Water use for fracking in Pennsylvania increased from 2-7 million gallons of water per well in 2008 to 14-39 million gallons of water per well in 2019.
Key Findings
Fracking permanently removes the water from the water cycle by locking it deep underground or contaminating the water with hydrocarbons, radionuclides, and high salt content.
In times of more frequent and long-lasting droughts, stringent regulations around the water used by oil and gas operations are necessary to conserve water resources locally, regionally, and potentially globally.
Water Availability in the United States
As climate change affects the United States, the Northeastern region has been receiving more annual precipitation on average than it did during the twentieth century, resulting in flash flood events. Meanwhile the Western US is receiving less precipitation amid severe drought conditions, resulting in groundwater and surface water depletion. The water shortages in the Western states are partially due to the prior appropriation water law in the West. This dates back to the early 1900s when the prior appropriation doctrine delegated a “first come, first serve” principle around water rights. This principle remains intact legally, and has contributed to the federally mandated water shortage in the Colorado River, threatening the 40 million people that rely on this water.
For reasons like these, discussions around drought and water management in the United States have naturally focused on Western regions where water management efforts have become necessary. Climate change can lead to increased variability in precipitation, meaning there will be more periods of both extreme precipitation and drought. This variability can disrupt the regular weather patterns and water cycle anywhere, impacting the amount of precipitation a region normally receives and its availability.
Ability to Produce Clean Water
Water is a fragile resource challenged by climate change, population growth, changes in land use, and increased water demand. Approximately 74% of total drinking water withdrawals in the US are from surface water sources, such as streams or reservoirs. Clean surface water is valuable for ecological and societal uses, and it is produced when precipitation occurs over natural land cover like forests, grasslands, and wetlands before entering waterways with adequate riparian cover. These catchment areas are called watersheds and they are organized into size classifications labeled with a Hydrologic Unit Code for management purposes.
The US Forest Service and Department of Agriculture created the Forest to Faucet 2.0 (F2F2) tool to assess which watersheds across the US have the most relative importance to the national drinking water supply. This tool assesses public water demand, ability to produce clean water, and projected impacts of watershed threats like climate change, diseases, and wildfires. According to F2F2, watersheds in the Eastern US have the highest importance to surface drinking water and are under the threat of climate change impacts such as drought. This will result in less water for the people and ecosystems downstream, and will further stress water treatment infrastructure.
Droughts in the Northeast
The Northeastern US has a temperate, moist climate with moderate precipitation and historically few annual short-term droughts. However, since the 1980s, drier-than-normal conditions have become more frequent and long-lasting, resulting in economically impactful droughts. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) reports that drought is the leading cause of weather-related crop loss in the Northeast. The long-term drought has become so severe that major rivers in the region have dropped to their lowest levels in local memory, with certain tributaries of the Boston area’s Charles River drying up entirely. Not a single part of Massachusetts or Rhode Island was free of drought in 2022, and extreme drought had overtaken 24.5 percent of Massachusetts and 33.63 percent of Rhode Island.
Water management approaches in upcoming years may be crucial to water security and ecological resilience across the United States. Prolonged drought can deplete groundwater aquifers that many communities rely on for drinking water and irrigation. The frequency, intensity, and duration of drought events are increasing in many areas of the United States, and this pattern is expected to continue and shift outside of historical trends.
Water Resources in Pennsylvania
Of the Northeastern states, Pennsylvania stands out as the most freshwater-rich state. It contains 86,000 miles of streams and rivers, 4,000 lakes, a border to Lake Erie, and six major watersheds. The Allegheny National Forest, along with the two million acres of state forests and the one and a half million acres of state game lands, contribute significantly to the abundance of clean water available to residents and water suppliers in the state.
Despite the rich water resources, Pennsylvania has been facing drought conditions. The PA Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP) has requested that residents voluntarily reduce their water use. As of June, at least 18 public water suppliers in the state have experienced water shortage. The variability of precipitation events brought on by climate change have resulted in a persistent lack of precipitation. The scarce precipitation has reduced stream flows and led to lowered water levels in reservoirs, lakes, and rivers. This will result in reduced water availability, decreased agricultural productivity, increased costs for water treatment and distribution, and reduced revenue from tourism and recreational activities.
The first Pennsylvania State Water Plan was released in 2002, following a six-month consecutive drought in PA, and it aimed to strategize water planning across the state. The most recent State Water Plan, released in January 2023 emphasizes the importance of water planning on a holistic watershed basis, considering both droughts and floods, and placing responsibility on the River Basin Commissions and local governments to manage water ordinances.
One specific goal that is mentioned in the state plan is “Improving the collection, assessment and sharing of reported water use data including consumptive use in projecting future demand trends and managing and accessing water supply and water availability on a watershed scale.”
As explained further in the text, this goal fails to discuss fracking activities as consumptive water use, which we will discuss below.
Fracking Threatens Pennsylvania Water
The Marcellus shale play is a type of shale that spreads across parts of Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia, Ohio, Maryland, and Virginia. Natural gas extraction and processing from Marcellus shale accelerated in 2008 after advancements in high-volume slick-water hydraulic fracturing technology, commonly known as fracking. The Marcellus shale play was the third-largest unconventional gas producer in the world in 2021. The number of permitted unconventional gas wells in the region as of 2023:
- Pennsylvania: 22,723 wells permitted.
- Ohio: 3,988 wells permitted.
- West Virginia: around 5,386 wells permitted.
In Pennsylvania, freshwater used in the fracking process is typically drawn from surface water sources such as streams and rivers. The Oil & Gas Act of 2012 in Pennsylvania requires operators of hydraulically fractured wells to disclose some chemicals used in the process to a database called FracFocus. It’s important to note that many chemicals, including hazardous ones, are usually left out of the disclosure under protections of trade secrets.
Efforts are being made to make FracFocus less challenging to use, like Open-FF. This is an open-source, public service project that transforms the fracking industry’s FracFocus disclosure data into a usable resource. It uses python code stored at CodeOcean to convert FracFocus data into CSVs, making it easier to decipher and track chemicals used during operations.
FracFocus also includes information on water usage by fracking operators. Between 2008 and 2022, FracFocus received 8,653 well disclosures across the state of Pennsylvania. However, there is a discrepancy between the number of wells that exist (PA DEP claims over 23,000) and the number of wells reported to FracFocus (8,653), suggesting that conclusions drawn from FracFocus data severely underestimate the true impact of fracking.
The withdrawal of surface water for fracking purposes can have a significant impact on the hydrologic regime of nearby streams and rivers. This water is removed permanently from the water cycle, which in turn affects the surrounding ecosystem. This highlights the potential environmental consequences of consuming large amounts of water for fracking operations. These withdrawals undergo permitting processes prior to well development, and one of those is to produce a Water Management Plan.
A Water Management Plan (WMP) is a plan associated with drilling or completing a well in an unconventional formation, as required by the PA DEP. It demonstrates that the withdrawal and use of water sources within Pennsylvania waters protect those sources as required by law and it takes into account contamination, water quantities, and safety practices. In PA, WMP’s are reviewed by their respective River Basin Commission and the PA DEP before fracking operations begin.
Fracking Activity Over Annual Drought Conditions in Pennsylvania
This interactive map looks at annual non-consecutive weeks of drought as well as fracking operations in Pennsylvania.
View the map “Details” tab below in the top right corner to learn more and access the data, or click on the map to explore the dynamic version of this data. Data sources are also listed at the end of this article. In order to turn layers on and off in the map, use the Layers dropdown menu. This tool is only available in Full Screen view. Items will activate in this map dependent on the level of zoom in or out.
View Full Size Map | Updated 7/1/2023 | Map Tutorial
Freshwater Consumption
The US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) noted the danger of freshwater consumption for fracking in 2021. Their review of the effects of fracking on the water cycle revealed that less than 10-30% of injected fluid was recovered as flowback across the Marcellus shale play and of that, less than 1% of flowback is treated and returned to surface water.
Millions of gallons of lost water remain stuck underground, essentially removed from the hydrologic cycle and unable to be processed and recycled. Many studies, including the US EPA study, note that there is scientific evidence that activities in the hydraulic fracturing water cycle can impact the quantity and quality of drinking water resources.
Hydraulic fracturing uses extremely high volumes of water. FracTracker Alliance’s previous review of freshwater use found the range of 2-7 million gallons of water per well in 2008 had increased over the years, to 14-39 million gallons of water per well in 2019. An updated review of FracFocus water use found the annual average volume of freshwater consumed in well development has increased at a rate of 1 million additional gallons of water per well each year.
The following interactive map is intended to view the total amount of water used by fracking operations within each watershed (HUC12) boundary during a chosen year. It’s common practice to use county boundaries to visualize fracking related activities. However, we chose to use natural watershed boundaries, as these reflect the affected ecosystems and better aid management strategy. These fracking operations may have transported water to the site, so it’s important to note that this map does not show how much water was removed from the watersheds. The transparency around water use and trade across all sectors, despite being a shared resource, is an issue that limits the tracking of their use and origin.
Annual Water Volume Used for Fracking in Pennsylvania
This interactive map shows the total volume of water used by fracking operations within watershed (HUC12) boundaries each year in Pennsylvania.
View the map “Details” tab below in the top right corner to learn more and access the data, or click on the map to explore the dynamic version of this data. Data sources are also listed at the end of this article. In order to turn layers on and off in the map, use the Layers dropdown menu. This tool is only available in Full Screen view. Items will activate in this map dependent on the level of zoom in or out.
View Full Size Map | Updated 7/1/2023 | Map Tutorial
The Takeaway
Regionally, fracking water withdrawals from small streams has resulted in 10-20% flow reductions in about half of HUC12 watersheds in the Ohio River Basin. On a global scale, scientists are concerned about freshwater appropriation and overuse. “Conceptually we know that there must be a limit for how much we can disturb the [hydrological] system before we start feeling serious impacts on the Earth system and then, by extension, to humanity,” Miina Porkka, a postdoctoral researcher at the Water and Development Group at Aalto University in Finland, told Mongabay in the article “Beyond boundaries: Earth’s water cycle is being bent to breaking point.”
Water management plans guide water withdrawals during drought or dry conditions and although a basic framework exists, a statewide standard must be developed to further protect small stream flows. In times of more frequent and long-lasting droughts, stringent regulations around the water used by oil and gas operations are necessary to conserve water resources locally, regionally, and potentially globally.
References & Where to Learn More
- Read the next articles in this series:
- Watch the research presentation featuring Kat Wilson, FracTracker Environmental Health Fellow, on the impacts of fracking on surface water in Pennsylvania
Topics in This Article:
Join the Conversation
Stay Informed
Support Our Work
FracTracker Alliance helps communicate the risks of oil and gas and petrochemical development to advance just energy alternatives that protect public health, natural resources, and the climate.
By contributing to FracTracker, you are helping to make tangible changes, such as decreasing the number of oil and gas wells in the US, protecting the public from toxic and radioactive chemicals, and stopping petrochemical expansion into vulnerable communities.
Your donations help fund the sourcing and analysis of new data so that we can keep you informed and continually update our resources.
Please donate to FracTracker today as a way to advocate for clean water, clean air, and healthy communities.
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!