Producing nitrogen fertilizer for US cropland depends on cheap and unfettered access to natural gas.
Key Findings
Ammonia produced for fertilizer using the Haber-Bosch process is responsible for approximately 1.8% of carbon dioxide global emissions.
Overview
Products derived from oil and gas are ubiquitous in our lives—and so are their impacts. As society becomes increasingly aware of the risks associated with petrochemicals, one common concern centers around the production and disposal of single-use plastic products. However, there are many other issues related to the petrochemical industry. A prime example: the connection between agriculture and petrochemicals.
But how interdependent are industrial-scale agriculture and the oil and gas industry? And what are the concerns? In this article, we explore the linkages between the two industries, including the history of agricultural development in America and its connection to industrial chemical manufacturing.
Fertilizer and Fossil Fuels
There are many examples of connections between large-scale commercial agriculture and the oil, gas, and petrochemical industries. One example of this is commodities such as corn and soybeans being coated in plastics to allow for the controlled release of fungicides and insecticides. However, the most time-tested example of how reliant these two behemoths are connected: industrial agriculture’s historic reliance on nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers.
As farming practices have eroded topsoil and depleted once-fertile grasslands of the greater Midwest, often referred to as the “breadbasket” for its role in producing high volumes of wheat and other staple food crops, reliance on fertilizer has only continued to grow in the last hundred years—which in turns drives the fossil fuel industry.
The History of Fertilizer Production
The connection between fossil fuels and fertilizer begins with production. Producing nitrogen fertilizer for US cropland depends on cheap and unfettered access to natural gas to fuel the Haber-Bosch process, an industrial chemical manufacturing process developed to synthesize ammonia.
Discovered by Nobel Prize-winning chemists Fritz Haber and Carl Bosch in the early 1900s, this process converts N2 into Ammonia (NH3) by reacting it with hydrogen (H) at extremely high temperatures (>900F) and pressures (2,200-2,900 psi). Producing the hydrogen feedstock needed for the Haber-Bosch process requires using natural gas for steam reformation to produce hydrogen and carbon monoxide.
By middle of the twentieth century, aided and abetted by the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations’ scientists like Norman Borlaug, technological advances in nitrogen production helped spur what came to be known as the “Green Revolution”, the precursor to modern industrial agriculture characterized by massive alterations of plant genetics, modern irrigation, rampant deployment of all manner of herbicides and pesticides, and the full-throated advocacy for the utility of synthetic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers.
Though the Green Revolution is credited for having increased yields significantly where it was implemented, even earning its architect Norman Borlaug a Nobel Prize in 1970, many others were sounding alarms about the potential ecological and socioeconomic impacts of such intensive agriculture, including Anne and Paul Ehrlich in their classic book Population Bomb (1968), and, even more famously, the venerable Rachel Carson in her classic call to arms Silent Spring (1962).
In the US, large agricultural interests didn’t need much coaxing to embrace the fertilizer revolution that was catalyzed by Haber and Bosch, and later implemented on a large scale by Borlaug, the “father of the Green Revolution”, and his fellow proselytizers.
Modern Impacts
Today, not only is using the Haber-Bosch process for fertilizer production responsible for approximately 1.8% of global carbon dioxide emissions, no matter where it’s used—whether used in the Great Plains of the US, or the rice fields of Southeast Asia—nitrogen and phosphorus applications exact a price from the environment and people that apply them.
Numerous studies to date have demonstrated the deleterious impacts of Input Intensive Agriculture (IIA) on biodiversity, water quality and quantity, small farmers, food quality, and human health.
Furthermore, whether producing a percentage of the 11.9 million tons of nitrogen used by industrial agriculture in a plant in Donaldsonville, Louisiana, or a fraction of the 3.7 million tons of phosphorus used and derived from mining phosphate rock east of Tampa, Florida, we are relying on natural gas to keep the price of both processes affordable, and therein is the longest running link between “big ag” and “big oil and gas”.
CF Industries in Donaldsonville, Louisiana. Photo by Healthy Gulf c/o SouthWings
North American Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizer Producing Plants
This interactive map looks at all North American – and select international – nitrogen and phosphorus producing plants and/or mines in the case of phosphorus.
View the map “Details” tab below in the top right corner to learn more and access the data, or click on the map to explore the dynamic version of this data. Data sources are also listed at the end of this article. In order to turn layers on and off in the map, use the Layers dropdown menu. This tool is only available in Full Screen view. Items will activate in this map dependent on the level of zoom in or out.
View Full Size Map | Updated 11/1/2023 | Map Tutorial
Data
This is a map of a single data set of all North American nitrogen and phosphorus producing plants and mines, respectively. We have synthesized this data from industry reports, SEC filings, and industry associations like The Fertilizer Institute. To our knowledge, this is the most complete map of the fertilizer industry to date, however, what this map lacks is a complete inventory of each plant or mine’s annual production rates with this information inaccessible for a variety of reasons including the fact that the USGS does not share individual plant levels of production due to the proprietary way in which they receive such information from commodity producers for their annual Mineral Commodity Summaries.
We have been able to obtain reliable estimates of production, storage capacity, and/or potential capacity for 50% of the 157 facilities in this inventory but that leaves a huge “known unknown” for half of these sites, which is given even more significance given the established relationship between the fertilizer industry and environmental justice issues that run the gamut from human health impacts to algal blooms from Lake Erie to the Gulf of Mexico. What is obvious from this map is that there are significant geographic hotspots for the production of nitrogen and even more so for phosphorus. Florida is by far the largest producer of phosphorus followed by Idaho, Louisiana, Utah, New Mexico, and Saskatchewan (Table 1).
What is clear from the data we have been able to compile is that there is CF Industries in Donaldsonville, Louisiana, and then there is everyone else with this mammoth plant producing 8 million tons of nitrogen fertilizer per year which is more than the next four facilities combined. However, a closer examination of the production data for the 32 currently active nitrogen plants from 2002 to 2021 shows that while Donaldsonville is the leader in terms of percent change over that period there are other plants that have seen massive expansions including the Yara Freeport plant which has actually seen a greater expansion on a percentage basis between 2002 and 2021 than CF Industries’ Donaldsonville plant (Figure 1).
The former has expanded production by 14% per year during this period versus Donaldsonville’s 8.5%. Additionally, LSB Industries El Dorado, Arkansas, and CF Industries in Port Neal, Iowa, have experienced significant annual expansions with respective rates of growth of 8.8% and 14.8% per year albeit over a shorter time period in the case of El Dorado (2016-2021). Several plants have actually witnessed contractions in production including Dyno Nobel’s Cheyenne, Wyoming, plant (-1.6% Per Year), Nutrien’s Kenai, Alaska, plant (-4.1%), and LSB Industries’ Pryor, Oklahoma, plant (-1.4%).
Table 1. US State and Canadian Province Nitrogen and Fertilizer Plants and Mines
State or Province |
Number of Plants, Mines, or Terminals |
||
Total | Nitrogen | Phosphorus | |
Alabama | 4 | 4 | |
Arizona | 1 | 1 | |
Arkansas | 1 | 1 | |
California | 3 | 3 | |
Connecticut | 1 | 1 | |
Florida | 14 | 2 | 12 |
Georgia | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Idaho | 7 | 1 | 6 |
Illinois | 10 | 9 | |
Indiana | 6 | 6 | |
Iowa | 5 | 5 | |
Kansas | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Kentucky | 1 | 1 | |
Louisiana | 8 | 3 | 5 |
Maine | 1 | 1 | |
Michigan | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Minnesota | 2 | 2 | |
Mississippi | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Missouri | 6 | 5 | 1 |
Nebraska | 4 | 4 | |
Nevada | 1 | 1 | |
New Mexico | 3 | 3 | |
New York | 2 | 1 | 1 |
North Carolina | 2 | 1 | 1 |
North Dakota | 3 | 3 | |
Ohio | 5 | 4 | 1 |
Oklahoma | 4 | 4 | |
Oregon | 3 | 3 | |
Pennsylvania | 5 | 5 | |
Tennessee | 1 | 1 | |
Texas | 5 | 1 | 1 |
Utah | 5 | 1 | 4 |
Virginia | 4 | 4 | |
Washington | 2 | 2 | |
West Virginia | 4 | 4 | |
Wyoming | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Alberta | 8 | 8 | |
Manitoba | 1 | 1 | |
Ontario | 1 | 1 | |
Saskatchewan | 4 | 1 | 3 |
Figure 1. Annual Percent Change in Nitrogen Production for the 32 Active Anhydrous Ammonia Plants in the United States between 2002 and 2021.
The Take Away
The information provided in this interactive map is currently incomplete due to a significant lack of basic information for many of the sites depicted above and therefore warrants further investigation. Additionally, we need to look at the relationship between production and CO2 emissions by merging this data with the EPA FLIGHT data for each site in this data set because it isn’t good enough to simply look at production when it comes to industrial actors like these we must also look at emissions to understand the inefficiencies that likely are rampant across the fertilizer landscape. These will be the updates we will be focusing on during the fall and winter of 2023-2024.
Stay Informed
FracTracker Newsletter
What You Should Read Next
Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Industry Trends: Drilled Wells, Violations, Production, and Waste
A Closer Look at Risks of the Appalachian Hydrogen Hub
Falcon Pipeline Criminal Charges Explained
The Importance of Surveying Rural Landowners in North Dakota on Fracking
Exploring the Fallout of Precision Scheduled Rail: A Rail Worker’s Perspective on Precision Scheduled Rail
Not-So-Radical Transparency: An Ineffective and Unnecessary Partnership Between Pennsylvania Governor Shapiro and the Gas Company CNX
California Must Improve Management of Idle Wells
Holes in FracFocus
Mapping PFAS Chemicals Used in Fracking Operations in West Virginia
Chevron’s $2.3 Billion Asset Adjustment Raises Questions Amidst Regulatory Changes in California
Data Gaps: A Critical Examination of Oil and Gas Well Incidents in Ohio
Stop Toxic Threat: A Heavy Industrial Zoning Battle
East Palestine Warning: The Growing Threat From Hazardous Waste Storage
Index of Oil and Gas Operator Health in California Shows Risks to State Economy and Taxpayers
Calling for Change: Life on the Fracking Frontlines
On the Wrong Track: Risks to Residents of the Upper Ohio River Valley From Railroad Incidents
Digital Atlas: Exploring Nature and Industry in the Raccoon Creek Watershed
Why Do Houses Keep Exploding in One Pennsylvania Suburb?
FracTracker Alliance Releases Statement Opposing Governor Shapiro’s Agreement With CNX
Oil and Gas Activity Within California Public Health Protection Zones
Assessment of Oil and Gas Well Ownership Transfers in California
Evaluation of the Capacity for Water Recycling for Colorado Oil and Gas Extraction Operations
Evidence Shows Oil and Gas Companies Use PFAS in New Mexico Wells
CalGEM Permit Review Q1 2023: Well Rework Permits Increase by 76% in California
2022 Pipeline Incidents Update: Is Pipeline Safety Achievable?
Testimony On EPA’s Proposed Methane Pollution Standards for the Oil and Gas Industry
Assessment of Rework Permits on Oil Production from Operational Wells Within the 3,200-Foot Public Health Protection Zone
CalGEM Permit Review Q4 2022: Oil Permit Approvals Show Steep Rise Within Protective Buffer Zones
A Contentious Landscape of Pipeline Build-outs in the Eastern US
Major Gas Leak Reveals Risks of Aging Gas Storage Wells in Pennsylvania
Coursing Through Gasland: A Digital Atlas Exploring Natural Gas Development in the Towanda Creek Watershed
Falcon Pipeline Online, Begins Operations Following Violations of Clean Streams Law
Synopsis: Risks to the Greater Columbus Water Supply from Oil and Gas Production
Desalination: The Chemical Industry’s Demand for Water in Texas
Take Action in Support of No New Leases
Carbon Capture and Storage: Developments in the Law of Pore Space in North Dakota
Carbon Capture and Storage: Industry Connections and Community Impacts
Carbon Capture and Storage: Fact or Fiction?
Pipeline Right-of-Ways: Making the Connection between Forest Fragmentation and the Spread of Lyme Disease in Southwestern Pennsylvania
FracTracker Finds Widespread Hydrocarbon Emissions from Active & Idle Oil and Gas Wells and Infrastructure in California
California Regulators Approve More Oil Well Permits Amid a Crisis of Leaking Oil Wells that Should be Plugged
An Insider Take on the Appalachian Hydrogen & CCUS Conference
Does Hydrogen Have a Role in our Energy Future?
Oil and Gas Brine in Ohio
PA Environment Digest Blog: Conventional Oil & Gas Drillers Dispose Of Drill Cuttings By ‘Dusting’
Real Talk on Pipelines
2021 Production from Pennsylvania’s Oil and Gas Wells
Mapping Energy Systems Impacted by the Russia-Ukraine War
Dimock residents working to protect water from a new threat: fracking waste
Implications of a 3,200-foot Setback in California
New Trends in Drilling Permit Approvals Take Shape in CA
Oil and Gas Drilling in California Legislative Districts
New Report: Fracking with “Forever Chemicals” in Colorado
Introducing: FracTracker’s comprehensive new Pennsylvania map!
New Letter from Federal Regulators Regarding how the Falcon has Been Investigated
US Army Corps Muskingum Watershed Plan ignores local concerns of oil and gas effects
Oil and gas companies use a lot of water to extract oil in drought-stricken California
Southeastern Texas Petrochemical Industry Needs 318 Billion Gallons of Water, but the US EPA Says Not So Fast
Chickahominy Pipeline project tries to exploit an apparent regulatory loophole
Map Update on Criminal Charges Facing Mariner East 2 Pipeline
It’s Time to Stop Urban Oil Drilling in Los Angeles
Infrastructure Networks in Texas
California Prisons are Within 2,500’ of Oil and Gas Extraction
New power plant proposal called senseless and wasteful by climate groups
Ongoing Safety Concerns over Shell’s Falcon Pipeline
New Neighborhood Drilling Permits Issued While California Fails to Act on Public Health Rules
The world is watching as bitcoin battle brews in the US
California Oil & Gas Drilling Permits Drop in Response to Decreased Permit Applications to CalGEM
California Denies Well Stimulation Permits
Mapping PFAS “Forever Chemicals” in Oil & Gas Operations
Updated National Energy and Petrochemical Map
Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania Fracking Story Map
Ohio & Fracking Waste: The Case for Better Waste Management
Pennsylvania Conventional Well Map Update
Impacts of 2020 Colonial Pipeline Rupture Continue to Grow
Gas Storage Plan vs. Indigenous Rights in Nova Scotia
Mapping Gathering Lines in Bradford County, Pennsylvania
Trends in fracking waste coming to New York State from Pennsylvania
2021 Pipeline Incidents Update: Safety Record Not Improving
New York State Oil & Gas Well Drilling: Patterns Over Time
Risky Byhalia Connection Pipeline Threatens Tennessee & Mississippi Health, Water Supply
Shell’s Falcon Pipeline Under Investigation for Serious Public Safety Threats
Kern County’s Drafted EIR Will Increase the Burden for Frontline Communities
Pennsylvania’s Waste Disposal Wells – A Tale of Two Datasets
California Oil & Gas Setbacks Recommendations Memo
Oil and Gas Wells on California State Lands
Industrial Impacts in Michigan: A Photo Essay & Story Map
People and Production: Reducing Risk in California Extraction
Documenting emissions from new oil and gas wells in California
FracTracker in the Field: Building a Live Virtual Map
Mapping Gathering Lines in Ohio and West Virginia
The North Dakota Shale Viewer Reimagined: Mapping the Water and Waste Impact
Falcon Pipeline Construction Releases over 250,000 Gallons of Drilling Fluid in Pennsylvania and Ohio
Systematic Racism in Kern County Oil and Gas Permitting Ordinance
Fracking Water Use in Pennsylvania Increases Dramatically
New Yorkers mount resistance against North Brooklyn Pipeline
California, Back in Frack
California Setback Analyses Summary
Air Pollution from Pennsylvania Shale Gas Compressor Stations – REPORT
New York State Oil & Gas Wells – 2020 Update
National Energy and Petrochemical Map
Governor Newsom Must Do More to Address the Cause of Oil Spill Surface Expressions
Oil & Gas Well Permits Issued By Newsom Administration Rival Those Issued Under Gov. Jerry Brown
Pipelines Continue to Catch Fire and Explode
The Hidden Inefficiencies and Environmental Costs of Fracking in Ohio
Fracking in Pennsylvania: Not Worth It
Fracking Threatens Ohio’s Captina Creek Watershed
How State Regulations Hold Us back and What Other Countries are doing about Fracking
New Method for Locating Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells is Tested in New York State
Abandoned Wells in Pennsylvania: We’re Not Doing Enough
The Underlying Politics and Unconventional Well Fundamentals of an Appalachian Storage Hub
Permitting New Oil and Gas Wells Under the Newsom Administration
Mapping the Petrochemical Build-Out Along the Ohio River
Impact of a 2,500′ Oil and Gas Well Setback in California
Production and Location Trends in PA: A Moving Target
The Falcon Public Monitoring Project
Release: The 2019 You Are Here map launches, showing New York’s hurdles to climate leadership
Idle Wells are a Major Risk
Literally Millions of Failing, Abandoned Wells
Wicked Witch of the Waste
The Growing Web of Oil and Gas Pipelines
Unnatural Disasters
Getting Rid of All of that Waste – Increasing Use of Oil and Gas Injection Wells in Pennsylvania
A Disturbing Tale of Diminishing Returns in Ohio
Pennsylvania Drilling Trends in 2018
216 Franklin St, Suite 400, Johnstown, PA 15901
Phone: +1 (717) 303-0403 | info@fractracker.org
FracTracker Alliance is a 501(c)3 non-profit: Tax identification number: 80-0844297
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!