Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, can result in long-term environmental contamination and human exposure risks.
Key Findings
Between 2013 and 2023, five companies injected PFAS into a total of 43 horizontal gas wells in eight counties in West Virginia.
Nearly 2,000 more wells in the state have been injected with unidentified chemicals that are not disclosed to the public.
There is an urgent need for increased public awareness about where PFAS are being used and the risks associated with exposure.
Wells Fracked With “Forever Chemicals” in West Virginia
A report released in March 2024 by Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR), with mapping by FracTracker Alliance, reveals that oil and gas companies have used a highly persistent and toxic class of chemicals known as PFAS for hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” in West Virginia.
According to the report, data publicly disclosed by the oil and gas industry shows that, between 2013 and 2023, five companies injected PFAS into a total of 43 horizontal gas wells in eight counties in West Virginia. The report also indicates that nearly 2,000 more wells in the state have been injected with unidentified chemicals that are not disclosed to the public because they are classified as “trade secrets” under state law, some of which could be PFAS chemicals.
Commonly referred to as “forever chemicals,” per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, can result in long-term environmental contamination and human exposure risks, including cancer, immune system dysfunction, and developmental problems. Due to their toxicity, there is an urgent need for increased public awareness about where PFAS are being used and the risks associated with exposure to this class of hazardous chemicals.
Wells in West Virginia Fracked with PTFE/Teflon or Trade Secret Chemicals
This interactive map looks at oil and gas wells in West Virginia that are known to have used PTFE/Teflon or trade secret chemicals.
View the map “Details” tab below in the top right corner to learn more and access the data, or click on the map to explore the dynamic version of this data. Data sources are also listed at the end of this article. In order to turn layers on and off in the map, use the Layers dropdown menu. This tool is only available in Full Screen view. Items will activate in this map dependent on the level of zoom in or out.
View Full Size Map | Updated 3/29/2024 | Map Tutorial
Uncovering Unknown Chemicals
To visualize the data, Matt Kelso of FracTracker Alliance mapped the locations where PFAS and trade secret chemicals have been used to frack wells in West Virginia based on data analyzed by Gary Allison, the developer behind Open-FF, an open source project sponsored by FracTracker that makes industry chemical disclosure data from FracFocus accessible to the public.
According to Kelso, FracTracker’s manager of data of technology, mapping the wells injected with PFAS or trade secret chemicals is critical to showing the proximity of these wells to where people live, work, and recreate.
“It’s one thing to hear about some number of wells in Wetzel County or Doddridge County,” Kelso said. “Seeing them on a map gives a sense of the extent of the phenomenon, and also implicitly reminds viewers that there are people, schools, churches—all of the things that people care about—in these same communities.”
The interactive map shows the oil and gas wells in West Virginia that were fracked between 2012 and 2022 with the PFAS chemical polytetrafluoroethylene, also known as PTFE or Teflon, or at least one trade secret chemical or trade secret surfactant that are possibly PFAS. However, the extensive use of trade secret designations in West Virginia may obscure the extent to which companies use PFAS and other toxic chemicals in oil and gas extraction.
Gary Allison, the developer behind Open-FF who analyzed data for the report, says it’s a major cause for concern that the full extent of the problem isn’t known, which is primarily due to oil and gas companies and chemical manufacturers using the trade secret designation to avoid disclosing the specific identities of the chemicals used in fracking to the public.
“One of the most interesting and frustrating things is how, even though we have this data set (FracFocus) with over six million chemical records for over 200,000 fracking jobs, the degree of PFAS use is still unknown,” said Allison, the founder of Open-FF who analyzed data for the report based on oil and gas industry disclosures on FracFocus, the national hydraulic fracturing chemical registry managed by the Ground Water Protection Council (GWPC) and the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC).
Wells in West Virginia
Data analyzed using Open-FF uncovered nearly 2,000 wells were fracked with trade secrets chemicals in West Virginia.
Wells in West Virginia
Data analyzed using Open-FF uncovered nearly 2,000 wells were fracked with trade secrets chemicals in West Virginia.
The Impact of PFAS Chemicals
While West Virginia has a long history with PFAS chemicals, the report highlights that the use of PFAS and secret chemicals in fracking isn’t limited to West Virginia. Previous reports compiled by Physicians for Social Responsibility with mapping by FracTracker confirm PFAS have been used for fracking in other states, including Colorado, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Mexico and Texas, indicating it could be an industry-wide issue with far-reaching consequences for communities and the environment.
Though the risks of PFAS have been known for decades, the full extent of their impact on human health and the environment has become increasingly evident in recent years. In 2022, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated “two of the most widely used PFAS as hazardous substances” under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), also known as Superfund, which authorizes the President to respond to releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances into the environment.
“It’s important to keep talking about these chemicals. Since they may affect private water supplies for generations to come, and therefore, they may affect the health of people who rely on those water sources,” Kelso said. “While the class of PFAS chemicals is very broad, I think it is also—as a group—just one of many aspects of drilling and waste that are inherently dangerous and worth highlighting.”
References & Where to Learn More
- Download “Fracking With ‘Forever Chemicals’ in West Virginia” by Physicians for Social Responsibility
- Previous reports on the use of PFAS by the oil and gas industry:
- Explore Open-FF to learn more about chemical disclosure data
Topics in This Article:
Join the Conversation
Stay Informed
FracTracker Newsletter
Support Our Work
FracTracker Alliance helps communicate the risks of oil and gas and petrochemical development to advance just energy alternatives that protect public health, natural resources, and the climate.
By contributing to FracTracker, you are helping to make tangible changes, such as decreasing the number of oil and gas wells in the US, protecting the public from toxic and radioactive chemicals, and stopping petrochemical expansion into vulnerable communities.
Your donations help fund the sourcing and analysis of new data so that we can keep you informed and continually update our resources.
Please donate to FracTracker today as a way to advocate for clean water, clean air, and healthy communities.
What You Should Read Next
Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Industry Trends: Drilled Wells, Violations, Production, and Waste
A Closer Look at Risks of the Appalachian Hydrogen Hub
Falcon Pipeline Criminal Charges Explained
The Importance of Surveying Rural Landowners in North Dakota on Fracking
Exploring the Fallout of Precision Scheduled Rail: A Rail Worker’s Perspective on Precision Scheduled Rail
Not-So-Radical Transparency: An Ineffective and Unnecessary Partnership Between Pennsylvania Governor Shapiro and the Gas Company CNX
California Must Improve Management of Idle Wells
Holes in FracFocus
Mapping PFAS Chemicals Used in Fracking Operations in West Virginia
Chevron’s $2.3 Billion Asset Adjustment Raises Questions Amidst Regulatory Changes in California
Data Gaps: A Critical Examination of Oil and Gas Well Incidents in Ohio
Stop Toxic Threat: A Heavy Industrial Zoning Battle
East Palestine Warning: The Growing Threat From Hazardous Waste Storage
Index of Oil and Gas Operator Health in California Shows Risks to State Economy and Taxpayers
Calling for Change: Life on the Fracking Frontlines
On the Wrong Track: Risks to Residents of the Upper Ohio River Valley From Railroad Incidents
Digital Atlas: Exploring Nature and Industry in the Raccoon Creek Watershed
Why Do Houses Keep Exploding in One Pennsylvania Suburb?
FracTracker Alliance Releases Statement Opposing Governor Shapiro’s Agreement With CNX
Oil and Gas Activity Within California Public Health Protection Zones
Assessment of Oil and Gas Well Ownership Transfers in California
Evaluation of the Capacity for Water Recycling for Colorado Oil and Gas Extraction Operations
Evidence Shows Oil and Gas Companies Use PFAS in New Mexico Wells
CalGEM Permit Review Q1 2023: Well Rework Permits Increase by 76% in California
2022 Pipeline Incidents Update: Is Pipeline Safety Achievable?
Testimony On EPA’s Proposed Methane Pollution Standards for the Oil and Gas Industry
Assessment of Rework Permits on Oil Production from Operational Wells Within the 3,200-Foot Public Health Protection Zone
CalGEM Permit Review Q4 2022: Oil Permit Approvals Show Steep Rise Within Protective Buffer Zones
A Contentious Landscape of Pipeline Build-outs in the Eastern US
Major Gas Leak Reveals Risks of Aging Gas Storage Wells in Pennsylvania
Coursing Through Gasland: A Digital Atlas Exploring Natural Gas Development in the Towanda Creek Watershed
Falcon Pipeline Online, Begins Operations Following Violations of Clean Streams Law
Synopsis: Risks to the Greater Columbus Water Supply from Oil and Gas Production
Desalination: The Chemical Industry’s Demand for Water in Texas
Take Action in Support of No New Leases
Carbon Capture and Storage: Developments in the Law of Pore Space in North Dakota
Carbon Capture and Storage: Industry Connections and Community Impacts
Carbon Capture and Storage: Fact or Fiction?
Pipeline Right-of-Ways: Making the Connection between Forest Fragmentation and the Spread of Lyme Disease in Southwestern Pennsylvania
FracTracker Finds Widespread Hydrocarbon Emissions from Active & Idle Oil and Gas Wells and Infrastructure in California
California Regulators Approve More Oil Well Permits Amid a Crisis of Leaking Oil Wells that Should be Plugged
An Insider Take on the Appalachian Hydrogen & CCUS Conference
Does Hydrogen Have a Role in our Energy Future?
Oil and Gas Brine in Ohio
PA Environment Digest Blog: Conventional Oil & Gas Drillers Dispose Of Drill Cuttings By ‘Dusting’
Real Talk on Pipelines
2021 Production from Pennsylvania’s Oil and Gas Wells
Mapping Energy Systems Impacted by the Russia-Ukraine War
Dimock residents working to protect water from a new threat: fracking waste
Implications of a 3,200-foot Setback in California
New Trends in Drilling Permit Approvals Take Shape in CA
Oil and Gas Drilling in California Legislative Districts
New Report: Fracking with “Forever Chemicals” in Colorado
Introducing: FracTracker’s comprehensive new Pennsylvania map!
New Letter from Federal Regulators Regarding how the Falcon has Been Investigated
US Army Corps Muskingum Watershed Plan ignores local concerns of oil and gas effects
Oil and gas companies use a lot of water to extract oil in drought-stricken California
Southeastern Texas Petrochemical Industry Needs 318 Billion Gallons of Water, but the US EPA Says Not So Fast
Chickahominy Pipeline project tries to exploit an apparent regulatory loophole
Map Update on Criminal Charges Facing Mariner East 2 Pipeline
It’s Time to Stop Urban Oil Drilling in Los Angeles
Infrastructure Networks in Texas
California Prisons are Within 2,500’ of Oil and Gas Extraction
New power plant proposal called senseless and wasteful by climate groups
Ongoing Safety Concerns over Shell’s Falcon Pipeline
New Neighborhood Drilling Permits Issued While California Fails to Act on Public Health Rules
The world is watching as bitcoin battle brews in the US
California Oil & Gas Drilling Permits Drop in Response to Decreased Permit Applications to CalGEM
California Denies Well Stimulation Permits
Mapping PFAS “Forever Chemicals” in Oil & Gas Operations
Updated National Energy and Petrochemical Map
Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania Fracking Story Map
Ohio & Fracking Waste: The Case for Better Waste Management
Pennsylvania Conventional Well Map Update
Impacts of 2020 Colonial Pipeline Rupture Continue to Grow
Gas Storage Plan vs. Indigenous Rights in Nova Scotia
Mapping Gathering Lines in Bradford County, Pennsylvania
Trends in fracking waste coming to New York State from Pennsylvania
2021 Pipeline Incidents Update: Safety Record Not Improving
New York State Oil & Gas Well Drilling: Patterns Over Time
Risky Byhalia Connection Pipeline Threatens Tennessee & Mississippi Health, Water Supply
Shell’s Falcon Pipeline Under Investigation for Serious Public Safety Threats
Kern County’s Drafted EIR Will Increase the Burden for Frontline Communities
Pennsylvania’s Waste Disposal Wells – A Tale of Two Datasets
California Oil & Gas Setbacks Recommendations Memo
Oil and Gas Wells on California State Lands
Industrial Impacts in Michigan: A Photo Essay & Story Map
People and Production: Reducing Risk in California Extraction
Documenting emissions from new oil and gas wells in California
FracTracker in the Field: Building a Live Virtual Map
Mapping Gathering Lines in Ohio and West Virginia
The North Dakota Shale Viewer Reimagined: Mapping the Water and Waste Impact
Falcon Pipeline Construction Releases over 250,000 Gallons of Drilling Fluid in Pennsylvania and Ohio
Systematic Racism in Kern County Oil and Gas Permitting Ordinance
Fracking Water Use in Pennsylvania Increases Dramatically
New Yorkers mount resistance against North Brooklyn Pipeline
California, Back in Frack
California Setback Analyses Summary
Air Pollution from Pennsylvania Shale Gas Compressor Stations – REPORT
New York State Oil & Gas Wells – 2020 Update
National Energy and Petrochemical Map
Governor Newsom Must Do More to Address the Cause of Oil Spill Surface Expressions
Oil & Gas Well Permits Issued By Newsom Administration Rival Those Issued Under Gov. Jerry Brown
Pipelines Continue to Catch Fire and Explode
The Hidden Inefficiencies and Environmental Costs of Fracking in Ohio
Fracking in Pennsylvania: Not Worth It
Fracking Threatens Ohio’s Captina Creek Watershed
How State Regulations Hold Us back and What Other Countries are doing about Fracking
New Method for Locating Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells is Tested in New York State
Abandoned Wells in Pennsylvania: We’re Not Doing Enough
The Underlying Politics and Unconventional Well Fundamentals of an Appalachian Storage Hub
Permitting New Oil and Gas Wells Under the Newsom Administration
Mapping the Petrochemical Build-Out Along the Ohio River
Impact of a 2,500′ Oil and Gas Well Setback in California
Production and Location Trends in PA: A Moving Target
The Falcon Public Monitoring Project
Release: The 2019 You Are Here map launches, showing New York’s hurdles to climate leadership
Idle Wells are a Major Risk
Literally Millions of Failing, Abandoned Wells
Wicked Witch of the Waste
The Growing Web of Oil and Gas Pipelines
Unnatural Disasters
Getting Rid of All of that Waste – Increasing Use of Oil and Gas Injection Wells in Pennsylvania
A Disturbing Tale of Diminishing Returns in Ohio
Pennsylvania Drilling Trends in 2018
216 Franklin St, Suite 400, Johnstown, PA 15901
Phone: +1 (717) 303-0403 | info@fractracker.org
FracTracker Alliance is a 501(c)3 non-profit: Tax identification number: 80-0844297
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!