
Fracking and the Pennsylvania Midterm Election
Share this entry
Overview
Next week, Pennsylvanians will elect a new governor and members for the U.S. and state Senate and House. The ramifications of the 2022 Pennsylvania midterm election are big, with control over the U.S. Senate hinging on the race between Dr. Mehmet Oz (R) and Lieutenant Governor John Fetterman (D). The governor’s race between Attorney General Josh Shapiro (D) and Senator Doug Mastriano (R) is also at the center of national attention, with the winner of that race stepping into a great deal of power, including the responsibility of appointing a new secretary of the Commonwealth and directors of state agencies, like the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and the Department of Health.
Our State Government and Fracking
The new public officials who are appointed as a result of the Pennsylvania midterm election will also take part in determining the direction of the fracking industry in Pennsylvania—and the country for that matter, given that Pennsylvania is the second largest gas producing state in the U.S.
It was just last week that Pennsylvania lawmakers passed a $1.97 billion package of tax credits to support the gas industry, which is now under review by Governor Wolf. The proposal grants tax credits to the petrochemical, fertilizer, hydrogen, and other industries that use fracked gas as feedstock or energy. Many state leaders, with the fossil fuel and steel industry’s support, are priming the region to become a hydrogen energy hub (falling on the heels of many other ambitious plans for “hubs” to transform the regional economy, with a somewhat low success rate).
On the other hand, new elected officials could also fight for greater public health and climate protections, like setbacks, to distance polluting infrastructure from communities. New administrations could impact regulation to combat climate change, like the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), and promote renewable energy production.
At the same time, many of the decisions about fracking happen at the local level. Local ordinances impact where fracking can occur, which is why voting in local elections and showing up to local and county meetings is of vital importance. Our Pennsylvania Shale Viewer is one tool you can take to your local officials to discuss your concerns about fracking. Not only does this map show the locations of oil and gas wells in the state, it also shows violations associated with these wells.
FracTracker’s Updated Pennsylvania Shale Viewer
This interactive map looks at oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania.
View the map “Details” tab below in the top right corner to learn more and access the data, or click on the map to explore the dynamic version of this data. Data sources are also listed at the end of this article.
In order to turn layers on and off in the map, use the Layers dropdown menu. This tool is only available in Full Screen view.
Items will activate in this map dependent on the level of zoom in or out.
View Full Size Map | Updated 10/25/2022| Map Tutorial
We updated the Pennsylvania Shale Viewer map on October 25, 2022. The map shows 13,774 drilled unconventional wells (based on spud date records, which refers to the date the well was drilled). The map also includes 194,447 conventional wells from the state’s database, with 95,929 of them listed as “active.” Many of those active wells were drilled decades ago, however, and need to be plugged. Most new wells are drilled using unconventional technology (aka fracking), and unconventional wells produce the vast majority of gas in the state.
Figure 1. This graph shows the number of unconventional wells permitted and drilled (based on spud date records) on the left hand vertical axis, and production of shale gas on the right-hand vertical axis. Wells permitted and wells drilled are from the PA Department of Environmental Protection, and production data comes from the Energy Information Administration.
*2022: January 2022 – October 25, 2022
**Production: Production values are based on gross withdrawals from shale gas wells, as determined by the Energy Information Administration
Production continues to grow, reaching record levels as the cumulative number of wells in the state increases. But despite these high numbers, the rate of permitting and drilling new wells has declined over the past six years, and is way below the peak drilling days in the early 2010s (Figure 1).
New wells in Pennsylvania demand more and more resources to produce the same amount of gas. Water usage per well, for example, has grown significantly in recent years, from an average of 5.8 million gallons per well in 2013 to over 14.3 million gallons per well in 2019. This is a glimpse into the industry’s significant resource demands and decreasing energy returned on investment.
In the meantime, renewable energy production and use has expanded in Pennsylvania, but it still makes up a small slice relative to fossil fuels. According to the Energy Information Administration, in 2020, a little under 1% of the energy produced in the state came from renewables (specifically non-combustible renewables, which include hydroelectric, geothermal, solar, and wind). When it comes to consumption, the number is slightly higher, with about 1.6% of the energy consumed in Pennsylvania coming from noncombustible renewables, and around 3.7% from biomass, and 19% from nuclear.
How Fracking Impacts Us
The buildout of the fracking industry has come at the expense of many Pennsylvanians. Dozens of peer-reviewed scientific studies have backed the experiences of frontline communities, finding that living near fracking sites is associated with illnesses including asthma, low birth weights and other adverse birth outcomes, headaches, fatigue, and mental health symptoms.
Data from state regulators also show a clear pattern of inherent risks associated with fracking.Oil and gas wells have racked up over 63,000 violations, and the Department of Environmental Protection has found 392 cases of oil and gas activities impacting a private water supply, from 2007 through 2022. Communities like Dimock, Pennsylvania that faced devastating impacts from drilling at the start of the fracking boom are still dependent on alternative sources of water and facing new impacts that come downstream of drilling, like treatment of fracking waste.
State regulators and leaders have not taken action to protect communities facing these impacts. A 2020 statewide Grand Jury report found that the Department of Health and the Department of Environmental Protection failed to respond to health and environmental impacts of fracking.
The Take Away
Fracking is one of many issues on our minds as voters send in their ballots and head to the polls next week for the Pennsylvania midterm election. But whether or not it’s at the top of our lists of concerns, our state leaders have a lot to prove when it comes to protecting communities on the frontlines of the fracking industry and boosting the state’s action on climate change.
References & Where to Learn More
- FracTracker’s Oil and Gas 101
- FracTracker’s A Guide to Petrochemicals
- Environmental Health Project: 7 Questions You Should Ask Every Candidate about Shale Gas Development
- Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA): Pennsylvania content
Topics in This Article:
Join the Conversation
Stay Informed
FracTracker Newsletter
Support Our Work
FracTracker Alliance helps communicate the risks of oil and gas and petrochemical development to advance just energy alternatives that protect public health, natural resources, and the climate.
By contributing to FracTracker, you are helping to make tangible changes, such as decreasing the number of oil and gas wells in the US, protecting the public from toxic and radioactive chemicals, and stopping petrochemical expansion into vulnerable communities.
Your donations help fund the sourcing and analysis of new data so that we can keep you informed and continually update our resources.
Please donate to FracTracker today as a way to advocate for clean water, clean air, and healthy communities.
What You Should Read Next


Environmental Justice Analysis of Oil Extraction in Los Angeles Communities

How Increased Protective Buffer Zones Could Help Protect 3.6 million Pennsylvanians

Regulatory Gaps and Resistance: The Battle Over Fracking in Southern Illinois

Can California Energy Policy Move Past its Contradictions?

Data Gaps: A Critical Examination of Oil and Gas Well Incidents in Ohio

Indigenous Communities’ Fight Against CO2 Pipelines in the Great Plains

Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Industry Trends: Drilled Wells, Violations, Production, and Waste

A Closer Look at Risks of the Appalachian Hydrogen Hub

Falcon Pipeline Criminal Charges Explained

The Importance of Surveying Rural Landowners in North Dakota on Fracking

Exploring the Fallout of Precision Scheduled Rail: A Rail Worker’s Perspective on Precision Scheduled Rail

Not-So-Radical Transparency: An Ineffective and Unnecessary Partnership Between Pennsylvania Governor Shapiro and the Gas Company CNX

California Must Improve Management of Idle Wells

Holes in FracFocus

Mapping PFAS Chemicals Used in Fracking Operations in West Virginia

Chevron’s $2.3 Billion Asset Adjustment Raises Questions Amidst Regulatory Changes in California

Stop Toxic Threat: A Heavy Industrial Zoning Battle

East Palestine Warning: The Growing Threat From Hazardous Waste Storage

Index of Oil and Gas Operator Health in California Shows Risks to State Economy and Taxpayers

Calling for Change: Life on the Fracking Frontlines

On the Wrong Track: Risks to Residents of the Upper Ohio River Valley From Railroad Incidents

Digital Atlas: Exploring Nature and Industry in the Raccoon Creek Watershed

Why Do Houses Keep Exploding in One Pennsylvania Suburb?

FracTracker Alliance Releases Statement Opposing Governor Shapiro’s Agreement With CNX

Oil and Gas Activity Within California Public Health Protection Zones

Assessment of Oil and Gas Well Ownership Transfers in California

Evaluation of the Capacity for Water Recycling for Colorado Oil and Gas Extraction Operations

Evidence Shows Oil and Gas Companies Use PFAS in New Mexico Wells

CalGEM Permit Review Q1 2023: Well Rework Permits Increase by 76% in California

2022 Pipeline Incidents Update: Is Pipeline Safety Achievable?

Testimony On EPA’s Proposed Methane Pollution Standards for the Oil and Gas Industry

Assessment of Rework Permits on Oil Production from Operational Wells Within the 3,200-Foot Public Health Protection Zone

CalGEM Permit Review Q4 2022: Oil Permit Approvals Show Steep Rise Within Protective Buffer Zones

A Contentious Landscape of Pipeline Build-outs in the Eastern US

Major Gas Leak Reveals Risks of Aging Gas Storage Wells in Pennsylvania

Coursing Through Gasland: A Digital Atlas Exploring Natural Gas Development in the Towanda Creek Watershed

Falcon Pipeline Online, Begins Operations Following Violations of Clean Streams Law

Synopsis: Risks to the Greater Columbus Water Supply from Oil and Gas Production

Desalination: The Chemical Industry’s Demand for Water in Texas

Take Action in Support of No New Leases

Carbon Capture and Storage: Developments in the Law of Pore Space in North Dakota

Carbon Capture and Storage: Industry Connections and Community Impacts

Carbon Capture and Storage: Fact or Fiction?

Pipeline Right-of-Ways: Making the Connection between Forest Fragmentation and the Spread of Lyme Disease in Southwestern Pennsylvania

FracTracker Finds Widespread Hydrocarbon Emissions from Active & Idle Oil and Gas Wells and Infrastructure in California

California Regulators Approve More Oil Well Permits Amid a Crisis of Leaking Oil Wells that Should be Plugged

An Insider Take on the Appalachian Hydrogen & CCUS Conference

Does Hydrogen Have a Role in our Energy Future?

Oil and Gas Brine in Ohio

PA Environment Digest Blog: Conventional Oil & Gas Drillers Dispose Of Drill Cuttings By ‘Dusting’

Real Talk on Pipelines

2021 Production from Pennsylvania’s Oil and Gas Wells

Mapping Energy Systems Impacted by the Russia-Ukraine War

Dimock residents working to protect water from a new threat: fracking waste

Implications of a 3,200-foot Setback in California

New Trends in Drilling Permit Approvals Take Shape in CA

Oil and Gas Drilling in California Legislative Districts

New Report: Fracking with “Forever Chemicals” in Colorado

Introducing: FracTracker’s comprehensive new Pennsylvania map!

New Letter from Federal Regulators Regarding how the Falcon has Been Investigated

US Army Corps Muskingum Watershed Plan ignores local concerns of oil and gas effects

Oil and gas companies use a lot of water to extract oil in drought-stricken California

Southeastern Texas Petrochemical Industry Needs 318 Billion Gallons of Water, but the US EPA Says Not So Fast

Chickahominy Pipeline project tries to exploit an apparent regulatory loophole

Map Update on Criminal Charges Facing Mariner East 2 Pipeline

It’s Time to Stop Urban Oil Drilling in Los Angeles

Infrastructure Networks in Texas

California Prisons are Within 2,500’ of Oil and Gas Extraction

New power plant proposal called senseless and wasteful by climate groups

Ongoing Safety Concerns over Shell’s Falcon Pipeline

New Neighborhood Drilling Permits Issued While California Fails to Act on Public Health Rules

The world is watching as bitcoin battle brews in the US


California Oil & Gas Drilling Permits Drop in Response to Decreased Permit Applications to CalGEM

California Denies Well Stimulation Permits

Mapping PFAS “Forever Chemicals” in Oil & Gas Operations

Updated National Energy and Petrochemical Map

Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania Fracking Story Map

Ohio & Fracking Waste: The Case for Better Waste Management

Pennsylvania Conventional Well Map Update

Impacts of 2020 Colonial Pipeline Rupture Continue to Grow

Gas Storage Plan vs. Indigenous Rights in Nova Scotia

Mapping Gathering Lines in Bradford County, Pennsylvania

Trends in fracking waste coming to New York State from Pennsylvania

2021 Pipeline Incidents Update: Safety Record Not Improving

New York State Oil & Gas Well Drilling: Patterns Over Time

Risky Byhalia Connection Pipeline Threatens Tennessee & Mississippi Health, Water Supply

Shell’s Falcon Pipeline Under Investigation for Serious Public Safety Threats

Kern County’s Drafted EIR Will Increase the Burden for Frontline Communities

Pennsylvania’s Waste Disposal Wells – A Tale of Two Datasets

California Oil & Gas Setbacks Recommendations Memo

Oil and Gas Wells on California State Lands

Industrial Impacts in Michigan: A Photo Essay & Story Map

People and Production: Reducing Risk in California Extraction

Documenting emissions from new oil and gas wells in California


FracTracker in the Field: Building a Live Virtual Map


Mapping Gathering Lines in Ohio and West Virginia

The North Dakota Shale Viewer Reimagined: Mapping the Water and Waste Impact

Falcon Pipeline Construction Releases over 250,000 Gallons of Drilling Fluid in Pennsylvania and Ohio

Systematic Racism in Kern County Oil and Gas Permitting Ordinance

Fracking Water Use in Pennsylvania Increases Dramatically

New Yorkers mount resistance against North Brooklyn Pipeline

California, Back in Frack

California Setback Analyses Summary

Air Pollution from Pennsylvania Shale Gas Compressor Stations – REPORT

New York State Oil & Gas Wells – 2020 Update

National Energy and Petrochemical Map

Governor Newsom Must Do More to Address the Cause of Oil Spill Surface Expressions

Oil & Gas Well Permits Issued By Newsom Administration Rival Those Issued Under Gov. Jerry Brown

Pipelines Continue to Catch Fire and Explode

The Hidden Inefficiencies and Environmental Costs of Fracking in Ohio

Fracking in Pennsylvania: Not Worth It

Fracking Threatens Ohio’s Captina Creek Watershed


How State Regulations Hold Us back and What Other Countries are doing about Fracking

New Method for Locating Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells is Tested in New York State


Abandoned Wells in Pennsylvania: We’re Not Doing Enough


The Underlying Politics and Unconventional Well Fundamentals of an Appalachian Storage Hub

Permitting New Oil and Gas Wells Under the Newsom Administration

Mapping the Petrochemical Build-Out Along the Ohio River

Impact of a 2,500′ Oil and Gas Well Setback in California

Production and Location Trends in PA: A Moving Target

The Falcon Public Monitoring Project

Release: The 2019 You Are Here map launches, showing New York’s hurdles to climate leadership

Idle Wells are a Major Risk

Literally Millions of Failing, Abandoned Wells

Wicked Witch of the Waste

The Growing Web of Oil and Gas Pipelines

Unnatural Disasters

Getting Rid of All of that Waste – Increasing Use of Oil and Gas Injection Wells in Pennsylvania

A Disturbing Tale of Diminishing Returns in Ohio

Pennsylvania Drilling Trends in 2018
216 Franklin St, Suite 400, Johnstown, PA 15901
Phone: +1 (717) 303-0403 | info@fractracker.org
FracTracker Alliance is a 501(c)3 non-profit: Tax identification number: 80-0844297