New mapping tool highlights carbon capture and storage (CCS) infrastructure alongside vulnerable areas in the Great Plains region.
Key Findings
CO2 pipelines carry risks that disproportionately impact Indigenous communities and communities of color.
Indigenous leaders, rural landowners, and environmentalists are uniting against CO2 pipeline expansions, citing environmental harm, eminent domain issues, and threats to cultural and ecological areas.
Overview
FracTracker Alliance and Great Plains Action Society (GPAS) have launched a new map that brings together data on carbon capture and storage (CCS) infrastructure with vital information about vulnerable areas, including Indigenous territories, sacred sites, wildlife preserves, schools, and prisons. This map, developed by FracTracker Alliance Midwest Project Coordinator Gwen Klenke in partnership with GPAS, a fully Indigenous-led organization, is a crucial resource for advocating against the increasing environmental risks posed by CCS technologies.
CO2 Pipeline Environmental Justice Map
This interactive map shows environmental justice concerns along carbon capture and storage (CCS) pipelines in the Great Plains, including proximity to Indigenous and BIPOC communities, schools, prisons, and Indigenous sacred sites.
ⓘ To navigate the map, use click-and-drag to move around and the “+” or “-” buttons to zoom. Toggle layers on the left to display specific data, and click features on the map for detailed pop-ups. Use the search bar to find locations, and check the legend to interpret map symbols and colors.
View Full Size Map | Updated 10/21/2024
The Need for Indigenous-Led Action
CO2 pipeline projects are expanding across the Midwest, particularly in states like Iowa, Nebraska, and the Dakotas, and disproportionately impact Indigenous and marginalized communities. Indigenous-led organizations like Great Plains Action Society (GPAS), led by Sikowis Nobiss, who is Plains Cree/Saulteaux from the George Gordon First Nation in Saskatchewan, Canada, have been at the forefront of resisting these pipeline expansions. Nobiss and her team stress the importance of centering Indigenous voices in the fight for environmental justice by calling attention to the dangers CO2 pipelines pose to sacred sites, ecosystems, and Indigenous ways of life.
Historically, Indigenous communities have been among the most affected by environmental degradation due to land dispossession and marginalization. The growing CCS infrastructure, including CO2 pipelines near Indigenous lands, threatens essential cultural and ecological areas. Sacred lands, wildlife habitats, and water sources integral to Indigenous lifeways are at risk from pipeline construction and potential accidents. Nobiss and GPAS have long argued that environmental justice must prioritize Indigenous knowledge and leadership. Their efforts focus on protecting not only the physical environment but also the deep cultural and spiritual connections Indigenous peoples have with their land.
The mapping tool developed by GPAS and FracTracker Alliance directly responds to the need for Indigenous-led advocacy. It provides critical data that helps Indigenous communities visualize and address environmental hazards near their lands, enabling them to take informed action to protect sacred spaces and promote environmental justice.
The No CO2 Pipelines Campaign is led by Sikowis Nobiss, is Plains Cree/Saulteaux of the George Gordon First Nation in Saskatchewan, Canada, who founded Great Plains Action Society. (Photo by Great Plains Action Society)
Why CO2 Pipelines are Dangerous
Though carbon capture and storage projects are marketed as climate solutions, CO2 pipelines carry significant risks, especially for nearby communities. For example, in the 2020 Satartia, Mississippi, incident, a CO2 pipeline rupture released a dense cloud of carbon dioxide that displaced oxygen, leading to dangerous asphyxiation hazards. CO2 is colorless and odorless, making leaks difficult to detect without proper monitoring. These incidents can incapacitate people and animals, stall vehicles, and create life-threatening conditions.
Indigenous communities are particularly vulnerable, as many CO2 pipeline routes pass close to their lands. These communities already face disproportionate harm, and additional projects like CO2 pipelines pose further threats to their health, safety, and cultural heritage.
According to research, construction of pipeline infrastructure has been linked to increased instances of violence, including sexual violence, against Indigenous peoples. This connection is often related to the presence of “man camps,” temporary housing for pipeline workers, which are frequently located near Indigenous communities. These camps bring a transient workforce that has been associated with heightened rates of drug trafficking, human trafficking, and violence, including sexual assaults against Indigenous women and girls. Studies and reports from Indigenous-led organizations have shown that the influx of non-local workers into these regions exacerbates existing vulnerabilities, making Indigenous populations, especially women, more susceptible to violence.
Pipeline construction also carries long-term environmental risks. It disturbs large areas of land, leading to habitat destruction, soil compaction, and water system disruption. In Indigenous territories, this can damage both the environment and significant cultural and spiritual sites. These risks, combined with the potential for catastrophic failures, highlight the dangers of relying on CO2 pipelines as a climate change solution.
In addition to land rights, negative impacts on soil and crop yields from pipeline construction are also a top concern for landowners along the route of the canceled Navigator CO2 pipeline. (Photo by Pipeline Fighters Hub, 2023)
Growing Resistance Across the Midwest
In addition to Indigenous leadership, rural landowners and environmentalists have joined the fight against CO2 pipelines, driven largely by concerns over eminent domain—the legal power allowing corporations to forcibly acquire private land for pipeline construction. This has alarmed many property owners and sparked widespread protests, especially in Iowa, where coalitions of landowners, farmers, and advocates have successfully resisted pipeline proposals. For example, grassroots action led to the cancellation of the Navigator Heartland Greenway pipeline.
Rural communities are also concerned about the environmental damage caused by pipeline construction, such as soil degradation and the risk of pipeline ruptures. Many argue that these projects prioritize corporate profits over local safety and well-being. The combination of Indigenous leadership and rural activism has become a powerful force against CCS infrastructure expansion in the Midwest.
A Tool for Advocacy
The environmental justice map is an invaluable resource for Indigenous and BIPOC communities. By combining real-time data with local knowledge, the tool offers a comprehensive view of the environmental risks posed by CO2 pipelines. It provides users with a clear, accessible visualization of how CCS projects intersect with Indigenous lands, sacred sites, and vulnerable communities. This tool is crucial for advocacy because it helps communities understand the threats they face and demand accountability from corporations and policymakers.
For Indigenous populations, the map is particularly essential in their ongoing efforts to protect sacred lands from CO2 pipelines and other industrial projects. By integrating data on environmental hazards, schools, prisons, and culturally significant areas, the tool empowers communities to engage with regulators and corporations in a more informed and persuasive way.
Beyond visualizing risks, the map serves as a living document that FracTracker Alliance will continuously update with the latest data on pipeline construction and environmental concerns. This ensures that communities stay informed about emerging threats and can adjust their advocacy strategies accordingly. By democratizing access to environmental data, the tool strengthens grassroots movements and elevates the voices of those most affected by environmental injustice.
Where to Learn More
Explore the environmental justice map to see how carbon pipelines threaten Indigenous lands, sacred sites, and vulnerable communities.
Join the Conversation
Stay Informed
FracTracker Newsletter
Support Our Work
FracTracker Alliance helps communicate the risks of oil and gas and petrochemical development to advance just energy alternatives that protect public health, natural resources, and the climate.
By contributing to FracTracker, you are helping to make tangible changes, such as decreasing the number of oil and gas wells in the US, protecting the public from toxic and radioactive chemicals, and stopping petrochemical expansion into vulnerable communities.
Your donations help fund the sourcing and analysis of new data so that we can keep you informed and continually update our resources.
Please donate to FracTracker today as a way to advocate for clean water, clean air, and healthy communities.
What You Should Read Next
Indigenous Communities’ Fight Against CO2 Pipelines in the Great Plains
Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Industry Trends: Drilled Wells, Violations, Production, and Waste
A Closer Look at Risks of the Appalachian Hydrogen Hub
Falcon Pipeline Criminal Charges Explained
The Importance of Surveying Rural Landowners in North Dakota on Fracking
Exploring the Fallout of Precision Scheduled Rail: A Rail Worker’s Perspective on Precision Scheduled Rail
Not-So-Radical Transparency: An Ineffective and Unnecessary Partnership Between Pennsylvania Governor Shapiro and the Gas Company CNX
California Must Improve Management of Idle Wells
Holes in FracFocus
Mapping PFAS Chemicals Used in Fracking Operations in West Virginia
Chevron’s $2.3 Billion Asset Adjustment Raises Questions Amidst Regulatory Changes in California
Data Gaps: A Critical Examination of Oil and Gas Well Incidents in Ohio
Stop Toxic Threat: A Heavy Industrial Zoning Battle
East Palestine Warning: The Growing Threat From Hazardous Waste Storage
Index of Oil and Gas Operator Health in California Shows Risks to State Economy and Taxpayers
Calling for Change: Life on the Fracking Frontlines
On the Wrong Track: Risks to Residents of the Upper Ohio River Valley From Railroad Incidents
Digital Atlas: Exploring Nature and Industry in the Raccoon Creek Watershed
Why Do Houses Keep Exploding in One Pennsylvania Suburb?
FracTracker Alliance Releases Statement Opposing Governor Shapiro’s Agreement With CNX
Oil and Gas Activity Within California Public Health Protection Zones
Assessment of Oil and Gas Well Ownership Transfers in California
Evaluation of the Capacity for Water Recycling for Colorado Oil and Gas Extraction Operations
Evidence Shows Oil and Gas Companies Use PFAS in New Mexico Wells
CalGEM Permit Review Q1 2023: Well Rework Permits Increase by 76% in California
2022 Pipeline Incidents Update: Is Pipeline Safety Achievable?
Testimony On EPA’s Proposed Methane Pollution Standards for the Oil and Gas Industry
Assessment of Rework Permits on Oil Production from Operational Wells Within the 3,200-Foot Public Health Protection Zone
CalGEM Permit Review Q4 2022: Oil Permit Approvals Show Steep Rise Within Protective Buffer Zones
A Contentious Landscape of Pipeline Build-outs in the Eastern US
Major Gas Leak Reveals Risks of Aging Gas Storage Wells in Pennsylvania
Coursing Through Gasland: A Digital Atlas Exploring Natural Gas Development in the Towanda Creek Watershed
Falcon Pipeline Online, Begins Operations Following Violations of Clean Streams Law
Synopsis: Risks to the Greater Columbus Water Supply from Oil and Gas Production
Desalination: The Chemical Industry’s Demand for Water in Texas
Take Action in Support of No New Leases
Carbon Capture and Storage: Developments in the Law of Pore Space in North Dakota
Carbon Capture and Storage: Industry Connections and Community Impacts
Carbon Capture and Storage: Fact or Fiction?
Pipeline Right-of-Ways: Making the Connection between Forest Fragmentation and the Spread of Lyme Disease in Southwestern Pennsylvania
FracTracker Finds Widespread Hydrocarbon Emissions from Active & Idle Oil and Gas Wells and Infrastructure in California
California Regulators Approve More Oil Well Permits Amid a Crisis of Leaking Oil Wells that Should be Plugged
An Insider Take on the Appalachian Hydrogen & CCUS Conference
Does Hydrogen Have a Role in our Energy Future?
Oil and Gas Brine in Ohio
PA Environment Digest Blog: Conventional Oil & Gas Drillers Dispose Of Drill Cuttings By ‘Dusting’
Real Talk on Pipelines
2021 Production from Pennsylvania’s Oil and Gas Wells
Mapping Energy Systems Impacted by the Russia-Ukraine War
Dimock residents working to protect water from a new threat: fracking waste
Implications of a 3,200-foot Setback in California
New Trends in Drilling Permit Approvals Take Shape in CA
Oil and Gas Drilling in California Legislative Districts
New Report: Fracking with “Forever Chemicals” in Colorado
Introducing: FracTracker’s comprehensive new Pennsylvania map!
New Letter from Federal Regulators Regarding how the Falcon has Been Investigated
US Army Corps Muskingum Watershed Plan ignores local concerns of oil and gas effects
Oil and gas companies use a lot of water to extract oil in drought-stricken California
Southeastern Texas Petrochemical Industry Needs 318 Billion Gallons of Water, but the US EPA Says Not So Fast
Chickahominy Pipeline project tries to exploit an apparent regulatory loophole
Map Update on Criminal Charges Facing Mariner East 2 Pipeline
It’s Time to Stop Urban Oil Drilling in Los Angeles
Infrastructure Networks in Texas
California Prisons are Within 2,500’ of Oil and Gas Extraction
New power plant proposal called senseless and wasteful by climate groups
Ongoing Safety Concerns over Shell’s Falcon Pipeline
New Neighborhood Drilling Permits Issued While California Fails to Act on Public Health Rules
The world is watching as bitcoin battle brews in the US
California Oil & Gas Drilling Permits Drop in Response to Decreased Permit Applications to CalGEM
California Denies Well Stimulation Permits
Mapping PFAS “Forever Chemicals” in Oil & Gas Operations
Updated National Energy and Petrochemical Map
Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania Fracking Story Map
Ohio & Fracking Waste: The Case for Better Waste Management
Pennsylvania Conventional Well Map Update
Impacts of 2020 Colonial Pipeline Rupture Continue to Grow
Gas Storage Plan vs. Indigenous Rights in Nova Scotia
Mapping Gathering Lines in Bradford County, Pennsylvania
Trends in fracking waste coming to New York State from Pennsylvania
2021 Pipeline Incidents Update: Safety Record Not Improving
New York State Oil & Gas Well Drilling: Patterns Over Time
Risky Byhalia Connection Pipeline Threatens Tennessee & Mississippi Health, Water Supply
Shell’s Falcon Pipeline Under Investigation for Serious Public Safety Threats
Kern County’s Drafted EIR Will Increase the Burden for Frontline Communities
Pennsylvania’s Waste Disposal Wells – A Tale of Two Datasets
California Oil & Gas Setbacks Recommendations Memo
Oil and Gas Wells on California State Lands
Industrial Impacts in Michigan: A Photo Essay & Story Map
People and Production: Reducing Risk in California Extraction
Documenting emissions from new oil and gas wells in California
FracTracker in the Field: Building a Live Virtual Map
Mapping Gathering Lines in Ohio and West Virginia
The North Dakota Shale Viewer Reimagined: Mapping the Water and Waste Impact
Falcon Pipeline Construction Releases over 250,000 Gallons of Drilling Fluid in Pennsylvania and Ohio
Systematic Racism in Kern County Oil and Gas Permitting Ordinance
Fracking Water Use in Pennsylvania Increases Dramatically
New Yorkers mount resistance against North Brooklyn Pipeline
California, Back in Frack
California Setback Analyses Summary
Air Pollution from Pennsylvania Shale Gas Compressor Stations – REPORT
New York State Oil & Gas Wells – 2020 Update
National Energy and Petrochemical Map
Governor Newsom Must Do More to Address the Cause of Oil Spill Surface Expressions
Oil & Gas Well Permits Issued By Newsom Administration Rival Those Issued Under Gov. Jerry Brown
Pipelines Continue to Catch Fire and Explode
The Hidden Inefficiencies and Environmental Costs of Fracking in Ohio
Fracking in Pennsylvania: Not Worth It
Fracking Threatens Ohio’s Captina Creek Watershed
How State Regulations Hold Us back and What Other Countries are doing about Fracking
New Method for Locating Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells is Tested in New York State
Abandoned Wells in Pennsylvania: We’re Not Doing Enough
The Underlying Politics and Unconventional Well Fundamentals of an Appalachian Storage Hub
Permitting New Oil and Gas Wells Under the Newsom Administration
Mapping the Petrochemical Build-Out Along the Ohio River
Impact of a 2,500′ Oil and Gas Well Setback in California
Production and Location Trends in PA: A Moving Target
The Falcon Public Monitoring Project
Release: The 2019 You Are Here map launches, showing New York’s hurdles to climate leadership
Idle Wells are a Major Risk
Literally Millions of Failing, Abandoned Wells
Wicked Witch of the Waste
The Growing Web of Oil and Gas Pipelines
Unnatural Disasters
Getting Rid of All of that Waste – Increasing Use of Oil and Gas Injection Wells in Pennsylvania
A Disturbing Tale of Diminishing Returns in Ohio
Pennsylvania Drilling Trends in 2018
216 Franklin St, Suite 400, Johnstown, PA 15901
Phone: +1 (717) 303-0403 | info@fractracker.org
FracTracker Alliance is a 501(c)3 non-profit: Tax identification number: 80-0844297
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!