
2022 Pipeline Incidents Update: Is Pipeline Safety Achievable?
Share this entry
Overview
Since 2013, FracTracker has been periodically examining pipeline incidents that are reported to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). In addition to providing top-level incident summaries, this article also examines whether safe oversight of the industry is possible, as well as the likelihood of expanded use of pipelines for hydrogen and carbon dioxide.
PHMSA Pipeline and LNG Plant Incidents (January 2023)
This interactive map looks at six different datasets of incidents that were reported to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). The files were all downloaded on January 19, 2023. The webpage at the time indicated that the most recent updates were December 30, 2022.
View the map “Details” tab below in the top right corner to learn more and access the data, or click on the map to explore the dynamic version of this data. Data sources are also listed at the end of this article.
In order to turn layers on and off in the map, use the Layers dropdown menu. This tool is only available in Full Screen view.
Items will activate in this map dependent on the level of zoom in or out.
View Full Size Map | Updated 2/1/2023 | Map Tutorial
Incident Categories
PHMSA has three categories of pipelines that it has been reporting on for decades – gas distribution, hazardous liquids, and gas transmission & gathering lines. The data structure for each of these changed substantially in January 2010, so FracTracker maps incidents in this timeframe. Older data is much more complicated to integrate, error prone, and generally less in demand.
There are three additional categories of reports that have been published since January 2010 – liquefied natural gas incidents, starting in January 2011; hazardous liquid gravity and “reporting-regulated-only” gathering accidents since January 2021; and Type R (reporting-regulated) gas gathering incidents, published since May 2022.
These last few categories introduce some overlapping themes, with three different reports claiming inclusion of gathering lines, for example. PHMSA estimates that while only about 5% of gathering lines nationwide are even subject to the agency’s regulation, all gathering lines are required to report incidents and file annual reports as of 2021, explaining the “reporting-regulated” language in the report titles.
Understanding the Data
The thematic overlap begs the question as to whether there is overlap of content, which is to say, are individual incidents reported in more than one category? While it is difficult to say conclusively, this does not appear to be the case. One bit of clarity is that the new report lumping gravity-fed liquid pipelines with gas gathering lines seems to include only the former, and none of the latter. Presumably, the agency saw fit to separate these reporting-regulated incidents into different reports in May 2022 because they are fundamentally dissimilar to one another.
The category of liquified natural gas (LNG) incidents would also seem to be redundant with the hazardous liquid category, which includes “LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) / NGL (natural gas liquid)” as one of the subcategories of highly volatile liquids. However, these datasets are distinct because incidents on the LNG dataset occurred at plants and terminals, not pipelines.
With over 8,000 incidents, it would be difficult to conclusively state that there was not overlap between incidents on these six reports. However, if overlaps do occur, the phenomenon isn’t very frequent. We can say this much with confidence because these three newer reports which introduce the possibility of overlap are used infrequently compared to the three original categories.
It is worth noting that only two of the 36 entries (5.5%) on the LNG plant layer include latitude and longitude coordinates, nor do they include the county, municipality, and zip code data that is standard on the other reports. There are columns for the operator’s address on the report, but there is no guarantee that the incident occurred at the company’s provided mailing address. In fact, in some cases, the mailing address state and incident state are not the same. Whether intentional or not, accurate location data is effectively obfuscated by these omissions. However, we were able to match many of the facilities to a dataset published by the US Department of Homeland Security, with the remainder found on Google Maps and with the help of local news sites.
Summary of Incidents
In the 4,767 days between the January 1, 2010, start of the reporting period and the download date of January 19, 2023, a total of 8,140 pipeline incidents were reported to PHMSA, an average of 1.7 incidents per day. This is consistent with previous FracTracker analyses of pipeline incidents.
Category | Gas Distribution | Hazardous Liquids | Gas Transmission & Gathering | Liquefied Natural Gas Plants | Hazardous Liquid Gravity | Reporting Regulated Gas Gathering | All Incidents |
Start Date | January 1, 2010 | January 1, 2010 | January 1, 2010 | January 1, 2011 | January 1, 2021 | May 1, 2022 | January 1, 2010 |
Incidents | 1,358 | 4,949 | 1,597 | 36 | 192 | 8 | 8,140 |
Fatalities | 117 | 15 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 164 |
Injuries | 577 | 39 | 120 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 737 |
Evacuees | 29,116 | 3,004 | 14,193 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 46,463 |
Property Damage | $2,491,841,333 | $3,247,681,694 | $1,653,894,464 | $153,998,900 | $14,547,503 | $10,836,239 | $7,572,800,133 |
Fires | 791 | 158 | 175 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1,135 |
Explosions | 300 | 19 | 70 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 392 |
Table 1. Summary of pipeline incidents between January 1, 2010 and January 19, 2023.
On the average day in the United States over the last 13 years, $1,588,588 worth of property damage is caused by pipeline incidents, a figure that includes lost product. On average, 9.7 people are evacuated per day, a fire erupts every 4.2 days, and an explosion occurs every 12.2 days. A person is killed by a pipeline incident every 29 days, on average, and an injury is reported every 6.5 days.
Is Effective Regulation Possible?
After reviewing the summary of pipeline incidents, it seems like a good opportunity to remind ourselves of PHMSA’s mission:
PHMSA’s mission is to protect people and the environment by advancing the safe transportation of energy and other hazardous materials that are essential to our daily lives. To do this, the agency establishes national policy, sets and enforces standards, educates, and conducts research to prevent incidents. We also prepare the public and first responders to reduce consequences if an incident does occur.
As the track record shows, there is clearly more work to be done at the agency to meet their objectives, but it could be that no amount of dutiful regulation can possibly achieve this. The paradox is baked into the first sentence, where the agency claims to be, “…advancing the safe transportation of energy and other hazardous materials….” The materials that PHMSA regulates in these vast pipeline networks are highly combustible, planet warming, and frequently poisonous – in short, inherently dangerous to both people and the environment. At best, the concept of safety in this context is like Polaris, the North Star, in that while it exists as a distant guide, it will never be within reach.
What Does the Future Hold?
The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 includes substantial federal subsidies, which accompany numerous state subsidies for the development of hydrogen as an energy source. Along with this comes the development of carbon capture technology, on the dubious claim that it will prevent hydrogen derived from fossil fuels from a catastrophic contribution to atmospheric carbon, and in turn, planetary warming.
With the generous subsidies in place, we may soon be talking less about whether the carbon capture plan holds water and more about whether the thousands of additional miles of pipelines that will likely be built with this money can hold hydrogen and carbon dioxide.
The US Department of Energy (DOE) states that hydrogen can be transported through pipelines, and that indeed, about 1,600 miles are already operational. While this represents a miniscule fraction of the nation’s 3.3 million mile pipeline network, the number is likely to grow with the federal and state subsidies in place. As DOE points out, hydrogen is prone to leaks due to the small molecule size because it embrittles steel and metal welds in pipeline infrastructure, leading the department to suggest that fiber covered polymer pipes (perhaps similar to fiberglass) might be appropriate. Of course, such polymers would help to keep demand for petrochemical plants higher as well.
DOE also suggests the possibility of blending hydrogen with the existing gas stream. In one of numerous similar projects around the country, SoCalGas and the University of California, Irvine “…proposed collaboration to demonstrate how electrolytic hydrogen can be safely blended into existing natural gas infrastructure on the university’s campus.” Of course, the analogy of safety as the north star applies in this situation, as well. Some researchers who have already evaluated the idea claim that it won’t work. According to Energy Innovation, this blending, “would increase consumer costs, exacerbate air pollution, and cause safety risks while minimally reducing greenhouse gasses.”
Carbon dioxide pipelines can be problematic as well. Sixty-eight of the incidents in the Hazardous Liquids report were for pipelines carrying carbon dioxide on just 5,000 miles of pipe, or an incident every 73.5 miles since 2010, which compares poorly to the average of one incident per 405.4 miles for the entire 3.3 million mile pipeline system.
One of these incidents occurred on February 22, 2020, in Yazoo County, Mississippi, where more than 300 people were evacuated and 45 people sent to the hospital, according to the local Clarion Ledger. A local sheriff’s investigator said that the affected people were, “acting like zombies,” while the local emergency management director said that some of them were, “foaming at the mouth.” Incidentally, on the PHMSA incident report, the operator Denbury Gulf Coast Pipelines, LLC indicated just 200 evacuations and no injuries, reminding us of the questionable reliability of self-reporting. They claim that a weld failed on a segment of pipe that was laid in 2009 as a result of earth movement that was in turn caused by heavy rains, and that the pipeline was code compliant.
We would argue that if the pipeline was code compliant, then the code itself failed to protect people and the environment from the effects of heavy rain, a condition that is sure to occur repeatedly in the future.
Is There Another Way?
In just over 13 years, the 8,140 pipeline incidents in the United States resulted in 164 deaths, 737 injuries, 1,135 fires, 392 explosions, 46,463 people evacuated, and $7.57 billion in property damage. As we see with the Yazoo County incident, some of these impacts could be significantly under-reported, as that single incident failed to account for 100 evacuees and 45 people hospitalized, according to local news sources. Clearly, the track record of pipelines in the US falls well short of the aspirational but poorly defined goal of “safe.”
Therefore, this is not an industry that should consider rapid expansion, particularly when the target gasses of hydrogen and carbon dioxide both seem to be highly problematic. The poorly-studied idea of blending hydrogen with methane gas could have significant impacts on the nation’s pipeline network, with hydrogen’s known tendency for weakening metal pipe being just one factor that should single-handedly extinguish talks of large-scale blending in existing pipes. Hydrogen is also a tiny molecule that is prone to leakage, a problem that even NASA has a difficult time dealing with. Carbon dioxide pipelines are already much more prone to incidents than the full network of pipelines, which overwhelmingly carry methane gas and other petroleum products.
Not to belabor the point, but there is one more item in that first sentence of PHMSA’s mission statement that is worth focusing on here: “PHMSA’s mission is to protect people and the environment by advancing the safe transportation of energy and other hazardous materials that are essential to our daily lives.” Indeed, are additional pipelines essential to our daily lives? The evidence from the incident reports suggest that they are instead detrimental.
And of course, there are alternatives. Renewable energy sources don’t rely on pipelines at all and are much safer for the environment and public health. Europe is rapidly expanding its renewable energy portfolio, accounting for 37% of electricity consumption in 2020. In the United States, that figure was just 17% in 2019 according to the Energy Information Administration, despite the fact that the solar power potential in the US is much higher than most of Europe and the wind power potential is at least comparable. As with fossil fuels in general, investments in pipeline infrastructure is an investment in the past when the technology for a cleaner and safer tomorrow already exists today.
The Take Away
Since 2013, FracTracker has been periodically examining pipeline incidents that are reported to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). In addition to providing top-level incident summaries, this article also examines whether safe oversight of the industry is possible, as well as the likelihood of expanded use of pipelines for hydrogen and carbon dioxide.
In the 4,767 days between the January 1, 2010, start of the reporting period and the download date of January 19, 2023, a total of 8,140 pipeline incidents were reported to PHMSA, an average of 1.7 incidents per day. This is consistent with previous FracTracker analyses of pipeline incidents.
References & Where to Learn More
Topics in This Article:
Join the Conversation
Comments are closed.
Stay Informed
FracTracker Newsletter
Support Our Work
FracTracker Alliance helps communicate the risks of oil and gas and petrochemical development to advance just energy alternatives that protect public health, natural resources, and the climate.
By contributing to FracTracker, you are helping to make tangible changes, such as decreasing the number of oil and gas wells in the US, protecting the public from toxic and radioactive chemicals, and stopping petrochemical expansion into vulnerable communities.
Your donations help fund the sourcing and analysis of new data so that we can keep you informed and continually update our resources.
Please donate to FracTracker today as a way to advocate for clean water, clean air, and healthy communities.
What You Should Read Next


Pipeline Incidents Are a Daily Occurrence

Environmental Justice Analysis of Oil Extraction in Los Angeles Communities

How Increased Protective Buffer Zones Could Help Protect 3.6 million Pennsylvanians

Regulatory Gaps and Resistance: The Battle Over Fracking in Southern Illinois

Can California Energy Policy Move Past its Contradictions?

Data Gaps: A Critical Examination of Oil and Gas Well Incidents in Ohio

Indigenous Communities’ Fight Against CO2 Pipelines in the Great Plains

Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Industry Trends: Drilled Wells, Violations, Production, and Waste

A Closer Look at Risks of the Appalachian Hydrogen Hub

Falcon Pipeline Criminal Charges Explained

The Importance of Surveying Rural Landowners in North Dakota on Fracking

Exploring the Fallout of Precision Scheduled Rail: A Rail Worker’s Perspective on Precision Scheduled Rail

Not-So-Radical Transparency: An Ineffective and Unnecessary Partnership Between Pennsylvania Governor Shapiro and the Gas Company CNX

California Must Improve Management of Idle Wells

Holes in FracFocus

Mapping PFAS Chemicals Used in Fracking Operations in West Virginia

Chevron’s $2.3 Billion Asset Adjustment Raises Questions Amidst Regulatory Changes in California

Stop Toxic Threat: A Heavy Industrial Zoning Battle

East Palestine Warning: The Growing Threat From Hazardous Waste Storage

Index of Oil and Gas Operator Health in California Shows Risks to State Economy and Taxpayers

Calling for Change: Life on the Fracking Frontlines

On the Wrong Track: Risks to Residents of the Upper Ohio River Valley From Railroad Incidents

Digital Atlas: Exploring Nature and Industry in the Raccoon Creek Watershed

Why Do Houses Keep Exploding in One Pennsylvania Suburb?

FracTracker Alliance Releases Statement Opposing Governor Shapiro’s Agreement With CNX

Oil and Gas Activity Within California Public Health Protection Zones

Assessment of Oil and Gas Well Ownership Transfers in California

Evaluation of the Capacity for Water Recycling for Colorado Oil and Gas Extraction Operations

Evidence Shows Oil and Gas Companies Use PFAS in New Mexico Wells

CalGEM Permit Review Q1 2023: Well Rework Permits Increase by 76% in California

2022 Pipeline Incidents Update: Is Pipeline Safety Achievable?

Testimony On EPA’s Proposed Methane Pollution Standards for the Oil and Gas Industry

Assessment of Rework Permits on Oil Production from Operational Wells Within the 3,200-Foot Public Health Protection Zone

CalGEM Permit Review Q4 2022: Oil Permit Approvals Show Steep Rise Within Protective Buffer Zones

A Contentious Landscape of Pipeline Build-outs in the Eastern US

Major Gas Leak Reveals Risks of Aging Gas Storage Wells in Pennsylvania

Coursing Through Gasland: A Digital Atlas Exploring Natural Gas Development in the Towanda Creek Watershed

Falcon Pipeline Online, Begins Operations Following Violations of Clean Streams Law

Synopsis: Risks to the Greater Columbus Water Supply from Oil and Gas Production

Desalination: The Chemical Industry’s Demand for Water in Texas

Take Action in Support of No New Leases

Carbon Capture and Storage: Developments in the Law of Pore Space in North Dakota

Carbon Capture and Storage: Industry Connections and Community Impacts

Carbon Capture and Storage: Fact or Fiction?

Pipeline Right-of-Ways: Making the Connection between Forest Fragmentation and the Spread of Lyme Disease in Southwestern Pennsylvania

FracTracker Finds Widespread Hydrocarbon Emissions from Active & Idle Oil and Gas Wells and Infrastructure in California

California Regulators Approve More Oil Well Permits Amid a Crisis of Leaking Oil Wells that Should be Plugged

An Insider Take on the Appalachian Hydrogen & CCUS Conference

Does Hydrogen Have a Role in our Energy Future?

Oil and Gas Brine in Ohio

PA Environment Digest Blog: Conventional Oil & Gas Drillers Dispose Of Drill Cuttings By ‘Dusting’

Real Talk on Pipelines

2021 Production from Pennsylvania’s Oil and Gas Wells

Mapping Energy Systems Impacted by the Russia-Ukraine War

Dimock residents working to protect water from a new threat: fracking waste

Implications of a 3,200-foot Setback in California

New Trends in Drilling Permit Approvals Take Shape in CA

Oil and Gas Drilling in California Legislative Districts

New Report: Fracking with “Forever Chemicals” in Colorado

Introducing: FracTracker’s comprehensive new Pennsylvania map!

New Letter from Federal Regulators Regarding how the Falcon has Been Investigated

US Army Corps Muskingum Watershed Plan ignores local concerns of oil and gas effects

Oil and gas companies use a lot of water to extract oil in drought-stricken California

Southeastern Texas Petrochemical Industry Needs 318 Billion Gallons of Water, but the US EPA Says Not So Fast

Chickahominy Pipeline project tries to exploit an apparent regulatory loophole

Map Update on Criminal Charges Facing Mariner East 2 Pipeline

It’s Time to Stop Urban Oil Drilling in Los Angeles

Infrastructure Networks in Texas

California Prisons are Within 2,500’ of Oil and Gas Extraction

New power plant proposal called senseless and wasteful by climate groups

Ongoing Safety Concerns over Shell’s Falcon Pipeline

New Neighborhood Drilling Permits Issued While California Fails to Act on Public Health Rules

The world is watching as bitcoin battle brews in the US


California Oil & Gas Drilling Permits Drop in Response to Decreased Permit Applications to CalGEM

California Denies Well Stimulation Permits

Mapping PFAS “Forever Chemicals” in Oil & Gas Operations

Updated National Energy and Petrochemical Map

Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania Fracking Story Map

Ohio & Fracking Waste: The Case for Better Waste Management

Pennsylvania Conventional Well Map Update

Impacts of 2020 Colonial Pipeline Rupture Continue to Grow

Gas Storage Plan vs. Indigenous Rights in Nova Scotia

Mapping Gathering Lines in Bradford County, Pennsylvania

Trends in fracking waste coming to New York State from Pennsylvania

2021 Pipeline Incidents Update: Safety Record Not Improving

New York State Oil & Gas Well Drilling: Patterns Over Time

Risky Byhalia Connection Pipeline Threatens Tennessee & Mississippi Health, Water Supply

Shell’s Falcon Pipeline Under Investigation for Serious Public Safety Threats

Kern County’s Drafted EIR Will Increase the Burden for Frontline Communities

Pennsylvania’s Waste Disposal Wells – A Tale of Two Datasets

California Oil & Gas Setbacks Recommendations Memo

Oil and Gas Wells on California State Lands

Industrial Impacts in Michigan: A Photo Essay & Story Map

People and Production: Reducing Risk in California Extraction

Documenting emissions from new oil and gas wells in California


FracTracker in the Field: Building a Live Virtual Map


Mapping Gathering Lines in Ohio and West Virginia

The North Dakota Shale Viewer Reimagined: Mapping the Water and Waste Impact

Falcon Pipeline Construction Releases over 250,000 Gallons of Drilling Fluid in Pennsylvania and Ohio

Systematic Racism in Kern County Oil and Gas Permitting Ordinance

Fracking Water Use in Pennsylvania Increases Dramatically

New Yorkers mount resistance against North Brooklyn Pipeline

California, Back in Frack

California Setback Analyses Summary

Air Pollution from Pennsylvania Shale Gas Compressor Stations – REPORT

New York State Oil & Gas Wells – 2020 Update

National Energy and Petrochemical Map

Governor Newsom Must Do More to Address the Cause of Oil Spill Surface Expressions

Oil & Gas Well Permits Issued By Newsom Administration Rival Those Issued Under Gov. Jerry Brown

Pipelines Continue to Catch Fire and Explode

The Hidden Inefficiencies and Environmental Costs of Fracking in Ohio

Fracking in Pennsylvania: Not Worth It

Fracking Threatens Ohio’s Captina Creek Watershed


How State Regulations Hold Us back and What Other Countries are doing about Fracking

New Method for Locating Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells is Tested in New York State


Abandoned Wells in Pennsylvania: We’re Not Doing Enough


The Underlying Politics and Unconventional Well Fundamentals of an Appalachian Storage Hub

Permitting New Oil and Gas Wells Under the Newsom Administration

Mapping the Petrochemical Build-Out Along the Ohio River

Impact of a 2,500′ Oil and Gas Well Setback in California

Production and Location Trends in PA: A Moving Target

The Falcon Public Monitoring Project

Release: The 2019 You Are Here map launches, showing New York’s hurdles to climate leadership

Idle Wells are a Major Risk

Literally Millions of Failing, Abandoned Wells

Wicked Witch of the Waste

The Growing Web of Oil and Gas Pipelines

Unnatural Disasters

Getting Rid of All of that Waste – Increasing Use of Oil and Gas Injection Wells in Pennsylvania

A Disturbing Tale of Diminishing Returns in Ohio

Pennsylvania Drilling Trends in 2018
216 Franklin St, Suite 400, Johnstown, PA 15901
Phone: +1 (717) 303-0403 | info@fractracker.org
FracTracker Alliance is a 501(c)3 non-profit: Tax identification number: 80-0844297
Fabulous report! Kudos to Fractracker Alliance. This report deserves WIDE circulation. Keep up the GREAT work, y’all. Thank you.