Introducing the New FracTracker U.S. Data Centers Tracker Dashboard

KATIE JONESOhio River Valley Coordinator | Published April 7, 2026

Key Findings

The dashboard builds on our continuously updated national data center map by integrating additional context on dedicated tabs including advocacy details, demographics, environmental justice designations, tribal lands, chronic disease rates, the surrounding energy landscape (such as power plants and balancing authorities), and environmental factors like air quality and water resources.

Of the 1,400+ sites included in the tracker, we are tracking 803 projects in the pre-development or construction process, highlighting an ongoing window in which permitting processes, regulatory decisions, and community engagement can still influence development outcomes.

Analysis of advocacy efforts shows that public resistance to data centers is widespread and growing, interventions employ a wide variety of strategies, and efforts are starting to achieve success.

Data Centers Tracker

Why Track Data Centers?

Since mid-2025, data center proposals have been popping up across the country at lightning speed. A hyperscale data center is defined by industry as a facility with at least 5,000 computer servers, 10,000 square feet of physical space, and an electric power rating (energy demand or power load) of at least 100 megawatts (MW).

Data center development is increasingly tied to broader public health, environmental, and energy concerns. Since the electricity demands of data centers are so high, these facilities have the potential to perpetuate the operations of legacy polluters, strain local power grids, and drive new fossil fuel infrastructure projects like fracked wells and power plants. This increase in fossil fuel activity means that data centers indirectly contribute to increased greenhouse gas and pollutant emissions that harm public health and our climate. Data centers can also create direct harmful pollution onsite by utilizing diesel generators for backup power, create noise and light pollution, and consume enormous amounts of water for equipment cooling.

Economically, hyperscale data centers harm local communities by increasing utility bills for everyday ratepayers, consuming tax dollars that could be better allocated to community needs, and failing to deliver on economic promises like job creation. A data center employs an average of 27 people once it is operational, which is a very small trade off considering the billions of dollars in subsidies that these facilities are receiving. Many of the jobs actually supported by data center development are indirect jobs linked to the fossil fuel industry, which impose high risks on its employees. For example, truck drivers that haul fracking waste are exposed to unregulated hazardous waste that can lead to cancer and other health problems.

In July 2025, FracTracker Alliance released the first iteration of our National Data Centers Tracker, which built on prior work tracking cryptocurrency operations. Our tracker is the first open-access, facility-level dataset and interactive mapping tool that documents the rapid buildout of AI and data center infrastructure across the United States. It can be downloaded, shared, and used by anyone for non-commercial purposes (please see our terms of service). This transparency is essential for accountability and advocacy. Data center expansion is outpacing both regulation and public awareness, and has often bypassed meaningful public input. Without transparent, facility-level information, communities cannot effectively advocate for local protections and researchers and decision makers cannot assess the potential impacts of existing and proposed data centers.

We have been updating the tracker daily and crowdsourcing data to gather information from advocates and other interested parties. Each announcement prompts a mini-research project to gather key information. Our online documentation presents a history of relevant news and developments as we follow each proposal through different stages of development. We focus on proposed sites and projects under construction, and we are working to incorporate smaller data centers already in operation.

What’s New

The National Data Centers Tracker is now set up as a dashboard with dedicated tabs. Each tab has data layers that can be toggled on and off using the left layer menu.

Map Tab

This section shows the same data as our original map, with notable expansions.

Critical information is maintained such as address and geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude), the name of the operating company and/or tenant, reported energy demand in megawatts (MW), estimated square footage and acreage of the facilities, power sourcing (dedicated power plants of various types or grid-connected), and cooling method and type (air, water, closed loop, open loop, etc).
Data center pins are colored according to status including:
- Proposed – Anything planned, announced, in permitting, or awaiting approval.
- Approved/Permitted/Under Construction – Actively being built, site prep underway, or construction start date confirmed.
- Expanding – Existing data center or related computing center that is scaling up operations.
- Operating – Fully built and operational.
- Suspended – Temporarily halted, on hold, or delayed without being cancelled, including projects that the developer plans to continue pursuing despite being blocked from one location.
- Cancelled – Plans dropped, defeated, denied, rescinded, rejected, or explicitly blocked by authorities/community.
Data center pins varied by size depending on the MW power demand of the facility:
- Small pins – 0-99 MW
- Medium pins – 100-1,000 MW (hyperscale)
- Large pins – 1 gigawatt (GW) + (mega campus)
*NEW* We’ve expanded our filters to include state, county, status, and hyperscale size (100+ MW).
*NEW* In the right column you can quickly see the total number of projects, MW, and square footage for different categories of data centers. These totals update depending on zoom level and filter selection, and not all data centers have MW or square footage estimates to contribute to these totals.
*NEW* Use the search bar at the top of the map to quickly find a location or data center of interest.
*NEW* Advocacy-focused fields are now available in the map pop-ups including petitions, community group webpages, site fight leaders, opportunities for public engagement, and examples of community victories, making it easier for residents to connect with local efforts.
*NEW* We are beginning to track whether local governments and officials have signed nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) associated with data center proposals, if there is planned backup generator use, and whether the data center will be co-located with a behind-the-meter dedicated power plant.

Data centers are visualized according to size and status.

Looking at the data, we’ve started to see general trends emerge. Looking at siting patterns, we found that Alaska, Rhode Island, and Vermont are the only states in the U.S. that do not currently have data centers or data center proposals. Virginia has emerged as the dominant hub by a large margin (452), followed by Georgia (174), Texas (167), and Pennsylvania (92). Across these leading states, a substantial portion of projects remain in early stages of development. Virginia alone has 215 proposed sites, while Texas, Georgia, and Pennsylvania report 75, 69, and 41 proposed projects, respectively.

Northern Virginia has the highest density of wide-area fiber optic networking in the world, connecting it to all major U.S. markets. Loudoun County, VA (nicknamed “Data Center Alley”) is the epicenter, with more than half of global internet traffic created or passing through this area. Georgia, especially Atlanta, has become a data center hotspot in part due to generous subsidies and incentives, such as tax breaks, offered to attract developers. Texas and Pennsylvania lead the country in fracked gas production. New fracked gas infrastructure goes hand in hand with many data center proposals in these regions.

Table 1. Data Center Prevalence by State

Last updated 3/26/2026

State	Total	Proposed	Approved/Permitted/ Under construction	Expanding	Operating	Suspended	Cancelled
Virginia	452	215	11	33	181	7	5
Georgia	174	69	11	1	86	5	2
Texas	167	75	26	4	60	2
Pennsylvania	92	40		2	43	4	3
Ohio	52	28	4		16	3	1
Indiana	35	13	4		7	7	4
New York	32	12	1		16	1	2
Illinois	30	16	6		4	1	3
Arizona	28	9	8		9		2
North Carolina	25	14	1		6	1	3
California	24	11	3	1	8	1
Michigan	20	9	3	1	1	4	2
Missouri	19	12	2		4		1
Washington	18	1			17
Iowa	17	7	4	1	5
Oregon	17	4	1	2	9		1
Wisconsin	17	7	3		1	2	4
Nevada	14	7	3		4
Maryland	13	8	1		3	1
Kentucky	11	3	2	2	2		2
Oklahoma	11	3	3		5
Minnesota	10	7	1			2
New Jersey	10	4	1		3		2
Tennessee	10	4		1	5
Alabama	8	3	1		4
Nebraska	8	1	1		6
New Mexico	8	2	1		5
South Carolina	8	4	1		2		1
West Virginia	8	6	2
Colorado	7	2	1		4
Florida	7	4	2			1
Louisiana	7	4	1	1	1
Mississippi	7	4	2		1
Utah	7	5		1		1
Arkansas	6	3	1		2
North Dakota	6	1	1		4
Kansas	5	4					1
Massachusetts	5	2		1	2
Wyoming	4	2	2
Connecticut	3	3
Maine	3	2					1
Montana	3	3
South Dakota	3	2				1
Delaware	1					1
Hawaii	1			1
Idaho	1	1
New Hampshire	1				1
Alaska	0
Rhode Island	0
Vermont	0
Total	1415	636	115	52	527	45	40

Analysis of facility size reveals a clear shift toward large-scale, energy-intensive development that will have substantial implications for regional energy systems and infrastructure planning. Among sites with available MW demand data, the majority fall within the hyperscale range (100-999 MW), with a substantial number of projects exceeding 1,000 MW (1 GW) at the “mega campus” scale. Together, these larger facilities account for over 60% of sites with known energy demand in our database. However, the majority of the data centers in our full database have unknown estimated power demand (59%). Data center operators and developers are secretive about their projects, and this lack of transparency has led to many missing fields in our database. Without this basic transparency, many communities and local governments are asked to make decisions without fully understanding the effects the project might have if built.

There has been a shift towards hyperscale development, but the lack of transparency remains a serious problem in data center research.

Resistance Tab

This tab shows where communities are pushing back against data center proposals, and where we’re already seeing victories. Community organizing can directly shape infrastructure outcomes. Data center development is not inevitable, and community success stories can serve as examples of proactive intervention strategies that other advocates can learn from. Community resistance is widespread and growing, indicating a broader national pattern rather than a series of local anomalies.

The Resistance tab makes it easy to see where community pushback has led to victories.

Our dataset documents over 150 instances of resistance to data center development across the U.S., including 40 highlighted project victories. In this context, resistance is defined broadly to capture the full range of community and policy responses to proposed infrastructure. This includes grassroots efforts such as petitions, advocacy campaigns, and local organizing networks, as well as more formal interventions like temporary moratoriums, zoning changes, and new regulatory requirements. Victories encompass concrete project outcomes, including denied permits, withdrawn proposals, and fully canceled developments. Taken together, these categories show how resistance operates at multiple levels and stages of the development process.

Several recent cases illustrate the diversity and effectiveness of these efforts. The zoning process can be particularly relevant in areas that have zoning restrictions. In Goodyear, Arizona, Tract withdrew its proposed $14 billion data center project in May 2024 following sustained opposition during the rezoning process. Residents raised concerns about building height, noise, and strain on local resources, ultimately applying enough pressure to influence local decision-making and lead to the project’s abandonment. In Peculiar, Missouri, a $1.5 billion proposal by Diode Ventures was blocked after organized opposition from the group Don’t Dump Data on Peculiar. Community concerns about visual impacts, noise, and property values prompted the city to amend its zoning ordinance. By October 2024, data centers were removed as a permitted land use altogether in Peculiar, creating a lasting policy barrier beyond a single project. In Montour County, Pennsylvania, commissioners rejected a rezoning request for more than 800 acres of agricultural land tied to a Talen Energy and Amazon data center proposal in February 2026. This decision followed strong public opposition, including organizing by Concerned Citizens of Montour County, who raised concerns about environmental impacts and the industrialization of rural farmland.

In Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, a proposed data center project was halted when a landowner declined a $15 million purchase offer and instead placed the land into a conservation easement. While not driven by a formal advocacy campaign, this case reflects broader regional resistance to development pressures and a prioritization of land conservation. In Virginia, the $24.7 billion Prince William Digital Gateway project has faced significant delays due to sustained community opposition and legal challenges led by groups such as Protect Prince William County and local homeowners’ associations. Ongoing litigation has halted construction while appeals proceed, demonstrating how coordinated legal strategies can slow or reshape large-scale projects.

As data center development continues to accelerate, these patterns suggest that community engagement and local governance will play an increasingly central role in determining where and how data centers are built.

Demographics Tab

This tab allows users to explore the demographics of communities living near data center sites or proposals. It is also possible to cross reference our data center data with designated environmental justice areas and regions with high health burdens. The CDC Environmental Justice Index (EJI) data classifies census block groups according to social vulnerability, health vulnerability, and environmental burden, with darker red areas indicating higher environmental justice concerns. CDC PLACES data shows chronic disease rates, cancer rates, asthma rates, and areas with low health insurance coverage, which can be viewed at the county, census tract, or “place” level (such as cities). Census Bureau Population Characteristics shows baseline population characteristics at various geographic divisions, such as race and age. In some regions data center development is encroaching on Tribal Nations and Indigenous communities, so we’ve included the locations of Federally Recognized Tribal Lands. Our hope is that by visualizing the demographics surrounding a data center proposal, communities and decision-makers can better understand the needs and vulnerabilities of the people that will be directly affected by the facility.

Researchers are beginning to examine whether data centers are disproportionately sited in environmental justice areas. Environmental justice refers to the equitable distribution of environmental benefits and burdens. This concept emerged in response to the disproportionate environmental hazards faced by low-income communities and communities of color, which are often situated near hazardous waste sites, industrial facilities, and polluted areas.The EJI data presented here can help community members show that adding a new polluter to their neighborhoods may contribute to cumulative legacy pollution and worsen existing public health problems. One example of a data center that is located in an environmental justice community is xAI’s Colossus 2 in Memphis, which operates unpermitted gas turbines for power and releases smog, NOx, and formaldehyde into the surrounding predominantly Black community.

xAI’s Colossus 2 contributes pollution to a predominantly Black community with pre-existing environmental justice concerns in Memphis, TN.

Power Grid Tab

This tab allows users to explore the energy infrastructure near data center sites. New data center proposals are, more often than not, reported as hyperscale or near-hyperscale in their energy demands. This represents a staggering amount of additional energy that will either strain the existing power grid or be met by new power generators that are run on dirty fossil fuels like fracked gas, leaving residents at risk for increased pollution and utility bill increases. For comparison, the electricity needs of a 100 MW data center is roughly equivalent to the needs of approximately 83,429 U.S. households.

<br />

The Energy Information Administration monitors existing and proposed power generating units at electric power plants with 1 MW or greater of combined nameplate capacity. We’ve used this data to create different subsets of generators that can be used to show the power generating capacity and potential of an area. Operating Power Plants and Planned Power Generators show nearby existing capacity and energy sources that a new data center might use. Peaking Power Generators show generators that generally run only when there is a high power demand. There is a possibility that these peaking generators could be upgraded for full-time use to meet data center demand. As with the first version of the tracker, Retired Generators and Generators Retiring by 2036 shows former and soon-to-be retired power generator sites with a capacity of at least 10 MW. Because these power generator sites were grid-tied and there are financial incentives for brownfield development, they may be desirable for data center development in the future. In regions like southwestern Pennsylvania, we are seeing multiple data center proposals on brownfield sites left behind by shuttered power plants, including Homer City Energy Campus, Springdale Data Center, and Shippingport Data Center/Project Phoenix.

The Homer City Energy Campus in Southwestern PA is proposed on the site of a former coal plant. A new 4.5 GW gas power plant is proposed onsite to power the data center.

A variety of other layers are also included to help users understand how power is generated in their community and how data centers might change that power generation. U.S. Power Transmission Lines show how the power grid is interconnected. Control Areas are controlled by balancing authorities, who are responsible for monitoring and balancing the generation, load, and transmission of electric power within their region. Finally, U.S. Electric Utility Service Areas show the coverage areas for electric utility providers. Control Area and Utility Service Area control can help predict which customers a new data center might contract for power and which customers might be at risk of rate increases.

Environment Tab

This tab can be used to better understand the environmental context of data center proposals, including serious land use, air quality, and water availability concerns. In order to help users better understand potential air quality consequences, we’ve included EJScreen Toxic Releases to the Air (datasets no longer available online federally, but accessible here). This data was derived from the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), an EPA program that tracked the release of 770 different toxic chemicals at a facility level. We also included Wetlands and Water Sources from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s National Wetlands Inventory to allow users to explore an area’s water resources and sensitive ecosystems.

The environment around a data center matters. Hyperscale facilities can consume up to 5 million gallons of water per day to cool their servers, meaning a single data center can use as much water as a city of 10,000-50,000 people. Despite this need for an enormous amount of water, many data centers are proposed in arid regions such as Arizona and New Mexico. In the desert, low humidity allows maximum evaporative cooling for servers and equipment, making these regions desirable for data center development. For projects like Project Jupiter in Doña Ana County in New Mexico, the water needs of data centers may directly compete with the drinking water needs of local communities.

Despite an initial demand of 2.5 million gallons per building and ongoing water needs averaging 20,000 gallons per day, Project Jupiter in New Mexico is proposed in the desert.

Methods

FracTracker’s U.S. Data Center Tracker dataset is compiled from a variety of sources by FracTracker staff to provide facility-level insights into the expansion of data center infrastructure across the United States. Data are validated through cross-referencing multiple sources when available, maintaining source documentation for traceability, and flagging uncertain entries for follow-up. While the dataset represents one of the most comprehensive efforts to document both data center development and associated resistance, it is subject to limitations, including uneven data availability and potential underreporting. Our project is a constant work in progress and we cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness.

Sources include:

News and trade press reporting
Public records such as zoning documents, permits, planning documents, government databases and regulatory materials
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) responses
Crowdsourced submissions from advocacy organizations and community members
Collaborator datasets including Piedmont Environmental Council and Science for Georgia

Resistance data are systematically identified to capture both community- and policy-level responses to development. These include advocacy campaigns, petition platforms, local organizing efforts, and formal government actions, as documented in municipal records, meeting minutes, ordinances, and media coverage. Each instance of resistance is, where possible, linked to a specific site or jurisdiction. Victories refer to cases in which proposed developments were halted, withdrawn, or denied approval. Moratoriums are temporary policy measures that pause development to allow for further assessment or regulatory planning. Ordinances or regulatory actions represent longer-term structural changes that establish new rules governing data center siting and operation. Moratoriums and ordinances will be added to the map soon.

We will continue to update our tracker. Please reach out to us at jones@fractracker.org with comments or suggestions, or fill out our crowdsourcing form to submit information about a data center that isn’t on our map!

Conclusion

We have reframed our U.S. Data Centers Tracker as an advocacy focused dashboard. Data from numerous sources are presented on organized tabs to provide transparent, real-time visibility into projects that have major implications for energy demand, climate goals, and community health. Across the United States, residents, local organizations, and municipal governments are actively shaping development outcomes through community organizing and policy intervention. Data center development is not inevitable, and the actionable information presented in the U.S. Data Centers Tracker can give advocates the tools they need to understand and communicate the risks and harms imposed by the data center expansion boom.

Take Action

Submit information about a data center we are missing
Connect with other advocates on the Halt the Harm Network
Share the tool with community and environmental groups working on clean energy, zoning, and public health.

Where to Learn More

Topics in This Article:

Articles, Data, News, Power

Join the Conversation

0 replies

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Stay Informed

Support Our Work

FracTracker Alliance helps communicate the risks of oil and gas and petrochemical development to advance just energy alternatives that protect public health, natural resources, and the climate.

By contributing to FracTracker, you are helping to make tangible changes, such as decreasing the number of oil and gas wells in the US, protecting the public from toxic and radioactive chemicals, and stopping petrochemical expansion into vulnerable communities.

Your donations help fund the sourcing and analysis of new data so that we can keep you informed and continually update our resources.

Please donate to FracTracker today as a way to advocate for clean water, clean air, and healthy communities.

What You Should Read Next

FracTracker’s New Data Tool Visualizes Shell’s Pollution, Violations, and Malfunctions Ahead of Permit Public Hearing

March 26, 2026

0 Comments

FracTracker’s new tool reveals emissions, violations, and pollution impacts from Shell’s Monaca petrochemical facility ahead of public hearings.

Howell Township Data Center Win: $1B Project Withdrawn After Community Meeting on Energy and Infrastructure Impacts

January 14, 2026

0 Comments

Howell Township residents organized a community panel with over 200 attendees to discuss the energy and infrastructure impacts of a proposed data center. After the meeting, the proposal was withdrawn and the township enacted a six-month moratorium.

Comment Opposing the Southeast Supply Enhancement Project (SSEP) – Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit Application (SAW-2024-01961)

September 3, 2025

0 Comments

FracTracker Alliance strongly opposes the Southeast Supply Enhancement Project and its Clean Water Act permit application.

California’s New Oil Wells Average 13.5 Barrels/Day — Far Below State Projections

August 26, 2025

Analysis of CalGEM data shows California’s new oil wells average only 13.5 barrels/day, far below the 30 barrels/day projected in state legislation.

Photo by David Becker

FracTracker Launches Oil, Gas, and Petrochemical Data Portals

August 22, 2025

0 Comments

FracTracker Alliance has launched two new public data portals that make information on oil, gas, and petrochemical development free and accessible to the public.

Colorado Operators Increase Chemical Disclosures After Public Pressure, but Major Gaps Remain

July 22, 2025

2 Comments

Since the release of a May 2025 report exposing widespread noncompliance with Colorado’s 2022 oil and gas chemical disclosure law, well-by-well oil and gas chemical disclosures have significantly increased, nearly doubling the total submitted since the law took effect under the state’s landmark transparency legislation.

Evaluation of Federal Requirements for Plugging Orphaned Oil and Gas Wells: A Missouri Case Study

July 21, 2025

Missouri is home to an estimated 5,000 orphaned or abandoned oil and gas wells. The problem is even more staggering nationwide, with over one million such wells scattered across the country. In an effort to address the crisis, the federal government has committed $1.6 billion to help states plug these wells and mitigate the environmental and health risks they pose.

https://www.kvpr.org/post/dormant-risky-new-state-law-aims-prevent-problems-idle-oil-and-gas-wells

Methane Matters, but Make Polluters Pay: FracTracker’s Response to Carl Pope

July 3, 2025

0 Comments

In a recent op-ed, Carl Pope called for public subsidies to fix methane leaks in oil and gas infrastructure. While we agree on the urgency of reducing methane, FracTracker Alliance rejects the idea that taxpayers should foot the bill.

Shell Polymers Monaca: 17.9 Billion Pounds of Emissions and Repeated Violations in Pennsylvania

July 3, 2025

0 Comments

Dashboard data shows how Shell’s emissions, regulatory violations, and proximity to sensitive community sites pose serious public health concerns in Beaver County, PA.

Plum Borough Rejects Fracking Waste Injection Well After Public Pushback

June 30, 2025

0 Comments

Plum Borough’s Zoning Hearing Board unanimously rejected Penneco Environmental Solutions’ proposal for a second fracking waste injection well.

Power Plant Locations and Unemployment Rates

May 31, 2025

0 Comments

A FracTracker analysis investigates the link between energy infrastructure and economic distress, revealing that U.S. power plants are disproportionately concentrated in counties with high unemployment.

Pipeline Incidents Are a Daily Occurrence

April 7, 2025

Pipeline incidents are more common, more dangerous, and more underreported than you might realize. This articles investigates a critical infrastructure system plagued by daily disasters and raises serious questions about data integrity and public safety. Read on to discover the full extent of the problem.

Environmental Justice Analysis of Oil Extraction in Los Angeles Communities

March 27, 2025

Oil drilling in Los Angeles disproportionately burdens marginalized communities. This analysis shows elevated poverty and non-white demographics in areas with high well density, exacerbating environmental injustice.

How Increased Protective Buffer Zones Could Help Protect 3.6 million Pennsylvanians

March 26, 2025

Learn how proposed buffers around fracking sites could protect 3.6 million residents in Pennsylvania.

Regulatory Gaps and Resistance: The Battle Over Fracking in Southern Illinois

January 31, 2025

Guest authors Sam Stearns and Tabitha Tripp dive into the complex history of resource extraction in Southern Illinois. Drawing on personal experience and the work of community organizers, they reveal the threats posed by fracking, the failures of regulatory agencies, and the urgent need for environmental justice.

Can California Energy Policy Move Past its Contradictions?

January 31, 2025

California's energy policy is riddled with contradictions. Explore how the state's climate goals clash with its continued reliance on fossil fuels, carbon capture, and fragmented regulations.

FracTracker Alliance, 2024

Data Gaps: A Critical Examination of Oil and Gas Well Incidents in Ohio

January 6, 2025

0 Comments

Over the past eight years, approximately 2,000 incidents associated with oil and gas wells occurred in Ohio. Many incidents were not accurately categorized, meaning much of the data understates the severity of records.

Great Plains Action Society

Indigenous Communities’ Fight Against CO2 Pipelines in the Great Plains

October 22, 2024

0 Comments

FracTracker Alliance and Great Plains Action Society have launched an environmental justice mapping tool to support Indigenous communities in their resistance against CO2 pipelines.

Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Industry Trends: Drilled Wells, Violations, Production, and Waste

August 1, 2024

This article looks at trends in the oil and gas industry in Pennsylvania, including the number of drilled wells, violations that have been issued, oil and gas production, and waste generation. We also point out examples of how data limitations make it challenging to answer frequently asked questions.

A Closer Look at Risks of the Appalachian Hydrogen Hub

June 5, 2024

The U.S. Department of Energy's ARCH2 hydrogen hub project presents substantial risks to the environment and human health and safety.

FracTracker Alliance, 2024

Falcon Pipeline Criminal Charges Explained

June 5, 2024

1 Comment

On April 19, 2024, Pennsylvania Attorney General Michelle Henry charged Shell Pipeline Company LP with 13 misdemeanor charges for failure to report or underreporting industrial waste releases during the construction of the Falcon Pipeline in Pennsylvania.

The Importance of Surveying Rural Landowners in North Dakota on Fracking

June 4, 2024

There is a need for more research on the human impact of the oil and gas industry in North Dakota, particularly on landowners and farmers, to understand their experiences and address their concerns effectively.

Exploring the Fallout of Precision Scheduled Rail: A Rail Worker’s Perspective on Precision Scheduled Rail

June 4, 2024

Precision scheduled rail has raised concerns about safety and infrastructure degradation, with railroads focusing on cutting costs at the expense of maintaining a robust network.

Fracking drilling rig in Washington County, Pennsylvania

Not-So-Radical Transparency: An Ineffective and Unnecessary Partnership Between Pennsylvania Governor Shapiro and the Gas Company CNX

May 2, 2024

CNX’s “radical transparency” data provides incomplete information and heavily downplays the dangers of fracking.

California Must Improve Management of Idle Wells

May 2, 2024

California’s current regulations under AB 2729 have been inadequate to reduce the state’s counts of idle wells. This issue needs to be addressed immediately, before the state of California is exposed to additional economic risk.

Holes in FracFocus

April 26, 2024

An Open-FF analysis reveals how comprehensive regulatory and reporting reforms are imperative to closing holes in FracFocus data and holding the oil and gas industry accountable for its impacts.

FracTracker Alliance, 2024

Mapping PFAS Chemicals Used in Fracking Operations in West Virginia

March 29, 2024

FracTracker mapped data for a report by Physicians for Social Responsibility that sheds light on the oil and gas industry’s use of hazardous “forever chemicals” in West Virginia.

Chevron’s $2.3 Billion Asset Adjustment Raises Questions Amidst Regulatory Changes in California

March 7, 2024

1 Comment

Information disclosed in Chevron’s 2023 Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) Form 10-K filed on February 26, 2024, suggests Chevron was hoping to eventually offload its idle wells to a limited liability company to avoid the cost of properly decommissioning its wells in California.

Ross incinerator in Eaton Township. Photo by Ted Auch, FracTracker Alliance, 2023

Stop Toxic Threat: A Heavy Industrial Zoning Battle

February 7, 2024

The Norfolk Southern train derailment in February 2023 ignited a battle for public health, safety, and welfare over 100 miles away in Eaton Township, Ohio.

Ross Environmental Hazardous Waste Incinerator in Eaton Township, Ohio. Ted Auch, FracTracker Alliance, 2023

East Palestine Warning: The Growing Threat From Hazardous Waste Storage

February 1, 2024

Is the gradual increase in hazardous waste storage and incineration expansion in Eaton Township, Ohio, fueling a preventable future disaster?

FracTracker Alliance, 2024

Index of Oil and Gas Operator Health in California Shows Risks to State Economy and Taxpayers

January 30, 2024

Though a handful of California of oil and gas operators continue to produce profitable volumes of oil, the majority of California operators, including the state’s oil and gas major corporations, Chevron, Aera Energy, and California Resources Corporation, are producing very low average volumes of oil per well.

Property in Belmont County, Ohio, vacated due to nearby drilling activity.

The cottage along Slope Creek, months after being vacated due to health concerns caused by nearby oil and gas operations. Photo courtesy of Chloe Mankin

Calling for Change: Life on the Fracking Frontlines

January 12, 2024

Frontline residents of the Ohio River Valley have first-hand experience of the impacts of fracking.

On the Wrong Track: Risks to Residents of the Upper Ohio River Valley From Railroad Incidents

December 14, 2023

1 Comment

Report finds risks to residents of the Upper Ohio River Valley as a result of an average of over four rail incidents per week in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia.

Matt Kelso, FracTracker Alliance, 2023

Digital Atlas: Exploring Nature and Industry in the Raccoon Creek Watershed

November 16, 2023

Digital atlas of Pennsylvania's Raccoon Creek unveils a comprehensive exploration of the watershed, emphasizing its ecological richness, recreational offerings, and the multifaceted impacts of industrial activities.

Why Do Houses Keep Exploding in One Pennsylvania Suburb?

November 9, 2023

An exploration of factors related to oil and gas activity that could contribute to the history of house explosions in Plum Borough, Pennsylvania.

FracTracker Alliance Releases Statement Opposing Governor Shapiro’s Agreement With CNX

November 7, 2023

FracTracker Alliance Executive Director Shannon Smith releases statement in opposition to Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro's agreement with natural gas company CNX.

Oil and Gas Activity Within California Public Health Protection Zones

October 4, 2023

Assessment shows hundreds of sensitive receptor sites located within 3,200 feet of operational oil and gas wells in California would have been protected if California Senate Bill 1137 had not been challenged by referendum.

Assessment of Oil and Gas Well Ownership Transfers in California

May 18, 2023

A report by FracTracker Alliance finds that more comprehensive bonding requirements are necessary to protect the state of California from being left financially accountable for the plugging and abandonment of tens of thousands of orphaned oil and gas wells.

Evaluation of the Capacity for Water Recycling for Colorado Oil and Gas Extraction Operations

May 2, 2023

A report by FracTracker Alliance finds Colorado’s oil and gas industry has produced enough wastewater statewide to completely satisfy the current and past needs of source water for hydraulic fracturing completions.

Sarah Carballo, FracTracker Alliance, 2022

Evidence Shows Oil and Gas Companies Use PFAS in New Mexico Wells

April 27, 2023

A new report released by Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR) in April 2023 reveals that oil and gas companies have been using PFAS, a class of extremely toxic and persistent chemicals, in New Mexico since at least 2013.

CalGEM Permit Review Q1 2023: Well Rework Permits Increase by 76% in California

April 14, 2023

In Q1 2023, the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) gave out 896 rework permits to oil companies. More than half of these permits were for wells located within 3,200 feet of homes, schools, or healthcare facilities.

Tennessee Pipeline Incident by Ted Auch, 2022, with support from LightHawk.

Ted Auch, FracTracker Alliance, 2022

2022 Pipeline Incidents Update: Is Pipeline Safety Achievable?

February 1, 2023

1 Comment

This analysis provides a top-level summary of pipeline incidents reported to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) and examines whether or not safe oversight of the industry is possible.

Oil refinery in Toledo, OH. Photo by Ted Auch.

Testimony On EPA’s Proposed Methane Pollution Standards for the Oil and Gas Industry

January 31, 2023

FracTracker Alliance supports strong federal methane rules and urges further improvements that are needed to curb dangerous methane emissions.

Assessment of Rework Permits on Oil Production from Operational Wells Within the 3,200-Foot Public Health Protection Zone

January 24, 2023

This analysis shows that the policy proposed in SB 1137 of denying rework permits within the health protection zones is a commonsense public health intervention that would have minimal effects on production within the protection zone.

CalGEM Permit Review Q4 2022: Oil Permit Approvals Show Steep Rise Within Protective Buffer Zones

January 18, 2023

During the fourth quarter of 2022, California regulator CalGEM issued oil and gas operators 222 new drilling permits, an increase of over 750% compared to the fourth quarter of 2021. Of those, nearly half (100; 47%) were for wells located within the 3,200’ public health setback zone.

Stacked pipes used in constructing oil and gas pipelines

A Contentious Landscape of Pipeline Build-outs in the Eastern US

November 30, 2022

1 Comment

In this article, we’ll feature four contentious pipeline build-outs in the Eastern United States, show ways in which those pipelines impact natural and human communities, and provide examples of how environmental advocates have challenged these projects, with varying degrees of success.

Major Gas Leak Reveals Risks of Aging Gas Storage Wells in Pennsylvania

November 30, 2022

Following an enormous gas leak in Jackson Township, Cambria County Pennsylvania, we mapped oil and gas storage wells and fields throughout the state and found that the majority of Pennsylvania’s storage wells were drilled prior to 1979, making them most vulnerable to well failures.

Coursing Through Gasland: A Digital Atlas Exploring Natural Gas Development in the Towanda Creek Watershed

November 23, 2022

This digital atlas exploring natural gas development in the Towanda Creek watershed is the fourth in a series of FracTracker Alliance watershed impact analyses in the Susquehanna River Basin.

Falcon Pipeline Online, Begins Operations Following Violations of Clean Streams Law

November 17, 2022

The Shell ethane cracker in Beaver County, Pennsylvania, and Falcon Pipeline begin operations following civil penalties from Pennsylvania regulators for violations of the Clean Streams Law.

Synopsis: Risks to the Greater Columbus Water Supply from Oil and Gas Production

October 31, 2022

1 Comment

A white paper by Columbus Community Rights Coalition (CCRC) will inform resident stakeholders of risks to the water associated with oil & gas production activities occurring within their watershed region of Columbus, Ohio.

Desalination: The Chemical Industry’s Demand for Water in Texas

September 19, 2022

Desalination facilities proposed by the petrochemical industry in Texas could significantly impact fragile Gulf Coast ecosystems.

Take Action in Support of No New Leases

September 6, 2022

The federal government is accepting comments on a 5-Year Offshore Oil and Gas Lease Program. We need your voice to join in solidarity with communities in the Gulf and the Arctic and call for no new leases.

Abandoned Infrastructure in Keene, North Dakota. Photo by David Nix.

Carbon Capture and Storage: Developments in the Law of Pore Space in North Dakota

August 31, 2022

The interplay between the rights of the owner of the surface estate and the rights of the mineral estate have recently become the subject of both legislation and litigation as the use of subsurface pore space by various energy industries has developed at an increasingly rapid pace in North Dakota.

Carbon Capture and Storage: Industry Connections and Community Impacts

August 31, 2022

Industries that stand to capitalize on the proliferation of carbon capture and storage are aggressively pursuing its development despite its wide-ranging risks and diminishing returns for communities across the U.S.

Carbon Capture and Storage: Fact or Fiction?

August 31, 2022

Extractive industry uses propaganda to protect private profits at the expense of the public interest. According to the evidence, there is reason to believe that carbon capture and storage (CCS) is one such scheme.

Pipeline Right-of-Ways: Making the Connection between Forest Fragmentation and the Spread of Lyme Disease in Southwestern Pennsylvania

August 22, 2022

1 Comment

While many ecological factors may contribute to the spread of Lyme disease, two of the most significant factors are believed to be climate change and forest fragmentation. This study assesses the role that different pipeline construction proxies play in the change in average annual Lyme disease rate in Pennsylvania counties from 2001 to 2019.

FracTracker Finds Widespread Hydrocarbon Emissions from Active & Idle Oil and Gas Wells and Infrastructure in California

August 22, 2022

1 Comment

FracTracker inspections of oil and gas infrastructure using an optical gas imaging camera found numerous sources of uncontrolled emissions in three California counties.

California Regulators Approve More Oil Well Permits Amid a Crisis of Leaking Oil Wells that Should be Plugged

July 29, 2022

FracTracker’s in-the-field inspections and updated analysis of CalGEM permit data shows that California’s regulatory practices and permitting policies risk exposing frontline communities to VOCs from oil and gas well sites.

Map of potential carbon capture technology

An Insider Take on the Appalachian Hydrogen & CCUS Conference

June 23, 2022

Reflections on the Appalachian Hydrogen and Carbon Capture conference, and how companies hope to use new tech to prolong fossil fuel dependence

Does Hydrogen Have a Role in our Energy Future?

June 21, 2022

There has been increasing focus on using hydrogen gas as a fuel, but most hydrogen is currently formed from methane, which could lead to more fracking.

Oil and Gas Brine in Ohio

May 13, 2022

2 Comments

A hazardous byproduct of oil & gas operations, called “brine," poses a problem because of its radioactivity and the volumes produced.

PA Environment Digest Blog: Conventional Oil & Gas Drillers Dispose Of Drill Cuttings By ‘Dusting’

May 3, 2022

2 Comments

David Hess reports on the pervasive & dangerous practice of waste disposal at oil and gas well drilling sites via “dusting.”

Real Talk on Pipelines

April 28, 2022

This story map contains audio clips and quotes from local officials and residents on the impacts of oil & gas pipelines in their communities.

TedAuch_Infrastructure-Compressor_Cryogenic_Complex-MarkWest_EnergyTransfer-WashingtonCounty-PA_Sept2021 feature

2021 Production from Pennsylvania’s Oil and Gas Wells

April 28, 2022

1 Comment

FracTracker has released an analysis of Pennsylvania's 2021 oil and gas production totals and the impacts of orphaned and abandoned wells.

Mapping Energy Systems Impacted by the Russia-Ukraine War

April 20, 2022

1 Comment

This story map explores how the West's failure to transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy is funding Russia's invasion of Ukraine

Dimock residents working to protect water from a new threat: fracking waste

April 11, 2022

2 Comments

Sen. Muth and Dimock, PA residents are fighting a permitted Eureka Resource Susquehanna facility that puts their water at risk.

This photo is of oil drilling in the Inglewood Oilfields of Baldwin Hills, Los Angeles. Photo by Brook Lenker, 2017.

Implications of a 3,200-foot Setback in California

April 6, 2022

California is the only major oil state without a health and safety setback from fossil fuel activity. This article explores what a setback in California means for its people and environment.

New Trends in Drilling Permit Approvals Take Shape in CA

March 15, 2022

2 Comments

FracTracker's recent analysis finds that California's drilling permit approvals have slowed since last October, but not across the board. This trend only applies to permits for new drilling and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) wells.

Oil and Gas Drilling in California Legislative Districts

March 14, 2022

FracTracker has been working with grassroots organizations to inform legislators and locals about oil and gas extraction in their districts, including maps and tables of the infrastructure in their areas.

New Report: Fracking with “Forever Chemicals” in Colorado

January 31, 2022

1 Comment

A report by PSR provides evidence that oil and gas companies have been using dangerous PFAS "forever chemicals" in CO wells.

Oil and gas wells and violations in Pennsylvania through 1/12/2022.

Introducing: FracTracker’s comprehensive new Pennsylvania map!

January 20, 2022

4 Comments

FracTracker's new Pennsylvania oil and gas well map displays conventional and unconventional wells and violations as of January 12, 2022.

New Letter from Federal Regulators Regarding how the Falcon has Been Investigated

December 1, 2021

FracTracker received a letter from federal regulators with news on Shell's Falcon Pipeline investigation, but many concerns still remain.

US Army Corps Muskingum Watershed Plan ignores local concerns of oil and gas effects

December 1, 2021

2 Comments

Local stakeholders' concerns about the environmental and health impacts of oil and gas in the Muskingum Watershed of Ohio have been minimized or excluded by the US Army Corps' environmental assessment.

Oil and gas companies use a lot of water to extract oil in drought-stricken California

November 9, 2021

2 Comments

FracTracker details the disproportionate amounts of water used by the oil and gas industry in CA and recommends that Gov. Newsom take action.

Southeastern Texas Petrochemical Industry Needs 318 Billion Gallons of Water, but the US EPA Says Not So Fast

November 5, 2021

The US EPA is moving to turn off the tap to Texas’ petrochemical operators that are demanding exorbitant water quantities where there are none.

Chickahominy Pipeline project tries to exploit an apparent regulatory loophole

November 1, 2021

Local communities are skeptical of the Chickahominy Pipeline company, which plans to build a supply line through five Virginia counties. With no track record and very little experience in pipeline construction, the company's capacity to take on this project is questionable.

Map Update on Criminal Charges Facing Mariner East 2 Pipeline

October 29, 2021

2 Comments

FracTracker mapped the 21 locations and over 120 violations by Energy Transfer Partner since Mariner East 2 Pipeline construction began.

It’s Time to Stop Urban Oil Drilling in Los Angeles

September 14, 2021

Oil & gas wells in Los Angeles disproportionately impact marginalized communities, producing dangerous levels of invisible, toxic emissions.

Infrastructure Networks in Texas

September 14, 2021

This map illustrates infrastructure networks in Texas and explores how these unseen webs connect us and improve lives, but also carry risks and burdens.

Prison Strike Poster by Melanie Cervantes

California Prisons are Within 2,500’ of Oil and Gas Extraction

September 9, 2021

California prisoners are on the frontlines of the environmental justice movement, thousands living within 2,500’ of operational O&G wells.

FracTracker map of proposed Renovo, PA power plant

New power plant proposal called senseless and wasteful by climate groups

August 26, 2021

Residents and local advocacy groups are fighting a new power plant in Renovo, PA, planned to be constructed on an abandoned rail yard.

Ongoing Safety Concerns over Shell’s Falcon Pipeline

August 24, 2021

Ohio River Valley Groups react to a new safety warning issued by federal regulators to Shell regarding the troubled Falcon Pipeline

BLenker_infrastructure-oilrig-southLA-CA_Oct2017 feature

New Neighborhood Drilling Permits Issued While California Fails to Act on Public Health Rules

August 5, 2021

California drilling permits continue while Frontline communities and grassroots groups call for an immediate moratorium and 2,500' setback.

The world is watching as bitcoin battle brews in the US

August 2, 2021

15 Comments

If Gov. Cuomo wants to lead the nation on climate, he has to address the impacts of proof of work cryptocurrency mining industry in New York.

Lycoming Watershed Digital Atlas

California Oil & Gas Drilling Permits Drop in Response to Decreased Permit Applications to CalGEM

July 26, 2021

As California permit approvals for new oil & gas well drills decrease, Consumer Watchdog urges the Governor to move from fossil fuels.

California Denies Well Stimulation Permits

July 20, 2021

California regulators recently denied 21 well stimulation permit applications—a welcomed move in the right direction—but not enough.

Mapping PFAS “Forever Chemicals” in Oil & Gas Operations

July 15, 2021

2 Comments

FracTracker Alliance released a new map identifying the locations of over 1,200 oil and gas wells using toxic “forever chemicals” in Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas, and Wyoming.

Updated National Energy and Petrochemical Map

June 30, 2021

1 Comment

We first released this map in February of 2020. In the year since, the world’s energy systems have experienced record changes. Explore the interactive map, updated by FracTracker Alliance in April, 2021.

Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania Fracking Story Map

June 11, 2021

FracTracker’s aerial survey of unconventional oil & gas infrastructure and activities in northeast PA to southern OH and central WV

Ohio & Fracking Waste: The Case for Better Waste Management

June 3, 2021

Insights on Ohio’s massive fracking waste gap, Class II injection well activity, and fracking waste related legislation

Pennsylvania Conventional Well Map Update

May 27, 2021

There are over 100,000 active conventional wells in PA, with more permitted each year. Most are unplugged, posing serious threats to the climate.

EPA

Impacts of 2020 Colonial Pipeline Rupture Continue to Grow

May 26, 2021

In August 2020, the Colonial Pipeline ruptured, spilling an estimated 1.2 million gallons of gasoline—18 times more than originally reported.

Jared Durelle

Gas Storage Plan vs. Indigenous Rights in Nova Scotia

May 20, 2021

6 Comments

The Mi’kmaq First Nations people are facing threats to their lands and water due to plans in Nova Scotia proposed by AltaGas.

Mapping Gathering Lines in Bradford County, Pennsylvania

May 19, 2021

2 Comments

FracTracker mapped gathering lines in Bradford County, PA. Public data on gathering lines are incomplete, leaving us to fill in the gaps.

Trends in fracking waste coming to New York State from Pennsylvania

April 20, 2021

2 Comments

Over the past decade, New York State has seen a steep decline in the quantity of waste products from the fracking industry sent to its landfills for disposal. Explore FracTracker's 2020 updated data.

2021 Pipeline Incidents Update: Safety Record Not Improving

April 14, 2021

The map below shows 6,950 total incidents since 2010, translating to 1.7 incidents per day. Pipelines are dangerous, in part because regulation around them is ineffective.

New York State Oil & Gas Well Drilling: Patterns Over Time

April 1, 2021

5 Comments

In this article, we look specifically at spatial and temporal patterns in oil and gas drilling across New York State.

Risky Byhalia Connection Pipeline Threatens Tennessee & Mississippi Health, Water Supply

March 17, 2021

2 Comments

The proposed Byhalia Connection pipeline project is situated in a particularly problematic intersection where environmental justice, hydrology, geology, and risks to human and environmental health intersect.

Shell’s Falcon Pipeline Under Investigation for Serious Public Safety Threats

March 17, 2021

Shell’s Falcon Pipeline, which is designed to carry ethane to the Shell ethane cracker in Beaver County, PA for plastic production, has been under investigation by federal and state agencies, since 2019.

Kern County’s Drafted EIR Will Increase the Burden for Frontline Communities

March 4, 2021

Built on sound data and ample research, FracTracker recommends several measures be taken to protect the health of California's overburdened Frontline Communities.

FracTracker Alliance, 2021

Pennsylvania’s Waste Disposal Wells – A Tale of Two Datasets

February 26, 2021

VIEW MAP & DATA Overview Access to reliable data…

California Oil & Gas Setbacks Recommendations Memo

February 23, 2021

The purpose of this memo is to recommend guidelines to CalGEM for evaluating the economic value of the social benefits and costs to people and the environment in requiring a 2,500 foot setback for oil and gas drilling (OGD) activities.

Oil and Gas Wells on California State Lands

February 12, 2021

The fossil fuel industry has historically taken advantage of…

Industrial Impacts in Michigan: A Photo Essay & Story Map

January 29, 2021

Southwest Detroit and neighboring South Rockwood in Monroe County…

People and Production: Reducing Risk in California Extraction

December 17, 2020

2 Comments

Executive Summary New research shows that low-income communities…

Documenting emissions from new oil and gas wells in California

November 18, 2020

Working with the environmental nonprofit Earthworks,…

Energy Security, International Investment, and Democracy in the US Shale Oil & Gas Industry

October 15, 2020

FracTracker in the Field: Building a Live Virtual Map

August 14, 2020

August 19, 2020 Update: The virtual story map is live! In…

The Loyalsock Watershed Project

…

Mapping gathering lines in OH and WV feature

Mapping Gathering Lines in Ohio and West Virginia

July 2, 2020

As a spring 2020 intern with FracTracker, my work mostly involved…

Oil & Gas waste tank operated by SWEPI and Enervest at the Hayes pad, Otsego County, Michigan May 21st, 2016

The North Dakota Shale Viewer Reimagined: Mapping the Water and Waste Impact

June 18, 2020

2 Comments

We updated the FracTracker North Dakota Shale Viewer with current…

Falcon Pipeline Construction Releases over 250,000 Gallons of Drilling Fluid in Pennsylvania and Ohio

June 16, 2020

Part of the Falcon Public Environmental Impact Assessment - a…

Systematic Racism in Kern County Oil and Gas Permitting Ordinance

June 8, 2020

Kern County, California has approved at least 18,356 illegal…

Fracking Water Use in Pennsylvania Increases Dramatically

May 29, 2020

1 Comment

Unconventional wells in Pennsylvania were always resource-intensive,…

North Brooklyn Pipeline demographics map

New Yorkers mount resistance against North Brooklyn Pipeline

May 18, 2020

3 Comments

By Kim Fraczek (Sane Energy Project), with input and mapping…

Map of New 2020 Fracking Permits in California

California, Back in Frack

May 7, 2020

California is once again a fracked state. The moratorium on well…

California Setback Analyses Summary

April 2, 2020

2 Comments

FracTracker Alliance has conducted numerous spatial analyses…

Compressor station within Loyalsock State Forest, PA.

Air Pollution from Pennsylvania Shale Gas Compressor Stations – REPORT

March 19, 2020

Air pollution from Pennsylvania shale gas compressor stations…

New York State Oil & Gas Wells – 2020 Update

March 11, 2020

4 Comments

We’ve recently updated the New York State Oil and Gas Well…

National Energy and Petrochemical Map

February 28, 2020

1 Comment

This map from FracTracker Alliance is filled with energy and petrochemical data. Explore the map, continue reading to learn more, and see how your state measures up!

California Governor Gavin Newsom looks at surface expression oil spills

Governor Newsom Must Do More to Address the Cause of Oil Spill Surface Expressions

February 24, 2020

1 Comment

Chevron and other oil and gas companies in western Kern County…

Governor Newsom Well Watch website for California drilling

Oil & Gas Well Permits Issued By Newsom Administration Rival Those Issued Under Gov. Jerry Brown

February 22, 2020

FracTracker Alliance and Consumer Watchdog worked together to…

destroyed home following pipeline explosion in San Bruno, CA

Pipelines Continue to Catch Fire and Explode

February 21, 2020

2 Comments

For the past decade, petroleum operators in the United States…

The Hidden Inefficiencies and Environmental Costs of Fracking in Ohio

January 13, 2020

3 Comments

Ohio continues to increase fracked gas production, facilitated…

Fracking in Pennsylvania: Not Worth It

January 7, 2020

4 Comments

Despite the ever-increasing heaps of violations and drilling…

Photo by Ted Auch, FracTracker Alliance

Fracking Threatens Ohio’s Captina Creek Watershed

December 20, 2019

FracTracker's Great Lakes Program Coordinator Ted Auch explores…

California is Frack Free, for the Moment

November 19, 2019

…

How State Regulations Hold Us back and What Other Countries are doing about Fracking

October 10, 2019

3 Comments

While it might be tempting to welcome an industry that often creates a temporary economic spike, the costs of mitigating the environmental damage from fracking far out-weighs the profit gained.