
Major Gas Leak Reveals Risks of Aging Gas Storage Wells in Pennsylvania
Share this entry
Overview
Following an enormous gas leak in Jackson Township, Cambria County, Pennsylvania, we mapped oil and gas storage wells and fields throughout the state and found that the majority of Pennsylvania’s storage wells were drilled prior to 1979, making them most vulnerable to well failures.
A well in Cambria County, Pennsylvania has released an estimated 1.4 billion cubic feet (bcf) of methane after two weeks of uncontrolled emissions. On November 20, 2022, after leaking for over two weeks, the well’s operator, Equitrans Midstream, was finally able to plug the well.
Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas that warms the Earth’s atmosphere quicker than carbon dioxide. The Rager Mountain gas leak is equivalent to emissions from burning over 7,200 tanker trucks of gasoline. In addition to being a climate disaster, uncontrolled methane emissions can cause fires, explosions, and fatalities.
The George L Reade 1 well is one of several active storage wells in the Rager Mountain Gas Storage Facility, an underground depleted gas field (Figure 1). Residents miles from the site reported that the noise from the well was as loud as a jet plane taking off, and that the air was thick with a sulfur-smell.
Figure 1. A map of George L Reade 1 well, which leaked over a billion cubic feet of methane into the atmosphere. The well is in the Rager Mountain Gas Storage Facility in Jackson Township, Cambria County. A recent PA DEP inspection report stated that the gas was escaping from the annulus of the well, which is the space between the inner and outer casing.
Old and Repurposed Storage Wells
The 1.4 bcf-leak at the Rager Mountain facility leak will go in Pennsylvania’s record books. It’s being compared to the largest methane leak in U.S. history, which was from a 2016 failure at a natural gas storage well in the Aliso Canyon natural gas storage field. That incident released 4.6 billion cubic feet of methane, forcing thousands to evacuate and causing an array of health impacts for the surrounding community.
In the case of both leaks, the failed wells were old: the George L Reade 1 well was drilled in 1965, and the Aliso Canyon well was drilled in 1954. These older wells were constructed during a time with fewer regulations and more primitive technology, and are more vulnerable to natural degradation forces like corrosion and cement breakdown.
Older storage wells are also more likely to be former conventional oil or gas production wells that were repurposed for storage. That’s the case with the George L Reade 1 well and the Aliso Canyon well. These repurposed wells are not designed for two-way flow, and are more likely to have a single point of failure in their design.
A 2017 study published in Environmental Research Letters by Drew R Michanowicz et al revealed the widespread risk of aging storage wells across the country, and highlighted Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, and New York as the states facing the most risk.
Michanowicz et al found 370 repurposed wells in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania also has the most storage fields of any state, while Ohio has the most active storage wells. The map below (Figure 2) from the study illustrates those repurposed wells.
Figure 2. From Michanowicz et al 2017 Environ. Res. Lett. 12 064004 “Counts of repurposed wells per facility symbolized by orange markers. Of the 2715 repurposed wells shown, 2694 (99%) were constructed prior to 1979, indicating a particular likelihood to exhibit SPF [single point of failure] designs. Percent of active UGS wells missing sufficient date information is indicated at the state level by green shading. Gray markers indicate active facilities that contain at least one repurposed ‘unknown’ status well. Callout numbers represent counts of repurposed wells by state and includes active and unknown status well counts where applicable”
Mapping Gas Storage Wells in Pennsylvania
The vast majority of gas produced in Pennsylvania is extracted by fracking. After the gas is brought to Earth’s surface, a portion of it is injected back underground in rock formations for storage. The Pennsylvania DEP reports 48 active oil and gas fields in Pennsylvania, ranging from 2,000 to 8,000 feet deep, and data from the US Energy Information Administration, mapped below, shows 49.
The well that leaked was part of the Rager Mountain Storage Facility, a depleted gas field in the Oriskany Sandstone formation. Nearly all of the storage fields in Pennsylvania are depleted gas fields, although salt domes and aquifers are also used for storage in other states.
Data from the PA DEP reveals that there are 1,892 storage wells in the state, and 77% of them are listed as active.
Figure 3. Status of Pennsylvania’s oil and gas storage wells, as of November 2022. Data Source: PA DEP, via PASDA
Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Storage Wells and Field
This interactive map looks at the locations of gas fields, as well as gas storage wells. The George L Reade 1 well is starred on the map as well.
View the map “Details” tab below in the top right corner to learn more and access the data, or click on the map to explore the dynamic version of this data. Data sources are also listed at the end of this article.
In order to turn layers on and off in the map, use the Layers drop-down menu. This tool is only available in Full Screen view.
Items will activate in this map dependent on the level of zoom in or out.
View Full Size Map | Updated 11/21/2022 | Map Tutorial
The Pennsylvania county with the highest number of storage wells is Potter, followed by Westmoreland, Greene, Washington, then McKean.
As mentioned before, the age of a well, determined by the date a well is drilled (called spud date) plays a factor in the well’s integrity. This dataset is missing spud dates for many of its wells: 1,088 of the wells have spud dates 01/01/1800, which is “a system generated date to identify those wells that, based upon DEP’s records, appear to have been drilled, but for which DEP does not have a spud date on file,” and another 39 wells do not have any spud date listed. That leaves 764 storage wells with spud dates. Of those, their median age is 64 years. The graph below (Figure 4) shows the number of wells drilled per year.
Figure 4. Graph of storage wells drilled per year in Pennsylvania, as of November 2022. Of the 1,891 wells in the state’s inventory, this graph only includes 764, and omits wells that do not have spud dates (dates indicating when the wells were drilled).
According to Michanowicz et al, repurposed wells drilled before 1979 are more likely to exhibit dangerous deficiencies, including single-point-of-failure designs. Of the 764 wells with a spud date, 588 (77%) were drilled before 1979 (given that we don’t have an accurate age for 60% of the wells, the number is likely much higher). Wells that were drilled before 1917 (of which there were 15), present an even higher risk, as that year marks the advent of cement zonal isolation techniques. While some of those wells may not be repurposed, it’s safe to say Pennsylvania’s aging storage well inventory poses major risks.
The oil and gas industry is the largest industrial source of methane in the country. Not only does methane warm our atmosphere, the leak at the Rager Mountain Storage Facility reveals startling facts about how reliant our country’s oil and gas system is on aging and obsolete infrastructure. This comes at a major risk to communities and the climate.
Two weeks ago, on November 11th at at COP27 in Sharm el Sheikh, Egypt, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced stronger standards to cut methane pollution from the oil and gas industry. The EPA will take comments on this proposal until February 13, 2023, and will hold a virtual public hearing January 10 and 11, 2023. This is a crucial opportunity to fight for the strongest possible regulations to stop these dangerous emissions.
The Take Away
Following an enormous gas leak in Jackson Township, Cambria County, Pennsylvania, we mapped oil and gas storage wells and fields throughout the state and found that the majority of Pennsylvania’s storage wells were drilled prior to 1979, making them most vulnerable to well failures.
The oil and gas industry is the largest industrial source of methane in the country. Not only does methane warm our atmosphere, the leak at the Rager Mountain Storage Facility reveals startling facts about how reliant our country’s oil and gas system is on aging and obsolete infrastructure. This comes at a major risk to communities and the climate.
References & Where to Learn More
- Data used in this article: Oil Gas Locations – Conventional Unconventional – 2022 – Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, via PASDA
- Drew R Michanowicz et al 2017 Environ. Res. Lett. 12 064004
- A Climate Disaster – California in a State of Emergency As a Result of a Massive Natural Gas Leak
- Risks from Colorado’s Natural Gas Storage and Transmission Systems
Topics in This Article:
Join the Conversation
Stay Informed
FracTracker Newsletter
Support Our Work
FracTracker Alliance helps communicate the risks of oil and gas and petrochemical development to advance just energy alternatives that protect public health, natural resources, and the climate.
By contributing to FracTracker, you are helping to make tangible changes, such as decreasing the number of oil and gas wells in the US, protecting the public from toxic and radioactive chemicals, and stopping petrochemical expansion into vulnerable communities.
Your donations help fund the sourcing and analysis of new data so that we can keep you informed and continually update our resources.
Please donate to FracTracker today as a way to advocate for clean water, clean air, and healthy communities.
What You Should Read Next


Can California Energy Policy Move Past its Contradictions?

Data Gaps: A Critical Examination of Oil and Gas Well Incidents in Ohio

Indigenous Communities’ Fight Against CO2 Pipelines in the Great Plains

Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Industry Trends: Drilled Wells, Violations, Production, and Waste

A Closer Look at Risks of the Appalachian Hydrogen Hub

Falcon Pipeline Criminal Charges Explained

The Importance of Surveying Rural Landowners in North Dakota on Fracking

Exploring the Fallout of Precision Scheduled Rail: A Rail Worker’s Perspective on Precision Scheduled Rail

Not-So-Radical Transparency: An Ineffective and Unnecessary Partnership Between Pennsylvania Governor Shapiro and the Gas Company CNX

California Must Improve Management of Idle Wells

Holes in FracFocus

Mapping PFAS Chemicals Used in Fracking Operations in West Virginia

Chevron’s $2.3 Billion Asset Adjustment Raises Questions Amidst Regulatory Changes in California

Stop Toxic Threat: A Heavy Industrial Zoning Battle

East Palestine Warning: The Growing Threat From Hazardous Waste Storage

Index of Oil and Gas Operator Health in California Shows Risks to State Economy and Taxpayers

Calling for Change: Life on the Fracking Frontlines

On the Wrong Track: Risks to Residents of the Upper Ohio River Valley From Railroad Incidents

Digital Atlas: Exploring Nature and Industry in the Raccoon Creek Watershed

Why Do Houses Keep Exploding in One Pennsylvania Suburb?

FracTracker Alliance Releases Statement Opposing Governor Shapiro’s Agreement With CNX

Oil and Gas Activity Within California Public Health Protection Zones

Assessment of Oil and Gas Well Ownership Transfers in California

Evaluation of the Capacity for Water Recycling for Colorado Oil and Gas Extraction Operations

Evidence Shows Oil and Gas Companies Use PFAS in New Mexico Wells

CalGEM Permit Review Q1 2023: Well Rework Permits Increase by 76% in California

2022 Pipeline Incidents Update: Is Pipeline Safety Achievable?

Testimony On EPA’s Proposed Methane Pollution Standards for the Oil and Gas Industry

Assessment of Rework Permits on Oil Production from Operational Wells Within the 3,200-Foot Public Health Protection Zone

CalGEM Permit Review Q4 2022: Oil Permit Approvals Show Steep Rise Within Protective Buffer Zones

A Contentious Landscape of Pipeline Build-outs in the Eastern US

Major Gas Leak Reveals Risks of Aging Gas Storage Wells in Pennsylvania

Coursing Through Gasland: A Digital Atlas Exploring Natural Gas Development in the Towanda Creek Watershed

Falcon Pipeline Online, Begins Operations Following Violations of Clean Streams Law

Synopsis: Risks to the Greater Columbus Water Supply from Oil and Gas Production

Desalination: The Chemical Industry’s Demand for Water in Texas

Take Action in Support of No New Leases

Carbon Capture and Storage: Developments in the Law of Pore Space in North Dakota

Carbon Capture and Storage: Industry Connections and Community Impacts

Carbon Capture and Storage: Fact or Fiction?

Pipeline Right-of-Ways: Making the Connection between Forest Fragmentation and the Spread of Lyme Disease in Southwestern Pennsylvania

FracTracker Finds Widespread Hydrocarbon Emissions from Active & Idle Oil and Gas Wells and Infrastructure in California

California Regulators Approve More Oil Well Permits Amid a Crisis of Leaking Oil Wells that Should be Plugged

An Insider Take on the Appalachian Hydrogen & CCUS Conference

Does Hydrogen Have a Role in our Energy Future?

Oil and Gas Brine in Ohio

PA Environment Digest Blog: Conventional Oil & Gas Drillers Dispose Of Drill Cuttings By ‘Dusting’

Real Talk on Pipelines

2021 Production from Pennsylvania’s Oil and Gas Wells

Mapping Energy Systems Impacted by the Russia-Ukraine War

Dimock residents working to protect water from a new threat: fracking waste

Implications of a 3,200-foot Setback in California

New Trends in Drilling Permit Approvals Take Shape in CA

Oil and Gas Drilling in California Legislative Districts

New Report: Fracking with “Forever Chemicals” in Colorado

Introducing: FracTracker’s comprehensive new Pennsylvania map!

New Letter from Federal Regulators Regarding how the Falcon has Been Investigated

US Army Corps Muskingum Watershed Plan ignores local concerns of oil and gas effects

Oil and gas companies use a lot of water to extract oil in drought-stricken California

Southeastern Texas Petrochemical Industry Needs 318 Billion Gallons of Water, but the US EPA Says Not So Fast

Chickahominy Pipeline project tries to exploit an apparent regulatory loophole

Map Update on Criminal Charges Facing Mariner East 2 Pipeline

It’s Time to Stop Urban Oil Drilling in Los Angeles

Infrastructure Networks in Texas

California Prisons are Within 2,500’ of Oil and Gas Extraction

New power plant proposal called senseless and wasteful by climate groups

Ongoing Safety Concerns over Shell’s Falcon Pipeline

New Neighborhood Drilling Permits Issued While California Fails to Act on Public Health Rules

The world is watching as bitcoin battle brews in the US


California Oil & Gas Drilling Permits Drop in Response to Decreased Permit Applications to CalGEM

California Denies Well Stimulation Permits

Mapping PFAS “Forever Chemicals” in Oil & Gas Operations

Updated National Energy and Petrochemical Map

Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania Fracking Story Map

Ohio & Fracking Waste: The Case for Better Waste Management

Pennsylvania Conventional Well Map Update

Impacts of 2020 Colonial Pipeline Rupture Continue to Grow

Gas Storage Plan vs. Indigenous Rights in Nova Scotia

Mapping Gathering Lines in Bradford County, Pennsylvania

Trends in fracking waste coming to New York State from Pennsylvania

2021 Pipeline Incidents Update: Safety Record Not Improving

New York State Oil & Gas Well Drilling: Patterns Over Time

Risky Byhalia Connection Pipeline Threatens Tennessee & Mississippi Health, Water Supply

Shell’s Falcon Pipeline Under Investigation for Serious Public Safety Threats

Kern County’s Drafted EIR Will Increase the Burden for Frontline Communities

Pennsylvania’s Waste Disposal Wells – A Tale of Two Datasets

California Oil & Gas Setbacks Recommendations Memo

Oil and Gas Wells on California State Lands

Industrial Impacts in Michigan: A Photo Essay & Story Map

People and Production: Reducing Risk in California Extraction

Documenting emissions from new oil and gas wells in California


FracTracker in the Field: Building a Live Virtual Map


Mapping Gathering Lines in Ohio and West Virginia

The North Dakota Shale Viewer Reimagined: Mapping the Water and Waste Impact

Falcon Pipeline Construction Releases over 250,000 Gallons of Drilling Fluid in Pennsylvania and Ohio

Systematic Racism in Kern County Oil and Gas Permitting Ordinance

Fracking Water Use in Pennsylvania Increases Dramatically

New Yorkers mount resistance against North Brooklyn Pipeline

California, Back in Frack

California Setback Analyses Summary

Air Pollution from Pennsylvania Shale Gas Compressor Stations – REPORT

New York State Oil & Gas Wells – 2020 Update

National Energy and Petrochemical Map

Governor Newsom Must Do More to Address the Cause of Oil Spill Surface Expressions

Oil & Gas Well Permits Issued By Newsom Administration Rival Those Issued Under Gov. Jerry Brown

Pipelines Continue to Catch Fire and Explode

The Hidden Inefficiencies and Environmental Costs of Fracking in Ohio

Fracking in Pennsylvania: Not Worth It

Fracking Threatens Ohio’s Captina Creek Watershed


How State Regulations Hold Us back and What Other Countries are doing about Fracking

New Method for Locating Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells is Tested in New York State


Abandoned Wells in Pennsylvania: We’re Not Doing Enough


The Underlying Politics and Unconventional Well Fundamentals of an Appalachian Storage Hub

Permitting New Oil and Gas Wells Under the Newsom Administration

Mapping the Petrochemical Build-Out Along the Ohio River

Impact of a 2,500′ Oil and Gas Well Setback in California

Production and Location Trends in PA: A Moving Target

The Falcon Public Monitoring Project

Release: The 2019 You Are Here map launches, showing New York’s hurdles to climate leadership

Idle Wells are a Major Risk

Literally Millions of Failing, Abandoned Wells

Wicked Witch of the Waste

The Growing Web of Oil and Gas Pipelines

Unnatural Disasters

Getting Rid of All of that Waste – Increasing Use of Oil and Gas Injection Wells in Pennsylvania

A Disturbing Tale of Diminishing Returns in Ohio

Pennsylvania Drilling Trends in 2018
216 Franklin St, Suite 400, Johnstown, PA 15901
Phone: +1 (717) 303-0403 | info@fractracker.org
FracTracker Alliance is a 501(c)3 non-profit: Tax identification number: 80-0844297