and the potential ramifications of this alliance. I am eager to engage in meaningful dialogue to ensure that environmental protection remains a top priority for the state.
Sincerely,
Shannon Smith
Executive Director
FracTracker Alliance
Topics in This Article:
Join the Conversation
Stay Informed
FracTracker Newsletter
Support Our Work
FracTracker Alliance helps communicate the risks of oil and gas and petrochemical development to advance just energy alternatives that protect public health, natural resources, and the climate.
By contributing to FracTracker, you are helping to make tangible changes, such as decreasing the number of oil and gas wells in the US, protecting the public from toxic and radioactive chemicals, and stopping petrochemical expansion into vulnerable communities.
Your donations help fund the sourcing and analysis of new data so that we can keep you informed and continually update our resources.
Please donate to FracTracker today as a way to advocate for clean water, clean air, and healthy communities.
What You Should Read Next
Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Industry Trends: Drilled Wells, Violations, Production, and Waste
A Closer Look at Risks of the Appalachian Hydrogen Hub
Falcon Pipeline Criminal Charges Explained
The Importance of Surveying Rural Landowners in North Dakota on Fracking
Exploring the Fallout of Precision Scheduled Rail: A Rail Worker’s Perspective on Precision Scheduled Rail
Not-So-Radical Transparency: An Ineffective and Unnecessary Partnership Between Pennsylvania Governor Shapiro and the Gas Company CNX
California Must Improve Management of Idle Wells
Holes in FracFocus
Mapping PFAS Chemicals Used in Fracking Operations in West Virginia
Chevron’s $2.3 Billion Asset Adjustment Raises Questions Amidst Regulatory Changes in California
Data Gaps: A Critical Examination of Oil and Gas Well Incidents in Ohio
Stop Toxic Threat: A Heavy Industrial Zoning Battle
East Palestine Warning: The Growing Threat From Hazardous Waste Storage
Index of Oil and Gas Operator Health in California Shows Risks to State Economy and Taxpayers
Calling for Change: Life on the Fracking Frontlines
On the Wrong Track: Risks to Residents of the Upper Ohio River Valley From Railroad Incidents
Digital Atlas: Exploring Nature and Industry in the Raccoon Creek Watershed
Why Do Houses Keep Exploding in One Pennsylvania Suburb?
FracTracker Alliance Releases Statement Opposing Governor Shapiro’s Agreement With CNX
Oil and Gas Activity Within California Public Health Protection Zones
Assessment of Oil and Gas Well Ownership Transfers in California
Evaluation of the Capacity for Water Recycling for Colorado Oil and Gas Extraction Operations
Evidence Shows Oil and Gas Companies Use PFAS in New Mexico Wells
CalGEM Permit Review Q1 2023: Well Rework Permits Increase by 76% in California
2022 Pipeline Incidents Update: Is Pipeline Safety Achievable?
Testimony On EPA’s Proposed Methane Pollution Standards for the Oil and Gas Industry
Assessment of Rework Permits on Oil Production from Operational Wells Within the 3,200-Foot Public Health Protection Zone
CalGEM Permit Review Q4 2022: Oil Permit Approvals Show Steep Rise Within Protective Buffer Zones
A Contentious Landscape of Pipeline Build-outs in the Eastern US
Major Gas Leak Reveals Risks of Aging Gas Storage Wells in Pennsylvania
Coursing Through Gasland: A Digital Atlas Exploring Natural Gas Development in the Towanda Creek Watershed
Falcon Pipeline Online, Begins Operations Following Violations of Clean Streams Law
Synopsis: Risks to the Greater Columbus Water Supply from Oil and Gas Production
Desalination: The Chemical Industry’s Demand for Water in Texas
Take Action in Support of No New Leases
Carbon Capture and Storage: Developments in the Law of Pore Space in North Dakota
Carbon Capture and Storage: Industry Connections and Community Impacts
Carbon Capture and Storage: Fact or Fiction?
Pipeline Right-of-Ways: Making the Connection between Forest Fragmentation and the Spread of Lyme Disease in Southwestern Pennsylvania
FracTracker Finds Widespread Hydrocarbon Emissions from Active & Idle Oil and Gas Wells and Infrastructure in California
California Regulators Approve More Oil Well Permits Amid a Crisis of Leaking Oil Wells that Should be Plugged
An Insider Take on the Appalachian Hydrogen & CCUS Conference
Does Hydrogen Have a Role in our Energy Future?
Oil and Gas Brine in Ohio
PA Environment Digest Blog: Conventional Oil & Gas Drillers Dispose Of Drill Cuttings By ‘Dusting’
Real Talk on Pipelines
2021 Production from Pennsylvania’s Oil and Gas Wells
Mapping Energy Systems Impacted by the Russia-Ukraine War
Dimock residents working to protect water from a new threat: fracking waste
Implications of a 3,200-foot Setback in California
New Trends in Drilling Permit Approvals Take Shape in CA
Oil and Gas Drilling in California Legislative Districts
New Report: Fracking with “Forever Chemicals” in Colorado
Introducing: FracTracker’s comprehensive new Pennsylvania map!
New Letter from Federal Regulators Regarding how the Falcon has Been Investigated
US Army Corps Muskingum Watershed Plan ignores local concerns of oil and gas effects
Oil and gas companies use a lot of water to extract oil in drought-stricken California
Southeastern Texas Petrochemical Industry Needs 318 Billion Gallons of Water, but the US EPA Says Not So Fast
Chickahominy Pipeline project tries to exploit an apparent regulatory loophole
Map Update on Criminal Charges Facing Mariner East 2 Pipeline
It’s Time to Stop Urban Oil Drilling in Los Angeles
Infrastructure Networks in Texas
California Prisons are Within 2,500’ of Oil and Gas Extraction
New power plant proposal called senseless and wasteful by climate groups
Ongoing Safety Concerns over Shell’s Falcon Pipeline
New Neighborhood Drilling Permits Issued While California Fails to Act on Public Health Rules
The world is watching as bitcoin battle brews in the US
California Oil & Gas Drilling Permits Drop in Response to Decreased Permit Applications to CalGEM
California Denies Well Stimulation Permits
Mapping PFAS “Forever Chemicals” in Oil & Gas Operations
Updated National Energy and Petrochemical Map
Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania Fracking Story Map
Ohio & Fracking Waste: The Case for Better Waste Management
Pennsylvania Conventional Well Map Update
Impacts of 2020 Colonial Pipeline Rupture Continue to Grow
Gas Storage Plan vs. Indigenous Rights in Nova Scotia
Mapping Gathering Lines in Bradford County, Pennsylvania
Trends in fracking waste coming to New York State from Pennsylvania
2021 Pipeline Incidents Update: Safety Record Not Improving
New York State Oil & Gas Well Drilling: Patterns Over Time
Risky Byhalia Connection Pipeline Threatens Tennessee & Mississippi Health, Water Supply
Shell’s Falcon Pipeline Under Investigation for Serious Public Safety Threats
Kern County’s Drafted EIR Will Increase the Burden for Frontline Communities
Pennsylvania’s Waste Disposal Wells – A Tale of Two Datasets
California Oil & Gas Setbacks Recommendations Memo
Oil and Gas Wells on California State Lands
Industrial Impacts in Michigan: A Photo Essay & Story Map
People and Production: Reducing Risk in California Extraction
Documenting emissions from new oil and gas wells in California
FracTracker in the Field: Building a Live Virtual Map
Mapping Gathering Lines in Ohio and West Virginia
The North Dakota Shale Viewer Reimagined: Mapping the Water and Waste Impact
Falcon Pipeline Construction Releases over 250,000 Gallons of Drilling Fluid in Pennsylvania and Ohio
Systematic Racism in Kern County Oil and Gas Permitting Ordinance
Fracking Water Use in Pennsylvania Increases Dramatically
New Yorkers mount resistance against North Brooklyn Pipeline
California, Back in Frack
California Setback Analyses Summary
Air Pollution from Pennsylvania Shale Gas Compressor Stations – REPORT
New York State Oil & Gas Wells – 2020 Update
National Energy and Petrochemical Map
Governor Newsom Must Do More to Address the Cause of Oil Spill Surface Expressions
Oil & Gas Well Permits Issued By Newsom Administration Rival Those Issued Under Gov. Jerry Brown
Pipelines Continue to Catch Fire and Explode
The Hidden Inefficiencies and Environmental Costs of Fracking in Ohio
Fracking in Pennsylvania: Not Worth It
Fracking Threatens Ohio’s Captina Creek Watershed
How State Regulations Hold Us back and What Other Countries are doing about Fracking
New Method for Locating Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells is Tested in New York State
Abandoned Wells in Pennsylvania: We’re Not Doing Enough
The Underlying Politics and Unconventional Well Fundamentals of an Appalachian Storage Hub
Permitting New Oil and Gas Wells Under the Newsom Administration
Mapping the Petrochemical Build-Out Along the Ohio River
Impact of a 2,500′ Oil and Gas Well Setback in California
Production and Location Trends in PA: A Moving Target
The Falcon Public Monitoring Project
Release: The 2019 You Are Here map launches, showing New York’s hurdles to climate leadership
Idle Wells are a Major Risk
Literally Millions of Failing, Abandoned Wells
Wicked Witch of the Waste
The Growing Web of Oil and Gas Pipelines
Unnatural Disasters
Getting Rid of All of that Waste – Increasing Use of Oil and Gas Injection Wells in Pennsylvania
A Disturbing Tale of Diminishing Returns in Ohio
Pennsylvania Drilling Trends in 2018
216 Franklin St, Suite 400, Johnstown, PA 15901
Phone: +1 (717) 303-0403 | info@fractracker.org
FracTracker Alliance is a 501(c)3 non-profit: Tax identification number: 80-0844297
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!